Abstract
Young calves were vaccinated with Belgian foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccine and revaccinated with either the same vaccine or with a foreign FMD vaccine.
There was a significant serological response to the primary vaccine strains after the first vaccination which was greater following revaccination. At one and two months after revaccination there was no significant difference between the responses to revaccination with vaccine identical to the primary vaccine or with the foreign FMD vaccine.
It was concluded that revaccination of young calves is effective even with an FMD vaccine different from the primary vaccine.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahl, R. and Wittmann, G. 1985. Further studies on the assessment of potency of FMD vaccines by means of antibody assays with sera from vaccinated cattle. In: Report of the session of the research group of the standing technical committee of the European Commission for the control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 15–18 October 1985, (FAO, Rome), 45–49
Alonso Fernandez, A., Casas de Olascoaga, R., Auge de Mello, P., Fernandez, G. and Mazzuca, G. 1986. The evolution of the FMD virus C3 Argentina in the field. In: Report of the session of the research group of the standing technical committee of the European Commission for the control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Madrid, Spain, 14–17 October 1986, (FAO, Rome), 42–48
Barteling, S.J., Boerke, J. and Woortmeyer, R. 1986. Use of monoclonal antibodies for ‘surface scanning’ of different field and vaccine strains of A-type FMD virus: new approach of strain identification? In: Report of the session of the research group of the standing technical committee of the European Commission for the control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Madrid, Spain, 14–17 October 1986, (FAO, Rome), 32–34
Bolin, S.R., McClurkin, A.W. and Coria, M.F. 1985. Effects of BVD virus on the percentages and the absolute numbers of circulating B and T lymphocytes in cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 46 (4), 884–886
Brun, A., Chappuis, G., Favre, H., Roulet, C. and Terré, G. 1976. Utilisation chez les jeunes bovins du vaccin antiaphteux en adjuvant huileux. Developments in Biological Standardization, 35, 117–122
Dannacher, G., Fedida, M. and Moussa, A. 1987. MD: immunosuppressive effects of BVD virus. Sciences de Vétérinaire Médecine Comparée, 89 (1/2), 45–58
Darbyshire, J.H., Hedger, R.S. and Arrowsmith, A.E.M. 1972. Comparative complement fixation studies with strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Journal of Hygiene, 70, 171–180
DeClercq, K., Strobbe, R., Vanopdenbosch, E. and Debecq, J. 1987. Simultaneous FMD/IBR vaccination of two-month-old calves. In: Report of the session of the research group of the standing technical committee of the European Commission for the control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Lyon, France, 22–25 September 1987, (FAO, Rome), 87
DeSimone, F., Barei, S. and Panina, G.F. 1978. Data on FMD virus of type A isolated in Italy in 1977-Effect of vaccination and revaccination with a heterologous strain. In: Report of the session of the research group of the standing technical committee of the European Commission for the control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Ukkel, Belgium, 14–16 June 1978, (FAO, Rome), 128–129
Edwards, S., Wood, L., Hewitt-Taylor, C. and Drew, T.W. 1986. Evidence for an immunocompromising effect of bovine pestivirus on bovid herpesvirus 1 vaccination. Veterinary Research Communications, 10 (4), 297–302
Ferris, N.P. 1988. Selection of FMD antisera for diagnosis by Elisa. Revue Scientifique et Technique, Office International des Epizooties, 7(2), 331–346
Golding, S.M., Hedger, R.S. and Talbot, P. 1976. Radial immuno-diffusion and serum-neutralization techniques for the assay of antibodies to swine vesicular disease. Research in Veterinary Science, 20, 142–147
Gomes, I. 1984. Observations on the influence of colostral antibodies on the anamnestic response of calves revaccinated against Foot-and-Mouth Disease. Boletin del Centro Panamericano de Fiebre Aftosa, 49–50, 23–26
Kasza, L., Shadduck, J.A. and Christoffinis, G.J. 1972. Establishment, viral susceptibility and biological characteristics of a Swine Kidney cell line SK-6. Research in Veterinary Science, 13, 46–51
Ketelsen, A.I., Johnson, D.W. and Muscoplat, C.C. 1979. Depression of bovine monocyte chemotactic responses by BVD virus. Infection and Immunity, 25 (2), 565–568
Lombard, M., Detraz, N., Dauvergne, M., Préaud, J-M. and Mougeot, H. 1986. Identification of European and Asian FMDV strains by subtyping and by electrofocussing applied to viral proteins. In: O.I.E. 17th Conference of the Commission of FMD, Paris, 1986, 1, 196–222
Lombard, M., Ravin, J., Dufour, R., Dupasquier, M., Roulet, C. and Rey, A. 1982. Appreciations des souches virales aphteuse par des méthodes biologiques et biochimiques. In: O.I.E. 16e Conférence de la Commission de la Fièvre Aphteuse, Paris, 1982, 1, 273–290
Mackowiak, C., Fontaine, J., Lang, R., Camand, R. and Petermann, H. 1962. Etude de la durée de l'immunité conférée par le vaccin antiphteux aux jeunes bovins. Bulletin de l'Office International des Epizooties, 57, 937–948
Markham, R.J.F. and Ramnaraine, M.L. 1985. Release of immunosuppressive substances from tissue culture cells infected with BVD virus. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 46 (4), 879–883
Mowat, G., Prince, M., Owen, H. and Taylor, W. 1975. Results of a small scale trial in Nigerian cattle of Foot-and-Mouth Disease vaccines produced from local virus strains. Bulletin de l'Office International des Epizooties, 83, 283–296
Nicholls, M., Black, L., Rweyemamu, M., Genovese, J., Ferrari, R., Hammant, C., DeSilva, E. and Umehara, O. 1984. The effect of maternally derived antibodies on the response of calves to vaccination against Foot-and-Mouth Disease. Journal of Hygiene, 92, 105–116
Roth, J.A., Bolin, S.R. and Frank, D.E. 1986. Lymphocyte blastogenesis and neutrophil function in cattle persistently infected with BVD virus. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 47 (5), 1139–1141
Roth, J.A. and Kaerberle, M.L. 1982. Effects of a modified live BVD virus vaccine and ACTH on bovine granulocyte function. Journal of the Reticuloendothelial Society, 32 (1), 80
Roth, J.A. and Kaerberle, M.L. 1983. Suppression of neutrophil and lymphocyte function induced by a vaccinal strain of BVD virus with and without the administration of ACTH. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 44 (12), 2366–2372
Roth, J.A., Kaerberle, M.L. and Griffith, R.W. 1981. Effects of BVD virus on bovine polymorphonuclear leukocyte function. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 42 (2), 224–250
Shankar, H. and Uppal, P.K. 1982. Immune response of newborn calves to vaccination with Foot-and-Mouth Disease vaccine. Revue Scientifique et Technique, Office International des Epizooties, 1 (2), 403–414
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. 1973. Introduction to Biostatistics, (W.H. Freeman, San Francisco)
Strobbe, R., DeClercq, K., VanOpdenbosch, E., Wellemans, G. and Debecq, J. 1988. Serological response to foot-and-mouth disease vaccination in cattle of different ages. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift, 57 (3), 199–206
Szent-Ivanyi, T., Kucsera, G., Tuboly, S., Bognar, K., Kiss, Z. and Bernath, S. 1981. Immunogenicity of the attenuated BVD vaccine Vedevac and an inactivated FMD virus vaccine applied alone or simultaneously (in Hungarian, with English abstract). Magyar Allatorvosok Lapja, 36 (6), 369–373
Tekerlekov, P., Urechev, K., Nikolova, E., Génov, I., Tzutzumanski, V., Kirilov, N. and Genchev, G.A. 1980. Trial for specific calf immunoprophylaxis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (in Bulgarian, with English abstract). Veterinarno-Meditsinki Nauki (Sofia), 17 (2), 28–34
Uppal, P.K., Kumar, S., Das, S.K. and Bhatt, P.N. 1975. FMD vaccination in newly born calves. Indian Veterinary Journal, 52 (4), 282–288
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Clercq, K., Strobbe, R., Vanopdenbosch, E. et al. Serological response to a booster foot-and-mouth disease vaccination with strains different from the primary vaccine. Vet Res Commun 13, 199–204 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142045
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142045