Abstract
The present study examines the kinematic features of forelimb movements made by cats reaching for food in horizontal target wells located at different heights and distances. Wrist paths consisted of two relatively straight segments joined at a “via-point” in front of the aperture of the food well. In the initial lift phase, the paw was raised to the via-point in front of the target. In the second, or thrust phase, the paw was directed forward into the food well. During the lift, the paw was moved toward the target primarily by elbow flexion, accompanied by a sequence of biphasic shoulder and wrist movements. Thrust was accomplished primarily by shoulder flexion while the wrist and the paw were maintained at near-constant angles. The animals varied the height of the reach primarily by varying elbow flexion with proportional changes in elbow angular velocity and angular acceleration and with corresponding variations in wrist speed. Thus, cats reached for targets at different heights by scaling a common kinematic profile. Over a relatively large range of target heights, animals maintained movement duration constant, according to a simple “pulse-height” control strategy (isochronous scaling). For reaches to a given target height, animals compensated for variability in peak acceleration by variations in movement time. We examined the coordination between the shoulder and the wrist with the elbow. Early during the lift, peak shoulder extensor and peak elbow flexor accelerations were synchronized. Late during the lift phase, wrist extensor acceleration was found to occur during the period of elbow flexor deceleration. We hypothesize that these linkages could, in part, be due to passive mechanical interactions. To determine how the angular trajectories of the different joints were organized in relation to target location, we plotted joint kinematic changes directly on the wrist and MCP joint paths. These plots revealed that for all target heights and movement speeds, wrist extensor deceleration occurred at approximately the same spatial location with respect to the target. This analysis also demonstrated that the second phase of MCP flexion occurred when the paw was below the lower lip of the food well, while the subsequent extension occurred after the tip cleared this obstacle. During thrust, wrist and MCP angles were maintained, reflecting the need to align the paw within the food well. Our findings suggest that cats plan the reaching phase of prehension as a sequence of discrete movement segments, each serving a particular goal in the task, rather than as an single unit. The presence of straight trajectory segments suggests that cats, like humans, plan movements of their paw in extrinsic rather than joint space.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abend W, Bizzi E, Morasso P (1982) Human arm trajectory formation. Brain 105:331–348
Alstermark B, Lundberg A, Norrsell U, Sybirska E (1981) Integration in the descending motor pathways controlling the forelimb in the cat. 9. Differential behavioural defects after spinal cord lesion interrupting defined pathways from higher centers to motoneurons. Exp Brain Res 42:299–318
Alstermark B, Isa T, Lundberg A, Pettersson L-G, Tantisira B (1993a) Characteristics of target-reaching in cats. II. Reaching to targets at different locations. Exp Brain Res 94:287–294
Alstermark B, Lundberg A, Pettersson L-G, Tantisira B, Walkowska M (1993b) Characteristics of target-reaching in cats. I. Individual differences and intra-individual constancy. Exp Brain Res 94:279–286
Atkeson CG, Hollerbach JM (1985) Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5:2318–2330
Bernstein N (1976) The coordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon, Oxford
Cooper SE, Ghez C (1991) Forelimb reaching in cats with lesions of the deep cerebellar nuclei. Soc Neurosci Abstr 17:1381
Cooper SE, Martin JH Ghez C (1993) Differential effects of localized inactivation of deep cerebellar nuclei on reaching in the cat. Soc Neurosci Abstr 19:1278
Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381–391
Flash T, Hogan N (1985) The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5:1699–1703
Freund H-J, Büdingen HJ (1978) The relationship between speed and amplitude of the fastest voluntary contraction of human arm muscles. Exp Brain Res 31:1–12
Ghez C, Vicario DS (1978) The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. II. Scaling of isometric force adjustments. Exp Brain Res 33:191–202
Ghez C, Vicario D, Martin JH, Yumiya H (1983) Sensory motor processing of targeted movements in motor control. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Motor control mechanism in health and disease. Raven, New York, pp 61–92
Ghez C, Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Christakos CN, Cooper SE (1990) Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 55:837–847
Goodkin HP, Thach WT (1991) Does the cerebellum preferentially control multijoint movements? Soc Neurosci Abstr 17:1380
Gordon J, Ghez C (1987a) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. II. Pulse height control. Exp Brain Res 67:241–252
Gordon J, Ghez C (1987b) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. III. Compensatory adjustments for initial errors. Exp Brain Res 67:253–269
Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (1994) Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability. Exp Brain Res 99:97–101
Gorska T, Sybirska E (1980) Effects of pyramidal lesions on forelimb movements in the cat. Acta Neurobiol Exp 40:843–859
Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM, Agarwal GC (1989) Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom. Behav Brain Sci 12:189–250
Hamming RW (1977) Digital filters. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
Hening W, Favilla M, Ghez C (1988) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. V. Gradual specification of response amplitude. Exp Brain Res 71:116–128
Hogan N (1988) Planning and execution of multijoint movements. Can J Neurol Sci 66:508–517
Hollerbach JM, Flash T (1982) Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement. Biol Cybern 44:67–77
Hoppenfeld S (1976) Physicial examination of the spine and extremities. Appleton and Lange, Norwalk, Conn.
Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16:235–254
Johansson RS, Riso R, Häger C, Bäckström L (1992) Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. I. Changes in load force amplitude. Exp Brain Res 89:181–191
Lee WA, Michaels CF, Pai Y-C (1990) The organization of torque and EMG activity during bilateral handle pulls by standing humans. Exp Brain Res 82:304–314
Martin JH (1993) Differential spinal projections of subregions in the forelimb area of the motor cortex in the cat. Neurosci Lett 159:195–198
Martin JH, Ghez C (1993) Differential impairments in reaching and grasping produced by local inactivation within the forelimb representation of the motor cortex in the cat. Exp Brain Res 94:429–443
Martin JH, Cooper SE, Ghez C (1993) Differential effects of local inactivation within motor cortex and red nucleus on performance of an elbow task in the cat. Exp Brain Res 94:418–428
Martin JH, Cooper SE, Hacking A, Ghez C (1994) Spatial organization of kinematic and dynamic changes during prehension in the cat. Soc Neurosci Abstr 20:1410
Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42:223–227
Poizner H, Mack L, Verfaellie M, Rothi L, Heilman K (1990) Three-dimensional computer graphic analysis of apraxia: neural representations of learned movement. Brain 113:85–101
Sainburg RL, Poizner H, Ghez C (1993) Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. J Neurophysiol 70:2136–2147
Smith JL, Zernicke RF (1987) Predictions for neural control based on limb dynamics. Trends Neurosci 10:123–128
Viviani P, Cenzato M (1985) Segmentation and coupling in complex movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:828–845
Vivani P, McCollum G (1983) The relation between linear extent and velocity in drawing movements. Neuroscience 10:211–218
Vivani P, Terzuolo C (1982) Trajectory determines movement dynamics. Neuroscience 7:431–437
Wann J, Nimmo-Smith I, Wing AM (1988) Relation between velocity and curvature in movement: equivalence and divergence between a power law and a minimum-jerk model. J Exp Psychol 14:622–637
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, J.H., Cooper, S.E. & Ghez, C. Kinematic analysis of reaching in the cat. Exp Brain Res 102, 379–392 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230643
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230643