Abstract
Rats were trained to discriminate between two compound stimulus arrays that included exteroceptive (ES) and interoceptive (IS) stimulus components. The ES components were illumination and tactile cues, and the IS components were produced by d-amphetamine (A) or Na pentobarbital (P) treatment (drug versus drug discrimination). The relative ES-IS strength was then determined by testing with “mismatched” stimulus arrays consisting of combinations of ES and IS components that had not been presented simultaneously during training. Additional tests were done with ES only (no drug treatments). At training doses of 0.8 mg/kg A versus 10 mg/kg P, the ES were less salient than, but did share stimulus control with, the stronger IS components. In a second group, trained with lower doses (0.5 mg/kg A versus 4 mg/kg P), the ES were much more salient than the IS, although again, both types of stimuli did acquire some control. This dose-related sharing of stimulus control between ES and IS components is similar to relationships among components of compound arrays consisting entirely of ES, and thus further illustrates similarity between drug-produced and exteroceptive stimuli.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barry III H, Krimmer EC (1978) Pharmacology of discriminative drug stimuli. In: Ho BT, Richards III DW, Chute DL (eds) Drug discrimination and state dependent learning. Academic Press, New York, pp 3–32
Connelly JF, Connelly JM, Epps JO (1973) Disruption of dissociated learning in a discrimination paradigm by emotionally-important stimuli. Psychopharmacologia 30:275–282
Duncan PM, Phillips J, Reints J, Schechter MD (1979a) Interaction between discrimination of drug states and external stimuli. Psychopharmacology 61:105–106
Duncan PM, Negin AE, Cook NC (1979b) Discriminative stimuli: Drug states compared to external stimulus sources. Paper presented at American Psychological Association Convention, New York City, August 25th
Iversen SD, Iversen LL (1981) Behavioral pharmacology (2nd edition) Oxford University Press, New York
Jarbe TUC, Johansson B (1984) Interaction between drug discriminative stimuli and exteroceptive sensory signals. Behav Neurosci 98:686–694
Jarbe TUC, Swedberg MBD (1982) A conceptualization of drug discrimination learning. In: Colpaert FC, Slangen JL (eds) Drug discrimination: Applications in CNS pharmacology, Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 327–341
Jarbe TUC, Laaksonen T, Svensson R (1983) Influence of exteroceptive contextual conditions upon internal drug stimulus control. Psychopharmacology 80:31–34
Jarbe TUC, Swedberg MBD, Hiltunen AJ (1984) Conditioning of drug discriminative stimuli — ethanol and pentobarbital. Acta pharmacologia et toxicologia, vol 55. Supplement 1, abstr 6
Kilbey MM, Harris RT, Aigner TG (1971) Establishment of equivalent external and internal stimulus control of an operant behavior and its reversal. Proc Am Psychol Assoc 6:767–768
Krimmer EC, Benson BJ, McGuire MS, Barry III H (1982) Conditional sensory stimuli during morphine discrimination. In: Colpaert FC, Slangen JL (eds) Drug discrimination: Applications in CNS pharmacology. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 135–145
Mackintosh NJ (1974) The psychology of animal learning. Academic Press, London, pp 579–588
Overton DA (1968) Visual cues and shock sensitivity in the control of T-maze choice by drug conditions. J Comp Physiol Psychol 66:216–219
Overton DA (1971) Discriminative control of behavior by drug states. In: Thompson T, Pickens R (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs. Appleton Century Crofts, New York, pp 87–110
Overton DA (1982) Memory retrieval failures produced by changes in drug state. In: Isaacson RL, Spear NE (eds) The expression of knowledge: Neurobehavioral transformations of information into action. Plenum Press, New York, pp 113–139
Overton DA (1984) State dependent learning and drug discriminations. In: Iversen LL et al. (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol 18. Plenum Press, New York, pp 59–127
Richards III DW (1978) A functional analysis of the discriminative stimulus properties of amphetamine and pentobarbital. In: Ho BT, Richards III DW, Chute DL (eds) Drug discrimination and state dependent learning. Academic Press, New York, pp 227–247
Schechter MD (1981) Rapid acquisition of a two-drug discrimination: Time of day effect upon saline state. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 14:269–271
Schuster CR, Balster RL (1977) The discriminative stimulus properties of drugs. In: Thompson T, Dews PB (eds) Advances in behavioral pharmacology, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 85–138
Spear NE (1981) Extending the domain of memory retrieval. In: Spear NE, Miller RR (eds) Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms, Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp 341–378
Swedberg MBD, Jarbe TUC (1985) Drug discrimination procedures: Roles of relative stimulus control in two-drug cases. Psychopharmacology 86:444–451
Witkin JM, Carter RB, Dykstra LA (1980) Discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine-pentobarbital combinations. Psychopharmacology 68:269–276
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duncan, P.M. The effect of training dose on discrimination of compound drug-exteroceptive stimuli. Psychopharmacology 90, 543–547 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174076
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174076