Skip to main content
Log in

Biomaterials in the reconstruction of the human middle ear

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The use of biomaterials for reconstruction of the ossicular chain in middle ear involves a different approach from that associated with other regions of the organism. The features of the implantation site and the composition of the prosthesis are responsible for functional failures that result from deterioration or extrusion of the implant. Since the fifties, different types of materials, both biological and synthetic, have been employed in the attempt to achieve the ideal middle ear prosthesis. We present a reprospective study of 166 patients who underwent ossicular chain reconstruction involving autografts and homografts of cartilage or auditory ossicle (n=104) or synthetic prostheses (n=62). We compare prostheses of different compositions on the basis of the cases of extrusion and the histological deterioration encountered with each. In our experience, polymers are associated with frequent extrusion and deterioration of the biomaterial, while the results are better with biological implants and those made of hydroxyapatite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. SILVERSTEIN, A. B. MCDANIEL and R. LICHTENSTEIN, Laryngoscope 96 (1986) 159.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. D. L. SMYTH, Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 90 (1982) 343.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. J. SHEA, J. R. EMMETT and G. D. L. SMYTH, ORL 39 (1977) 9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. ZOLLNER, J. Laryngol. Otol. 69 (1955) 637.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. WULLSTEIN, Laryngoscope 66 (1956) 1076.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. SHEA, Laryngoscope 86 (1976) 239.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. L. SHEEHY, Clin. Otolaryngol. 3 (1978) 451.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Wullstein, In Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 104 (1953) p. 104.

  9. J. J. SHEA and C. A. HOMSY, Laryngoscope 84 (1974) 1835.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. J. SHEA and J. R. EMMETT, Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 104 (1978) 191.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. C. Shea, in Proceedings of the Shea-Shambaugh 5th International Workshop on Middle Ear Microsurgery and Fluctuant Hearing Loss (1976) p. 348.

  12. D. E. BRACKMANN and J. L. SHEEHY, Laryngoscope 89 (1979) 108.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. W. BLAYNEY, J. P. BEBEAR, K. R. WILLIAMS and M. PORTMANN, J. Laryngol. Otol. 100 (1986) 1359.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. RECK and J. HELM, Am. J. Otol. 6 (1985) 280.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. BABIGHIAN, Am. J. Otol. 6 (1985) 285.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. A. RAMIREZ-CAMACHO, Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 107 (1981) 608.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. N. MERCHANT and J. B. NADOLJr., Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am. 27 (1994) 813.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. E. GLASSCOCK, C. J. JACKSON and G. W. KNOX, Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 114 (1988) 1252.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. J. GROTE, W. KUIJPERS and K.De GROOT, ORL 43 (1981) 248.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. J. GROTE, C. A.Van BLITTERSWIJK and W. KUIJPERS, Am. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 95 (Suppl. 123) (1986) 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinilla, M., García Berrocal, J.R., Ramírez-Camacho, R. et al. Biomaterials in the reconstruction of the human middle ear. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 6, 745–748 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134311

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134311

Keywords

Navigation