Skip to main content
Log in

Anther culture in Helianthus annuus L., influence of genotype and culture conditions on embryo induction and plant regeneration

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Production of microspore-derived embryos from cultured anthers is now a well established technique for the isolation of homozygous lines in many crop plants. We describe here a culture method for embryo induction and plant regeneration from anthers of four sunflower genotypes. For preliminary experiments, anthers of uninucleate microspores were cultured on four types of basal media viz., Murashige and Skoog's MS, Gamborg's B5, Nitsch and Nitsch, and White's W, supplemented with 1.0 mg/l 2,4 dichlorophenoxy acetic acid and 0.5 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine and 40 g/l sucrose. MS basal medium, being more responsive for embryo induction, was used for further experimentation. To optimise the culture requirement MS basal medium was supplemented with 0.2–2.0 mg/l 2,4 dichlorophenoxy acetic acid and 0.5 and 1.0 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine. The effect of cold pretreatment, hormone regime and sucrose concentration were tested for embryogenic efficiency. Genotype had a significant effect on the capacity of embryo induction. Addition of silver nitrate (2.5 mg/l), an ethylene inhibitor, stimulated embryo germination. Plantlets were obtained (10–15%) from embryos of only one genotype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2,4-D:

2,4 dichlorophenoxy acetic acid

NAA:

α-naphthalene acetic acid

IAA:

indole-3-aceticacid

BAP:

6-benzylaminopurine

KN:

Kinetin

ABA:

abscisic acid

GA3 :

gibberellic acid

References

  • Brown DCW and Antanassov H (1985) Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 4:119–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien YE and Kao KN (1983) Can J Bot 61:639–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho Uh-Hiang and Kasha KJ (1989) Plant Cell Rep 8:415–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu CC, Hill RD and Brule-Babel AL (1990) Plant Sci 66:255–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunwell JM (1979) J Exp Bot 30:419–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunwell JM, Cornish M and Courel AGLDE (1985) J Exp Bot 36:679–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunwell JM, Francis RJ and Powell W (1987) Theor Appl Genet 74:60–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunwell JM and Thurling N (1985) J Exp Bot 36:1478–1491

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Espinasse A, Charles Lay and Vilin J (1989) Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 17:171–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg AA, Choi JH Lubich WB and Sung ZR (1984) Planta 162:532–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer JJ (1987) Plant Cell Rep 6:372–374

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foroughi-Wehr B, Friedt W and Wenzel G (1982) Theor Appl Genet 62:233–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA and Ojima K (1968) Exp Cell Res 50:151–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gelebart P and San LH (1987) Agronomie (Paris) 7:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco B, Tanzarella OA Carrozzo G and Blanco A (1984) Plant Sci 36:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerel A, Nichterlein K and Friedt WL (1991) Plant Breed 106:68–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller WA, Arnison PG and Cardy BJ (1987) In: Green CE, Somers DA, Hackelt WP and Bieshoer DD (eds) Plant Tissue and Cell Culture. Alan R Liss Inc., New York, Vol 3, pp 223–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz SM and Linberger RD (1983) J Am Soc Hort Sci 108:710–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeri PA, Hilderbrandt DF and Collins GB (1987) Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 10:197–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheswari SC, Rashid A and Tyage AK (1982) Am J Bot 69:865–879

    Google Scholar 

  • Miah MAA, Earle ED and Khush GS (1985) Theor Appl Genet 70:113–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T and Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nitsch JP and Nitsch C (1969) Science 163:85–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson KE and Everett NP (1985) Plant Sci 42:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Power CJ (1987) Am J Bot 74:497–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Rines HW (1983) Crop Sci 23:268–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouston JP, Latche A and Fallot J (1990) Plant Sci 67:89–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma GS, Bello LL and Sapru VT (1980) Euphytica 29:751–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland N, Huang B and Hill GJ (1984) J Exp Bot 35:251

    Google Scholar 

  • Thengane SR, Shrikhande MS and Mascarenhas AF (1990) Fifth Int Youth Course Conf in Genet 11–14 Sept, Albena, Bulgaria

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasiljevic L, Atlagic J and Skoric D (1990) Ann Biol (Ludhiana) 6:147–152

    Google Scholar 

  • White PR (1963) In: The Culture of Animal and Plant Cells, The Ronald Press Co., New York, pp59

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan H, Wu Y Chen X, Wei Z-Y, Zhou C and Yang H-Y (1985) Acta Bot Sin 27:13–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by M. R. Davey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thengane, S.R., Joshi, M.S., Khuspe, S.S. et al. Anther culture in Helianthus annuus L., influence of genotype and culture conditions on embryo induction and plant regeneration. Plant Cell Reports 13, 222–226 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239897

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239897

Keywords

Navigation