Skip to main content
Log in

Electrophysiological correlates of visual perceptual masking in monkeys

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Monkeys were trained to discriminate with nearly 100% accuracy between a square and a triangle presented simultaneously in a brief tachistoscopic flash. Perceptual masking was demonstrated by inability to perform this trained visual discrimination at better than chance level when the information flash was followed in less than 20 msec by a blank second flash. In order to determine the nature and locus of this retroactive visual perceptual masking effect, electrical potentials were recorded simultaneously from three points along the optic pathways: optic nerve or tract, lateral geniculate body, and visual cortex. Potentials were computer-averaged and correlated with the monkey's ability or inability to make a correct behavioral response to the information contained in the first or test flash (T). When the perception of T was masked by the second or blanking flash (B), only the evoked potential characteristic of B was observed at all recording sites, including the optic nerve or tract. This suggested that the interaction underlying masking occurred in the retina since optic nerve or tract responses are dependent upon retinal ganglion cells. When T was not masked, an early portion of the evoked response to T could be detected at all recording sites. Perception of T was possible when only the initial segment of the T-potential (15 msec or less) was present at each recording site. Thus the visual information transfer essential to the performance of an already learned visual discrimination task appears to occur very early in the course of the evoked response and is not dependent upon later or secondary components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins, J.W., L.G. Fehmi and D.B. Lindsley: Perceptual discrimination in monkeys: Retroactive visual masking. Physiol. Behav. (in p (1968).

  • Battersby, W.S., and I.H. Wagman: Neural limitations of visual excitability. I. The time course of monocular light adaptation. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 49, 752–759 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Neural limitations of visual excitability. IV. Spatial determinants of retrochiasmal interaction. Amer. J. Physiol. 203, 359–365 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxt, N.:Über die Zeit, welche nötig ist, damit ein Gesichtseindruck zum Bewußtsein kommt, und über die Größe (Extension) der bewußten Wahrnehmung bei einem Gesichts-eindrucke von gegebener Dauer. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 4, 325–336 (1871).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, R.M.: Some temporal factors in vision. In: Sensory Communication, pp. 739–756. Ed. by W.A. Rosenblith. New York: Wiley 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, R. M., and H.M. Triedman: A psychophysical and electrophysiological study of light adaptation. J. exp. Psychol. 46, 125–134 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, R.C.: An investigation of the latency hypothesis of perceptual interference resulting from successive visual presentations. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, J.: The inertia of the eye and brain. Brain 8, 295–312 (1885).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B.H.: Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli. Proc. roy. Soc. B 134, 283–302 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donchin, E., and D.B. Lindsley: Retroactive brightness enhancement with brief paired flashes of light. Vision Res. 5, 59–70 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, S.: Über die zu einer Gesichtswahrnehmung nötige Zeit. Sitzungsber. Wien. Akad. Wiss. 58, 601–632 (1868).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehmi, L.G.: Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual masking in monkeys. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • — and T.H. Bullock: Discrimination among total patterns of stimulation in a computer model of a coelenterate nerve net. Kybernetik 5, 240–249 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel, D.H., and T.N. Wiesel: Integrative action in the oat's lateral geniculate body. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 155, 385–398 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 160, 106–154 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, G.L.: A psychological study of some monocular and binocular factors in early adaptation. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Rochester (1958).

  • Kinsbourne, M., and E.K. Warrington: Further studies on the masking of brief visual stimuli by a random pattern. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 14, 235–245 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolers, P.A.: Intensity and contour effects in visual masking. Vision Res. 2, 277–294 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and B.S. Rosner: On visual masking (metacontrast): dichoptic observation. Amer. J. Psychol. 73, 2–21 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, D.B.: Electrophysiology of the visual system and its relation to perceptual phenomena. In: Brain and Behavior, Vol. I, pp. 359–392. Ed. by M.A.B. Brazier. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Biological Sciences 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, W.H., and S.A. Talbot: Recent evidence for neural mechanisms in vision leading to a general theory of sensory acuity. In: Visual Mechanisms, Vol. VII, pp. 117–164. Ed. by H. Klüver. Lancaster, Pa.: Jaques Cattell Press 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, P.H.: Monoptic and dichoptic visual masking by patterns and flashes. J. exp. Psychol. 69, 193–199 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Monoptic and dichoptic visual masking. J. exp. Psychol. 66, 386–393 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spehlmann, R.: The averaged electrical responses to diffuse and to patterned light in the human. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 19, 560–569 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, G.: What visual masking can tell us about temporal factors in perception. In: Proc. XVIIth Int. Congr. Psychol., pp. 199–200. Amsterdam: North Holland 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, J.M.: The fine structure of psychological time. In: Information Theory in Psychology, pp. 174–207. Ed. by H. Quastler. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturr, J.F., and W.S. Battersby: Neural limitations of visual excitability. VII. Binocular convergence in cat geniculate and cortex. Vision Res. 6, 401–419 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Toch, H.H.: The perceptual elaboration of a stroboscopic presentation. Amer. J. Psychol. 69, 345–358 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H.: Studies in contour. I. Qualitative analysis. Amer. J. Psychol. 59, 324–338 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by grants from the Office of Naval Research (Nonr-4756) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA NGL 05-007-049). Aided by National Institute of Mental Health Training Grant 5 TI MH-6415.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fehmi, L.G., Adkins, J.W. & Lindsley, D.B. Electrophysiological correlates of visual perceptual masking in monkeys. Exp Brain Res 7, 299–316 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00237318

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00237318

Key Words

Navigation