Abstract
The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at 0.5 T. To our knowledge no previous studies of MRCP have been performed at mid-field strength. Thirty-one patients with dilated biliary systems were examined with three-dimensional MRCP. All patients were studied with a 0.5 T superconducting magnet. A three-dimensional turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence was acquired (TR = 3000 ms, TE = 700 ms, echo train length = 45; acquisition time = 14 min 10 s). Coronal images were post-processed with the MIP algorithm. Recently, the parameters have been optimised (TR = 3000 ms, TE = 700 ms, echo train length =128), reducing the acquisition time to 3 min. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed in 26 cases; 5 patients underwent percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography PTC. MRCP and ERCP images were evaluated by an experienced radiologist and an endoscopist. MRCP of diagnostic quality was acquired in all patients. Choledocholithiasis was correctly evaluated by MRCP in 12 of 12 patients, compared with 11 correct diagnoses by ERCP. The presence and the level of the stricture were accurately shown in 16 of 16 patients with MRCP and in 13 of 16 patients with ERCP. The peripheral biliary tree above the obstruction and pancreatic duct were better evaluated by MRCP in all cases. In 3 of 3 patients who had undergone bilio-enteric surgery, a correct evaluation of the site of the anastomosis was possible with MRCP. It is concluded that MRCP performed at mid-field strength allows good visualisation of the dilated biliary system. Excellent results have been obtained on comparison with ERCP. MRCP performed at mid-field strength could have the same clinical value as high field strength MRCP.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun ANG (1994) Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography. AJR 163: 847–850
Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun ANG (1994) Diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Radiology 193: 134P
Hall-Crags MA, Allen CM, Owens CM, et al (1993) MR cholangiography: clinical evaluation in 40 cases. Radiology 189: 423–427
Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, Friedrich JM (1991) Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2 weighted CE-FAST sequence. Radiology 181: 805–808
Morimoto K, Shimoi M, Shirakawa T, et al (1992) Biliary obstruction: evaluation with three-dimensional MR cholangiography. Radiology 183: 578–580
Laubenberger J, Buechert M, Guiler H, et al (1995) MR cholangiography with the RARE technique: a new projection method for examination of the bile and pancreatic ducts. Magn Reson Med 33: 18–23
Takehara Y, Ichijo K, Tooyama N, et al (1994) Breath hold MR cholangiopancreatography with a long-echo-train fast spin echo sequence and a surface coil in chronic pancreatitis. Radiology 192: 73–78
Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barrish M, Chuttani M, Ferrucci JT Jr, Shah J (1994) MR cholangiopancreatography: sequence optimization, new techniques and early clinical experience. Radiology 193: 433P
Reinhold C, Bret PM, Guibaud L, Genin G, Atri M (1994) MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 193: 434P
Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barrish M, Chuttani M, Ferrucci JT Jr, Shah J (1994) MR cholangiopancreatography: correlation with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 193: 133P
Macaulay SE, Schulte SJ, Obregon RG, et al (1994) Non-breath-hold MR cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Radiology 193: 133P
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Correspondence to: P. Pavone
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pavone, P., Laghi, A., Catalano, C. et al. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at 0.5 T: technique optimisation and preliminary results. Eur. Radiol. 6, 147–152 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00181131
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00181131