Skip to main content
Log in

Production of second generation triploid and tetraploid rainbow trout by mating tetraploid males and diploid females — Potential of tetraploid fish

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

First generation tetraploids were produced by hydrostatic pressure treatment before the first cleavage and raised until the adult stage. Their survival and growth were severely depressed when compared to the diploid control: after two years, no ovulated females were found although males produced sperm at 1 and 2 years of age and were mated individually with diploid females. The progenies were consistently normal with high survival rates. They were found to be almost all triploids by karyology, which failed to detect a significant rate of aneuploidies. However, the fertilizing ability of tetraploid males was always low (0 to 97% of the control; average 40%). Several arguments presented here support the hypothesis that diploid spermatozoas, which are wider than haploid ones, would be frequently blocked during their penetration through the micropyle canal. Second generation tetraploids were produced after such matings by heat shocks, causing the retention of the second polar body. Their survival and growth were much more satisfactory than in the first generation, although still lower than in diploid and triploid controls issuing from diploid parents. Performances of second generation triploids were comparable to those of diploids, and slightly better than those of conventional triploids issuing from diploid parents. 94.5% of the second generation tetraploids were male.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allendorf FW (1975) Genetic variability in a species possessing extensive gene duplication: genetic interpretation of duplicate loci and examination of genetic variation in populations of rainbow trout. PhD Thesis, University of Washington

  • Beetscheen JC (1962) Sur la descendance de femelles tétraploides croisées avec des mâles diploides, chez l'amphibien urodèle, Pleurodeles waltlii. C R Acad Sci 255:3068–3070

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetschen JC (1967) Cinq générations d'individus polyploides chez le triton Pleurodeles waltlii Michah. C R Soc Biol 161:930–936

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell CA, Chrisman CL, Libey GS (1985) Polyploidy induced by heat shock in chanell catfish. In: 2nd Int Symp Genet Aquacult. Davis Calif (Abstr)

  • Billard R (1974) L'insémination artificielle de la truite Salmo gairdneri R. IV. Effet des ions K et Na sur la conservation de la fertilité des gamètes. Bull Fr Pisc 256:88–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham ET (1980) Maximizing heterozygosity in autopoly-ploids. In: Lewis WH (ed) Polyploidy, biological relevance, part IV. Plenum Press, New York, pp 471–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee A, Avery A (1937) Methods of inducing doubling of chromosomes in plants. J Hered 28:393–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevassus B, Quillet E, Chourrout D (1984) La production de truites stériles par voie génétique. Pisc Fr 78:10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevassus B, Quillet E, Blanc JM (1985) Relative Performances of diploids, auto- and allotriploids in salmonids. In: 2nd Int Symp Genet Aquacult. Davis Calif (Abstr)

  • Chourrout D (1980) Thermal induction of diploid gynogenesis and triploidy in the eggs of the rainbow trout (Salmog airdneri R.). Reprod Nutr Dévelop 20:727–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Chourrout D (1982) Tetraploidy induced by heat shocks in the rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri R.). Reprod Nutr Develop 22:569–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Chourrout D (1984) Pressure-induced retention of second polar body and suppression of first cleavage in rainbow trout: production of all-triploids, all-tetraploids, Heterozygous and homozygous diploid gynogenetics. Aquaculture 36:111–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Chourrout D (1985) Extensive karyological investigations permitting the choice between different methods of gynogenesis and polyploidy induction in rainbow trout In: 2nd Int Symp Genet Aquacult. Davis Calif (Abstr)

  • Chourrout D, Quillet E (1982) Induced gynogenesis in the rainbow trout: sex and survival of progenies. Production of all-triploid populations. Theor Appl Genet 63:201–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Chourrout D, Itskovich J (1983) Three manipulations permitted by artificial insemination in tilapia: induced diploid gynogenesis, production of all-triploid populations and intergeneric hybridization. In: Fishelson L, Yaron Z (eds) Int Symp on tilapia in Aquacult. Tel Aviv University, Israel, pp 246–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement WM Jr, Lehman WF (1962) Fertility and cytological studies of a dihaploid plant of alfalfa, Medicago saliva L. Crop Sci 2:451–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Davisson MT (1969) Cytogenetic analysis of two teleost families, Salmonidae and Esocidae. PhD Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, 118 pp

  • Dawson GWP (1962) An introduction to the cytogenetics of polyploids. Blackwell Sci Publ, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Demarly Y (1963) Génétique des tétraploides et amélioration des plantes. Ann Amelior Plant 13:307–400

    Google Scholar 

  • DiBernardino MA (1979) Nuclear and chromosomal behavior in amphibian nuclear transplants. Int Rev Cytol (Suppl) 9:129–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbier MW (1974) The use of haploid-derived autotetraploids to study maximum heterozygosity in alfalfa. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin

  • Ellerström S, Sjödin J (1974) Studies on the use of induced autopolyploidy in the breeding of red clover. 3. Frequency and behavior of aneuploids in a tetraploid clover Ley. Z Pflanzenzücht 71:253–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser G, Humphrey RR (1950) Chromosome number and development of progeny of triploid Axolotl females mated with diploid males. J Exp Zool 115:207–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser G, Humphrey RR (1959) The origin of spontaneous heteroploids in the progeny of diploid, triploid and tetraploid Axolotl females. J Exp Zool 142:379–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier V (1966) Gynogenèse diploide et polyploide réalisée expérimentalement chez le triton Pleurodeles waltlii. C R Soc Biol 160:1526–1531

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischberg M (1958) Experimental tetraploidy in newts. J Embryol Exp Morphol 6:393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg AS (1963) Sperm-egg association and its relationship to the activation of the egg in salmonoid fishes. J Embryol Exp Morphol 11:13–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold JR, Gall GAE (1975) Chromosome cytology and poly-morphism in California High Sierra golden trout (Salmoa guabonita). Can J Genet Cytol 17:41–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurdon JB (1959) Tetraploid frogs. J Exp Zool 141:519–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyomard R (1984) High level of residual heterozygosity in gynogenetic rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri, Richardson. Theor Appl Genet 67:307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Hougas RW, Peloquin SJ (1958) The potential of potato haploids in breeding and genetic research. Am Potato J 35:701–707

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey RR, Fankhauser G (1949) Three generations of polyploids in ambystomid salamanders. J Hered 40:7–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaylet A (1979) Tétraploidie expérimentale chez le triton Pleurodeles waltlii Michah. Chromosoma 38:173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaylet A, Ferrier V (1978) Expérimental gynogenesis in the newt species Pleurodeles waltlii and P. poireti. Chromosoma 69:65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawamura T, Hishioka M (1967) On the sex and reproductive capacity of tetraploids in amphibians. Gunma Symp Endocrinol 7:23–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawamura T, Nishioka M (1983) Reproductive capacity of male autotetraploid Rana nigromaculata and male and female amphidiploids produced from them by mating with female diploid Rana brevipoda. Sci Rep Lab Amphibian Biol Hiroshima Univ 6:1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawamura T, Nishioka M, Okumoto H (1983) Production of autotetraploids and amphidiploids from auto- and allotriploids in Rana nigromaculata and Rana brevipoda. Sci Rep Lab Amphibian Biol Hiroshima Univ 6:47–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihara H (1951) Triploid watermelons. Proc Am Soc Sci 58:217–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi W, Yamamoto TS (1981) Fine structure of the micropylar apparatus of the chum salmon egg, with a discussion of the mechanism for blocking polyspermy. J Exp Zool 217:265–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee GM, Wright JE Jr (1981) Mitotic and meiotic analyses of brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis. J Hered 72:321–327

    Google Scholar 

  • May B (1980) The salmonid genome: evolutionary restructuring following a tetraploid event. PhD Thesis. Pennsylvania State University, University Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza HA, Haynes FL (1974) Genetic basis of yield in the autotetraploid potato. Theor Appl Genet 45:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers JM (1985) Tetraploid induction in Oreochromis species. In: 2nd Int Symp Genet Aquacult. Davis Calif (Abstr)

  • Nebel BR (1937) Mechanisms of polyploids through colchicine. Nature 140:1101

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishioka M, Ueda H (1983) Studies on polyploidy in Japanese treefrogs. Sci Rep Lab Amphibian Biol Hiroshima Univ 6:207–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Obajimi AO, Bingham ET (1973) Inbreeding cultivated alfalfa in one tetraploid-haploid-tetraploid cycle: effects on morphology, fertility and cytology. Crop Sci 13:36–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno S, Stenius C, Faisst E, Zenzes MT (1965) Post-zygotic chromosomal rearrangements in rainbow trout (Salmoirideus Gibbons). Cytogenetics 4:117–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons JE, Thorgaard GH (1985) Production of androgenetic diploid rainbow trout. J Hered 76:177–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Randolph LF (1942) Influence of heterozygosis on fertility and vigor in autotetraploid maize. Genetics 27:163

    Google Scholar 

  • Reindschmidt DC, Simon SJ, Volpe EP, Tompkins R (1979) Production of tetraploid and homozygous diploid amphibians by suppression of first cleavage. J Exp Zool 210:137–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanovsky A, Spicarova N (1961) The production of tetraploid newts by Fischberg's method. Folia Biol (Prague) 7:395–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakharov W, Kuvarin W (1970) Aneuploidy in tetraploid rye. Genetika 6:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Streisinger G, Walker C, Dower N, Rnauber D, Singer F (1981) Production of clones of homozygous diploid zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio). Nature 291:293–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Szöllösi D, Billard R (1974) The micropyle of trout eggs and its reaction to different incubation media. J Microsc (Paris) 21:55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorgaard GH (1976) Robertsonian polymorphism and constitutive heterochromatin distribution in chromosomes of the rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Cytogenet Cell Genet 17:174–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorgaard GH, Jazwin ME, Stier AR (1981) Polyploidy induced by heat shock in rainbow trout. Trans Am Fish Soc 110:546–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorgaard GH, Allendorf FW, Knudsen KL (1983) Genecentromere mapping in rainbow trout: high interference over long map distance. Genetics 103:771–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenti RG (1975) Induced polyploidy in Tilapia aurea (Steindachner) by means of temperature shock treatment. J Fish Biol 7:519–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe K (1983) Studies on the control of diploid-like meiosis in polyploid taxa of chrysanthemum. 4. Colchiploids and the process of cytogenetical diploidization. Theor Appl Genet 66:9–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by H. Abplanalp

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chourrout, D., Chevassus, B., Krieg, F. et al. Production of second generation triploid and tetraploid rainbow trout by mating tetraploid males and diploid females — Potential of tetraploid fish. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 72, 193–206 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266992

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266992

Key words

Navigation