Skip to main content
Log in

Axis development in avian embryos: the ability of Hensen's node to self-differentiate, as analyzed with heterochronic grafting experiments

  • Published:
Anatomy and Embryology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of experiments consisting of transplantation of Hensen's nodes has been conducted to examine axis development in avian embryos. In the first group of experiments, Hensen's nodes from quail embryos were transplanted homotopically and either isochronically or heterochronically to chick embryos, and the structures derived form the grafted nodes were assessed. The grafted Hensen's nodes typically self-differentiated structures appropriate for their stages, and the host embryos developed normally; the structures formed from grafted tissue usually merged caudally with the comparable host structures. Thus, even when the stages of the donor and host tissues were significantly mismatched (e.g., stage 3 donors and stage 9 hosts or vice versa), the graft was unable to repattern the host's neuraxis, and the host was unable to respecify the types of structures derived from the graft. In the second group of experiments, Hensen's nodes from quail embryos were transplanted to sites located just lateral to Hensen's nodes of host chick embryos, thereby providing the potential for development of additional axes. A single axis always resulted in each case in which further development occurred, with the graft self-differentiating its typical stage-specific structures, all of which merged caudally with comparable host structures. A final group of experiments served principally as a control and tested the ability of a part of Hensen's node, when it was transplanted to the extraembryonic germ cell crescent, to organize an ectopic embryo. In these experiments, the entire thickness and length of each Hensen's node, but only the central one-third to one-half of its width, was transplanted to host blastoderms, yet ectopic embryos, complete with induced neuraxes, were formed. Therefore, a part of Hensen's node has the ability to function fully as an organizer when placed in a conducive environment. Collectively, these results provide further documentation of the strong ability of Hensen's node to self-differentiate, and they suggest that once morphogenetic movements are under way, neuraxial structures can form, and characteristic rostrocaudal patterning of the neuraxis can occur, without sustained influence from Hensen's node.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abercrombie M, Bellairs R (1954) The effects in chick blastoderms of replacing the primitive node by a graft of posterior primitive streak. J Embryol Exp Morphol 2:55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas P, Orts-Llorca F (1974) Induction primaire chez le jeune blastoderme de poulet (Gallus gallus) par greffe du nœud de Hensen de caille (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Acta Anat 89:423–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnell DK, Schoenwolf GC, Ordahl CP (1992) Changes in dorsoventral but not rostrocaudal regionalization of the chick neural tube in the absence of cranial notochord, as revealed by expression of Engrailed-2. Dev Dynamics 193:389–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Dias MS, Schoenwolf GC (1990) Formation of ectopic neurepithelium in chick blastoderms: age-related capacities for induction and self-differentiation following transplantation of quail Hensen's nodes. Anat Rec 229:437–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser RC (1954) Studies on the hypoblast of the young chick embryo. J Exp Zool 126:349–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallera J (1970a) Inductions cérébrales et médullaires chez les oiseaux. Experientia 26:886–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallera J (1970b) Différence de réactivité à l'inducteur neurogène entre l'ectoblaste de l'aire opaque et celui de l'aire pellucide chez le poulet. Experientia 26:1353–1354

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallera J (1971) Primary induction in birds. Adv Morphog 9:149–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallera J (1974a) Régulation des excédents nodaux dans de jeunes blastodermes de poulet. I. Implantation d'un deuxième noeud de Hensen dans la région directement postnodale de la ligne primitive. Arch Biol 85:399–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallera J (1974b) Régulation des excédents nodaux dans de jeunes blastodermes poulet. IL Implantation d'un deuxème noeud de Hensen a l'avant de la ligne primitive. Arch Biol 85:415–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallera J, Ivanov I (1964) La compétence neurogène du feuillet externe du blastoderme de poulet en fonction du facteur ‘temps’. J Embryol Exp Morphol 12:693–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallera J, Nicolet G (1969) Le pouvoir inducteur de l'endoblaste présomptif contenu dans la ligne primitive jeune de poulet. J Embryol Exp Morphol 21:105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Martinez V, Schoenwolf GC (1992) Positional control of mesoderm movement and fate during avian gastrulation and neurulation. Dev Dynamics 193:249–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski CT (1956) The effects of the excision of Hensen's node on the early development of the chick embryo. J Exp Zool 133:301–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski CT (1957) The induction of secondary embryos in the early chick blastoderm by grafts of Hensen's node. Am J Anat 101:101–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski CT (1962) Neural induction and notochord formation by mesoderm from the node area of the early chick blastoderm. J Exp Zool 150:233–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger V, Hamilton HL (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88:49–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara K (1978) ‘Spemann's organizer’ in birds. In: Nakamura O, Toivonen S (eds) Organizer — a milestone of a half-century from Spemann. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam New York, pp 221–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornbruch A, Summerbell D, Wolpert L (1979) Somite formation in the early chick embryo following grafts of Hensen's node. J Embryol Exp Morphol 51:51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt TE (1931) An experimental study of the independent differentiation of the isolated Hensen's node and its relation to the formation of axial and non-axial parts in the chick embryo. J Exp Zool 59:395–427

    Google Scholar 

  • I-Lan N, Shu-Dung T, Sher-Pu S (1965) Studies on the regional responses to inductor of the chick blastoderms of different ages. Acta Anat Sinica 8:324–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikola A (1976) Hensen's node — the “organizer” of the amniote embryo. Experientia 32:269–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillie RC (1965) Histopathologic technique and practical histochemistry, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallion DJ, Shinde VA (1973) Induction in the chick by quail Hensen's node. Experientia 29:321–322

    Google Scholar 

  • New DAT (1955) A new technique for the cultivation of the chick embryo in vitro. J Embryol Exp Morphol 3:326–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolet G (1970) Analyse autoradiographique de la localisation des différentes ébauches présomptives dans la ligne primitive de l'embryon de poulet. J Embryol Exp Morphol 23:79–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolet G (1971) Avian gastrulation. Adv Morphog 9:231–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Placzek M, Tessier-Lavigne M, Yamada T, Jessell T, Dodd J (1990) Mesodermal control of neural cell identity: floor plate induction by the notochord. Science 250:985–988

    Google Scholar 

  • Placzek M, Jessell TM, Dodd J (1993) Induction of floor plate differentiation by contact-dependent, homeogenetic signals. Development 117:205–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawles ME (1936) A study in the localization of organ-forming areas in the chick blastoderm of the head-process stage. J Exp Zool 72:271–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenquist GC (1966) A radioautographic study of labeled grafts in the chick blastoderm. Development from primitive-streak stages to stage 12. Cam Contrib Embryol No. 262, 38:31–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenquist GC (1983) The chorda center in Hensen's node of the chick embryo. Anat Rec 207:349–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders EJ, Prasad S (1986) Epithelial and basement membrane responses to chick embryo primitive streak grafts. Cell Differ 18:233–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenwolf GC, Alvarez IS (1989) Roles of neuroepithelial cell rearrangement and division in shaping of the avian neural plate. Development 106:427–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenwolf GC, Garcia-Martinez V, Dias MS (1992) Mesoderm movement and fate during avian gastrulation and neurulation. Dev Dynamics 193:235–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenwolf GC, Sheard P (1990) Fate mapping the avian epiblast with focal injections of a fluorescent-histochemical marker: ectodermal derivatives. J Exp Zool 255:323–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Selleck MAJ, Stern CD (1991) Fate mapping and cell lineage analysis of Hensen's node in the chick embryo. Development 112:615–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Selleck MAJ, Stern CD (1992) Commitment of mesoderm cells in Hensen's node of the chick embryo to notochord and somite. Development 114:403–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher-Pu S, I-Lan N, Shu-Dung T (1963) Studies on the inductive action of the Hensen's node following its transplantation in ovo to the early chick blastoderm. Acta Biol Exp Sinica 8:441–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher-Pu S, I-Lan N, Shu-Dung T (1965) Experimental analysis on the reactive capacity of the epiblast of the chick blastoderm. Acta Anat Sinica 8:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu-Dung T, I-Lan N, Sher-Pu S (1965) Studies on the inductive action of the Hensen's node following its transplantation in ovo to the early chick blastoderm. II. Regionally specific induction of the node region of different ages. Acta Biol Exp Sinica 10:69–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack JMW, Tannahill D (1992) Mechanism of anteroposterior axis specification in vertebrates. Lessons from the amphibians. Development 114:285–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JL, Schoenwolf GC (1989) Notochordal induction of cell wedging in the chick neural plate and its role in neural tube formation. J Exp Zool 250:49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Spratt NT Jr (1955) Analysis of the organizer center in the early chick embryo. I. Localization od prospective notochord and somite cells. J Exp Zool 128:121–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey KG, Crossley JM, DeRobertis EM, Norris WE, Stern CD (1992) Neural induction and regionalisation in the chick embryo. Development 114:729–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Straaten HWM van, Hekking JWM, Wiertz-Hoessels EJLM, Thors F, Drukker J (1988) Effect of the notochord on the differentiation of a floor plate area in the neural tube of the chick embryo. Anat Embryol 177:317–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakaet L (1964) Diversité fonctionnelle de la ligne primitive du blastoderme de poulet. C R Soc Biol 158:1964–1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakaet L (1965) Résultats de la greffe de nœuds de Hensen d'âge différent sur le blastoderme de poulet. C R Soc Biol 159:232–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakaet L (1981) Neurale inductie bij vogels. K Acad Gen Belg 43:79–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakaet L (1984) Early development of birds. In: LeDouarin N, McLaren A (eds) Chimeras in developmental biology. Academic Press, London, pp 71–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Veini M, Hara K (1975) Changes in the differentiation tendencies of the hypoblast-free Hensen's node during “gastrulation” in the chick embryo. Wilhelm Roux' Arch Entwicklungsmech Org 177:89–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanath JR, Mulherkar L (1972) Studies on self-differentiating and induction capacities of Hensen's node using intracoelomic grafting technique. J Embryol Exp Morphol 28:559–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington CH (1932) Experiments on the development of chick and duck embryos, cultivated in vitro. Philos Trans R Soc Lond [Biol] 221:179–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington CH (1933) Induction by the primitive streak and its derivatives in the chick. J Exp Biol 10:38–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington CH, Schmidt GA (1933) Induction by heteroplastic grafts of the primitve streak in birds. Wilhelm Roux' Arch Entwicklungsmech Org 128:522–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman AJ (1936) Experiments on young chick embryos cultured in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 22:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Willier BH, Rawles ME (1931) The relation of Hensen's node to the differentiating capacity of whole chick blastoderms as studied in chorioallantoic grafts. J Exp Zool 59:429–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodside GL (1937) The influence of host age on induction in the chick blastoderm. J Exp Zool 75:259–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada T, Placzek M, Tanaka H, Dodd J, Jessell TM (1991) Control of cell pattern in the developing nervous system: Polarizing activity of the floor plate and notochord. Cell 64:635–647

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inagaki, T., Schoenwolf, G.C. Axis development in avian embryos: the ability of Hensen's node to self-differentiate, as analyzed with heterochronic grafting experiments. Anat Embryol 188, 1–11 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191446

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191446

Key words

Navigation