Skip to main content
Log in

Growth inhibition by exogenous proline and its metabolism in saltgrass (Distichlis spicata) suspension cultures

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth of Distichlis spicata suspension cultures in LS medium without NaCl was inhibited 54% by 2 mM proline. In medium containing 260 mM NaCl, 10 mM proline inhibited growth by only 22%. The uptake and metabolism of 10 mM L-[1-13C] proline was followed by 13C NMR and ninhydrin analyses of suspensions cultured in the presence of 0 or 260 mM NaCl. Uptake of 85 to 92% of the exogenous proline occurred within 72 h in all media. In 10 mM proline and no NaCl, cellular proline reached a maximm of 51.5 μmoles/g FW compared to 1.9 μmoles/g FW in suspensions not grown on proline. In medium containing 260 mM NaCl and proline, cellular proline reached 59–65 μmoles/g FW compared to 30–40 μmoles/g FW in controls grown without proline. The 13C-label in the proline-C1 was either retained in proline or disappeared, presumably released as carbon dioxide, by catabolism through the TCA cycle. Since no metabolite of 13C-proline was detected by NMR, proline was considered to be the molecule which inhibited the suspension culture growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LS:

Linsmaier and Skoog medium

FW:

fresh weight

DW:

dry weight

P5C:

Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate

TCA:

tricarboxylic acid cycle

FID:

free-induction-decay

NMR:

nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

T1 :

spin-lattice relaxation time

NOE:

Nuclear Overhauser Effect.

References

  • Bernt E, Bergmeyer, HU (1965) In: Bergmeyer, HU (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis, (1st ed.) Academic, NY pp 384–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchett R, Everett GW (1987) Plant Physiol 84:944–949

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinard FP (1952) J Biol Chem 199:91–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Daines RJ, Gould AR (1985) J Plant Physiol 119:269–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan DR, Widholm JM (1987) Plant Physiol 83:703–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Elthon TE, Stewart CR, (1982) Plant Physiol 70:567–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers TJ, Troke PF, Yeo AR (1977) Annu Rev Plant Physiol 28:89–121 enzymatic analysis, vol 3 (2nd English ed.) Verlag Chemie Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann I, Wahlefeld, WA (1974) In: Bergmeyer, HU (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis, vol 3 (2nd English ed.) Verlag Chemie Weinheim Academic, San Francisco, pp 1585–1589

    Google Scholar 

  • Handa S, Handa AK, Hasegawa, PM, Bressan RA (1986) Plant Physiol 80:938–945

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson AD, Hitz WD (1982) Annu Rev Plant Physiol 33:163–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker M, Nabors MW (1977) Z Pflanzenphysiol 84:237–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson PJ, Unkefer CJ, Doolen JA, Watt K, Robinson NJ (1987) Proc Natl Acad USA 84:6619–6623

    Google Scholar 

  • Linskens HF, Jackson, JF (1986) Modern methods of plant analysis, New series vol 2, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Springer-Verlag Berlin New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsmaier FM, Skoog F (1965) Physiol Plant 8:100–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Lone MI, Kueh JSH, Wyn Jones RG, Bright SWJ (1987) J Expt Bot 38:477–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahler HR, Cordes EH (1966) Biological Chemistry, Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moftah AE, Michel BE (1987) Plant Physiol 83:238–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeman M, Aviv D, Degani H, Galun E (1985) Plant Physiol 77:374–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey R, Ganapathy PS, (1985) Plant Sci 40:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Stidham MA, Moreland DE, Siedow JN (1983) Plant Physiol 73:517–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Troll W, Lindsay J (1955) J Biol Chem 215:655–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren RS, Gould AR (1982) Z Pflanzenphpysiol 107:347–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Watad AA, Reinhold L, Lerner HR (1983) Plant Physiol 73:624–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthrich K (1976) NMR in biological research: Peptides and proteins. American Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. Widholm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodriguez, M.M., Heyser, J.W. Growth inhibition by exogenous proline and its metabolism in saltgrass (Distichlis spicata) suspension cultures. Plant Cell Reports 7, 305–308 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269924

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269924

Keywords

Navigation