Summary
The relative sensitivity of the cotton plant to water stress throughout the growing season was determined to identify when irrigation will have the greatest beneficial effect. Daily plant water stress for 72 different data sets of water applications was correlated to corresponding yield criteria. The magnitude of significant correlation was interpreted as the degree of sensitivity. Plant water stress during square formation and early flowering resulted in fewer bolls to reach maturity, but this detrimental effect was cancelled by the development of bigger bolls due to greater lint growth. This resulted in better seedcotton and lint yields. Flower and boll senescence which resulted from water stress during flowering peak, however, inhibited seedcotton and lint yields. The most pronounced inhibiting effect stress had on yields, was during boll development well after the end of effective flowering, when it inhibited boll development. Stress during ripening of the bolls increased lint and boll development and consequently enhanced yields. When limited quantities of water is available, preference should be given to irrigation during boll development, then by irrigation when the first flowers appear, followed by irrigation during peak flowering. Water should be withheld from opening of the first bolls.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerson RC, Hebert RR (1981) Osmoregulation in cotton in response to water stress. 1. Alterations in photosynthesis, leaf conductance, translocation and ultrastructure. Plant Physiol 67:484
Baker JM, van Davel CH (1988) Water transfer through cotton plants connecting soil regions of differing water potential. Agron J 80:993
Bharambe PR, Varade SB (1980) Effect of plant water deficits on abscission of leaves and fruiting forms in CJ-73 (Gossypium hirsutum). J Maharashtra Agric Univ 5:201
Brown HB, Ware JO (1958) Cotton. New York, McGraw-Hill, 3rd edn, p 404
Constable GA, Hearn AB (1981) Irrigation for crops in a subhumid environment. 6. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of cotton. Irrig Sci 3:17
Cull PO, Hearn AB, Smith RC (1981a) Irrigation scheduling of cotton in a climate with uncertain rainfall. 1. Crop water requirements and response to irrigation. Irrg Sci 2:127
Cull PO, Smith RC, McCaffery (1981b) Irrigation scheduling of cotton in a climate with uncertain rainfall. 2. Development and application of a model for irrigation scheduling. Irrig Sci 2:141
De Bruyn LP (1982) The effect of over-irrigation on the growth and production of Gossypium hirsutum. Irrig Sci 3:177
De Bruyn LP, De Jager JM (1978) A meteorological approach to the identification of drought sensitive periods in feld crops. Agric Meteorol 19:35
De Bruyn LP, Human JJ (1983) Evaluating a moisture stress day in cotton. S Afric J Crop Prod 12:23
Hearn AB, Constable GA (1984) Irrigation for field crops in subhumid environment. 7. Evaluation of irrigation strategies for cotton. Irrig Sci 5:75
Howell TA, Davis KR, McCormick RL, Yamada H, Walhood VT, Meek DW (1984) Water use efficiency of narrow row cotton. Irrig Sci 5:195
Idso SB, Reginato RJ, Farah SM (1982) Soil and atmosphere-induced plant water stress in cotton as inferred from foliage temperatures. Water Resour Res 18:1143
Jones JL, Zur B (1984) Simulation of possible adaptive mechanisms in crops subjected to water stress. Irrig Sci 6:251
Kaore SV, Bathkal BG (1982) Effect of soil moisture stress on growth and yield of rainfed cotton. Punjabrao Krishi Vidyapeeth Res 6:19
Krieg DR, Sung FJM (1978) Source-sink relation of cotton as affected by water stress during boll development. Proc Beltwide Botton Prod Res Conf: 302
Leach JE, Woodhead T, Day W (1982) Bias in pressure chamber measurements of leaf water potential. Agric Meteorol 27:257
Meron M, Gromes DW, Phene CJ, Davis KR (1987) Pressure chamber procedures for leaf water potential measurements of cotton. Irrig Sci 8:215
Meyer WS, Reicosky DC (1985) Enclosing leaves for water potential measurement and its effect on interpreting soil-induced water stress. Agric For Meteorol 35:187
Plaut Z, Carmi A (1984) High frequency drip irrigation of cotton: effects on plant development and productivity. Agron Abstr 134
Reicosky DC, Meyer WS, Shaffer NL, Sides RD (1985a) Cotton response to short term waterlogging imposed with water table gradient facility. Agric Water Manage 10:127
Reicosky DC, Smith RC, Meyer WS (1985b) Foliage temperature as means of detecting stress of cotton subjected to a short term water table gradient. Agric Meteorol 35:193
Ritchie JT (1973) Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resour Res 8:1204
Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EH (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148:339
Turner NC (1981) Techniques for experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant Soil 58:339
Turner NC, Hearn AB, Begg JE, Constable GA (1986) Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum): physiological and morphological responses to water deficits and their relationship to yield. Field Crops Res 14:153
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Kock, J., de Bruyn, L.P. & Human, J.J. The relative sensitivity to plant water stress during the reproductive phase of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Irrig Sci 11, 239–244 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190539
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190539