Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical comparison between powers of maximum likelihood and analysis of variance methods for QTL detection in progeny test designs: the case of monogenic inheritance

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simulations are used to compare four statistics for the detection of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) in daughter and grand-daughter designs as defined by Soller and Genizi (1978) and Weller et al. (1990): (1) the Fisher test of a linear model including a marker effect within sire or grand-sire effect; (2) the likelihood ratio test of a segregation analysis without the information given by the marker; (3) the likelihood ratio test of a segregation analysis considering the information from the marker; and (4) the lod score which is the likelihood ratio test of absence of linkage between the marker and the QTL. In all cases the two segregation analyses are more powerful for QTL detection than are either the linear method or the lod score. The differences in power are generally limited but may be significant (in a ratio of 1 to 3 or 4) when the QTL has a small effect (0.2 standard deviations) and is not closely linked to the marker (recombination rate of 20% or more).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Demenais FM, Murigane C, Bonney GE (1990) Search for faster methods of fitting the regressive models to quantitative traits. Genet Epidemiol 7:319–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Dentine MR, Crown CM (1990) An analytical model for the estimation of chromosome substitution effects in the offspring of individuals heterozygous at a segregating marker locus. Theor Appl Genet 79:775–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Elston RC (1980) A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered 21:523–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Elston RC, Stewart J (1971) Segregation analysis. Curr Dev Anthropol Genet 1:327–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley CS (1991) Use of DNA fingerprints for the detection of major genes for quantitative traits in domestic species. Anim Genet 22:259–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrel FE, Davis CE (1982) A new distribution-free quantile estimator. Biometrika 69:635–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasstedt SJ (19982) A mixed-model likelihood approximation on large pedigrees. Comput Biomed Res 15:295–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott SA, Haley CS (1992) Maximum-likelihood mapping of quantitative trait loci using full-sib families. Genetics 132:1211–1222

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander ES, Botstein D (1989) Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121:185–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Roy P, Elsen JM (1991) Détection de gènes majeurs chez les animaux: apport des marqueurs. Séminaire de Méribel 2, “Marquage moléculaire et sélection”. INRA, Département de génétique et d'amélioration des plantes, pp 79–84

  • Le Roy P, Elsen JM, Knott SA (1989) Comparison of four statistical methods for detection of a major gene in progeny-test design. Genet Sel Evol 21:341–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo ZW, Kearsey MJ (1989) Maximum-likelihood estimation of linkage between a marker gene and a quantitative locus. Heredity 63:401–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo ZW, Kearsey MJ (1991) Maximum-likelihood estimation of linkage between a marker gene and a quantitative locus. II. Application to backcross and doubled haploid populations. Heredity 66:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLachlan GJ, Basford KE (1987) Mixture models: inference and applications to clustering. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean CJ, Morton NE, Yee S (1984) Combined analysis of genetic segregation and linkage under and oligogenic model. Computers and Biomed Res 17:471–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton NE (1955) Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. Am J Hum Genet 7:277–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton NE, MacLean CJ (1974) Analysis of family resemblance. III. Complex segregation of quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet 26:499–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemann-Sorensen A, Robertson A (1961) The association between blood groups and several production characteristics in three Danish cattle breeds. Acta Agric Scand 11:163–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Risch N (1984) Segregation analysis incorporating linkage markers. I. Single-locus models with an application to type-I diabetes. Am J Hum Genet 36:363–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson SP (1989) Detection of linkage between quantitative trait loci and restriction fragment length polymorphisms using inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 77:815–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson SP (1992) Correction: detection of linkage between quantitative trait loci and restriction fragment length polymorphisms using inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 85:110–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller M (1990) Genetic mapping of the bovine genome using deoxyribonucleic acid-level markers to identify loci affecting quantitative traits of economic importance. J Dairy Sci 73:2628–2646

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller M, Genizi A (1978) The efficiency of experimental designs for the detection of linkage between a marker locus and locus affecting a quantitative trait in segregating populations. Biometrics 34:47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller JL (1986) Maximum-likelihood techniques for the mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci with the aid of genetic markers. Biometrics 42:627–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller JL, Kashi Y, Soller M (1990) Power of daughter and granddaughter designs for determining linkage between loci and quantitative trait loci in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 73:2525–2537

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks SS (1938) The large sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. Ann Math Stat 9:60–62

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by E. J. Eisen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Le Roy, P., Elsen, J.M. Numerical comparison between powers of maximum likelihood and analysis of variance methods for QTL detection in progeny test designs: the case of monogenic inheritance. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 90, 65–72 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00220997

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00220997

Key words

Navigation