Skip to main content
Log in

Transient transformation of pollen and embryogenic tissues of white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench.) Voss) resulting from microprojectile bombardment

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detailed analyses of the physical parameters inherent in the microprojectile bombardment technology necessary to produce optimum transient β-glucuronidase (GUS) expression were undertaken in pollen and embryogenic tissues of white spruce. Higher helium pressure used for microprojectile bombardment resulted in lower GUS expression in pollen, but in higher GUS expression in embryogenic tissues. Modification of the osmoticum of the culture medium had a limited effect on GUS transient expression in pollen but substantially increased the transient expression in embryogenic tissues. The viability of transformed pollen was not affected by the bombardment procedure. This is the first detailed analysis of microprojectile bombardment technology reporting the conditions needed for optimum transient transformation of pollen and embryogenic tissues of white spruce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bekkaoui F, Datla RSS, Pilon M, Tautorus TE, Crosby WL and Dunstan DI (1990) Theor Appl Genet 79: 353–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkaoui F, Pilon M, Laine E, Raju DSS, Crosby WL and Dunstan DI (1988) Plant Cell Rep 7: 481–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnboim HC and Doly J (1979) Nucleic Acids Res 7: 1513–1517

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bommineni V, Chibbar R, Datla R and Tsang E (1993) Plant Cell Rep 13: 17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker JL and Kwack BH (1963) Am J Bot 50: 859–865

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell MA, Kinlaw CS and Neale DB (1992) Can J For Res 22: 2014–2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Charest PJ, Caléro N, Lachance D, Datla RSS, Duchesne LC and Tsang EWT (1993) Plant Cell Rep 12: 189–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne LC and Charest PJ (1991) Plant Cell Rep 10: 191–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne LC and Charest PJ (1992) Can J Bot 70: 175–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne LC, Lelu MA, Von Aderkas P and Charest PJ (1993) Can J For Res 23: 312–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis DD, McCabe D, Russell D, Martineil B and McCown BH (1991) Plant Mol Biol 17: 19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis DD, McCabe DE, McInnis S, Ramachandran R, Russell DR, Wallace KM, Martinell BJ, Roberts DR, Raffa KF and McCown BH (1993) Bio/Technology 11: 84–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis DD, Roberts D, Sutton B, Lazaroff W, Webb D and Flinn B (1989) Plant Cell Rep 8: 16–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton D, Roy M, Rueda J, Sindhu R, Sanford J and Mascarenhas J (1992) Plant Mol Biol 18: 211–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA and Bevan MW (1987) EMBO J 6: 3901–3907

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kikkert JR (1993) Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 33: 221–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein TM, Harper EC, Svab Z, Sanford JC, Fromm ME and Maliga P (1988) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 8502–8505

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosugi S, Ohashi Y, Nakajima K and Arai Y (1990) Plant Science 70: 133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier S (1994) Grana (in press)

  • Newton RJ, Yibrah HS, Dong N, Clapham DH and von Arnold S (1992) Plant Cell Rep 11: 188–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishihara M, Ito M, Tanaka I, Kyo M, Ono K, Irifune K and Morikawa H (1993) Plant Physiol 102: 357–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell JA, Roy MK and Sanford JC (1992) In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 28P: 97–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautorus TE, Fowke LC and Dunstan DI (1991) Can J Bot 69: 1873–1899

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay FM (1990) Can J Bot 68: 236–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Twell D, Klein TM, Fromm ME and McCormick S (1989) Plant Physiol 91: 1270–1274

    Google Scholar 

  • Vain P, McMullen MD and Finer JJ (1993) Plant Cell Rep 12: 84–88

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Leede-Plegt LM, van de Ven BCE, Bino RJ, van der Salm TPM and van Tunen AJ (1992) Plant Cell Rep 11: 20–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SM, Thorpe TA and Moloney MM (1989) Plant Cell Rep 7: 704–707

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A.R. Gould

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Yh., Tremblay, F.M. & Séguin, A. Transient transformation of pollen and embryogenic tissues of white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench.) Voss) resulting from microprojectile bombardment. Plant Cell Reports 13, 661–665 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231619

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231619

Keywords

Navigation