Skip to main content
Log in

A motor signal and “visual” size perception

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent models of the visual system in primates suggest that the mechanisms underlying visual perception and visuomotor control are implemented in separate functional streams in the cerebral cortex. However, a little-studied perceptual illusion demonstrates that a motor-related signal representing arm position can contribute to the visual perception of size. The illusion consists of an illusory size change in an afterimage of the hand when the hand is moved towards or away from the subject. The motor signal necessary for the illusion could be specified by feedforward and/or feedback sources (i.e. efference copy and/or proprioception/kinesthesis). We investigated the nature of this signal by measuring the illusion's magnitude when subjects moved their own arm (active condition, feedforward and feedback information available), and when arm movement was under the control of the experimenter (passive condition, feedback information available). Active and passive movements produced equivalent illusory size changes in the afterimages. However, the illusion was not obtained when an afterimage of subject's hand was obtained prior to movement of the other hand from a very similar location in space. This evidence shows that proprioceptive/kinesthetic feedback was sufficient to drive the illusion and suggests that a specific three-dimensional registration of proprioceptive input and the initial afterimage is necessary for the illusion to occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson RA, Bracewell RA, Barash M, Gnadt JW, Fogassi L (1990) Eye position effects on visual, memory and saccade-related activity in areas LIP and 7a of macaque. J Neurosci 10:1176–1196

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley GS, Goodwin GM, Kulikowski JJ, Leighton D (1976) Stability of vision with a paralyzed eye (abstract). J Physiol (Lond) 258:65P-66P

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen L, Gray F, Meyrignac C, Dehaene S, Degos JD (1994) Selective deficit of visual size perception — 2 cases of hemimicropsia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57:73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby CL, Duhamel J-R, Goldberg ME (1993) The analysis of visual space by the lateral intraparietal area of the monkey: the role of extraretinal signals. In: Hicks TP, Molotchnikoff S (eds) The visually responsive neuron: from basic neurophysiology to behavior. (Progress in Brain Research, vol 95) Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies P (1973) Effects of movements upon the appearance and duration of a prolonged visual afterimage. 1. Changes arising from the movement of a portion of the body incorporated in the afterimaged scene. Perception 2:147–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Dizio P, Lathan CE, Lackner JR (1993) The role of brachial muscle-spindle signals in assignment of visual direction. J Neurophysiol 70:1578–1584

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer J, Ashton R, Broerse J (1990) Emmert's law in the Ames room. Perception 19:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards W, Boring E (1951) What is Emmert's law? Am J Psychol 64:416–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkelens CJ, Van der Steen J, Steinman RM, Collewijn H (1989) Ocular vergence under natural conditions. I. Continuous changes of target distance along the median plane. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 236:417–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Galletti C, Battaglini PP, Fattori P (1993) Parietal neurons encoding spatial locations in craniotopic coordinates. Exp Brain Res 96:221–229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15:20–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jakobson LS, Carey DP (1991) A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 349:154–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory RL, Wallace JG, Campbell FW (1959) Changes in the size and shape of visual after-images observed in complete darkness during changes of position in space. Q J Exp Psychol 11:54–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Holway AH, Boring EG (1941) Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant. Am J Psychol 54:21–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey NK, Weiskrantz L (1969) Size constancy in monkeys with inferotemporal lesions. Q J Exp Psychol 21:225–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingling CR Jr, Grigsby SS (1990) Perceptual correlates of magnocellular and parvocellular channels: Seeing form and depth in afterimages. Vision Res 30:823–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural objects. In: Long J, Baddeley A (eds) Attention and performance IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M, Rossetti Y (1993) Visuomotor coordination as a dissociable visual function: experimental and clinical evidence. Baillieres Clin Neurol 2:439–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M, Kennedy H, Magnin M (1979) Corollary discharge: its possible implications in visual and oculomotor interactions. Neuropsychologia 17:241–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Koken PW, Erkelens CJ (1993) Simultaneous hand tracking does not affect human vergence pursuit. Exp Brain Res 96:494–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Matin L (1976) A possible hybrid mechanism for modification of visual direction associated with eye movements — the paralyzed eye experiment reconsidered. Perception 5:233–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Merigan WH, Maunsell JHR (1993) How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annu Rev Neurosci 16:369–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillard J, Brouchon M (1974) A proprioceptive contribution to the spatial encoding of position cues for ballistic movements. Brain Res 71:273–284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roll R, Velay JL, Roll J-P (1991) Eye and neck proprioceptive messages contribute to the spatial coding of retinal input in visually oriented activities. Exp Brain Res 85:423–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegal S, Castellan NJ Jr (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbach MJ (1987) Proprioceptive knowledge of eye position. Vision Res 27:1737–1744

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor FV (1941) Change in siz of the after-image induced in total darkness. J Exp Psychol 29:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M (1982) Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RWJ (eds) The analysis of visual behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 549–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungerleider LG, Ganz L, Pribram KH (1977) Size constancy in rhesus monkeys: effects of pulvinar, prestriate, and inferotemporal lesions. Exp Brain Res 27:251–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyke M (1960) Alterations of size constancy associated with brain lesions in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23:253–261

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carey, D.P., Allan, K. A motor signal and “visual” size perception. Exp Brain Res 110, 482–486 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229148

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229148

Key words

Navigation