Skip to main content
Log in

On the invariance of the hybrid position/force control

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, the noninvariance nature of the Raibert and Craig hybrid control scheme, based on the work of Mason and others, has been pointed out. In fact, on the basis of the screw theory, Lipkin and Duffy demonstrated that the selection of the position and force controlled degrees of freedom in the Raibert and Craig scheme, may give wrong results if a translation or change in unit length of the coordinate frame is performed. A general theoretical solution to this problem, called ‘kinestatic filtering’, has been given by Lipkin and Duffy. In this paper, the two approaches are summarized and discussed. First, the conditions in which the Mason filtering technique fails are determined and, second, the situations where the Lipkin and Duffy approach cannot be applied owing to degeneracy of the twist and wrench spaces, are reported. As a consequence of this analysis, a new invariant kinestatic filtering method is proposed. The method here presented is based on the original Mason approach and requires the definition of a task-dependent filter based on the knowledge of the position of the compliant frame. Examples are presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An, C.H. and Hollerbach, J.M., 1987, Kinematic stability issues in force control of manipulators, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, pp. 897–903.

  • Ball, R.S., 1900, A Treatise on the Theory of Screws, Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, S.L., 1985, Generating compliant motion of objects with an articulated hand, Tech. Rep. AI-TR 1029, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaverini, S. and Sciavicco, L., 1988, Force/position control of manipulators in task space with dominance in force, Prep. 2nd IFAC Symp. on Robot Control, SYROCO'88, pp. 51.1–51.7, Karlsruhe, F.R.G.

  • Craig, J.J., 1986, Introduction to Robotics, Mechanics and Control, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J.J. and Raibert, M.H., 1979, A systematic method of hybrid position/force control of a manipulator, Proc. IEEE Computer Applications Conf., Chicago.

  • De Luca, A., Manes, C., and Nicolo', F., 1988, A task space decoupling approach to hybrid control of manipulators, Prep. 2nd IFAC Symp. on Robot Control, SYROCO'88, pp. 54.1–54.6, Karlsruhe, F.R.G.

  • Hunt, G.M., 1978, Kinematic Geometry of Mechanism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathib, O. and Burdick, J., 1986, Motion and force control of robot manipulators, Proc. 3rd IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation, S. Francisco, CA, pp. 1381–1386.

  • Lipkin, H., 1985, Geometry and mapping of screws with applications to the hybrid control of robotic manipulators, PhD. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

  • Lipkin, H. and Duffy, J., 1985, The elliptic polarity of screws, Trans. ASME J. Mechanism, Transmission, and Automation in Design 107, 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipkin, H. and Duffy, J., 1988, Hybrid twist and wrench control for a robotic manipulator, Trans. ASME J. Mechanism, Transmission, and Automation in Design 110, 138–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loncarie, J., 1985, Geometrical analysis of compliant mechanisms in robotics, PhD dissertation, Division of Applied Sciences, Harward University, Cambridge, MA.

  • Mason, M.T., 1978, Compliance and force control for computer controlled manipulators, MS Thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

  • Mason, M.T., 1981, Compliance and force control for computer controlled manipulators, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. SMC-11, 418–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plücker, J., 1865, Phil. Trans. Royal Society of London, Vol. 155, On a New Geometry of Space, London, pp. 727–791.

  • Plücker, J., 1866, Phil. Trans. Royal Society of London, Vol. 156, Fundamental Views Regarding Mechanisms, London, 361–380.

  • Primrose, E.F.J., 1988, Unpublished contribution, Pure Mathematics Dept., University of Leicester, U.K.

  • Raibert, M.H. and Craig, J. J., 1981, Hybrid position/force control of manipulators, ASME J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 105, 126–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, H. and Asada, H., 1985, A method for the design of hybrid position/force controllers for manipulators constrained by contact with the environment, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, St. Louis, pp. 251–259.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abbati-Marescotti, A., Bonivento, C. & Melchiorri, C. On the invariance of the hybrid position/force control. J Intell Robot Syst 3, 233–250 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126071

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126071

Key words

Navigation