Skip to main content
Log in

Characterisation of protoplasts from hypocotyls of Helianthus annuus in relation to their tissue origin

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cells and protoplasts isolated from three different tissues of sunflower hypocotyls and cultured either in liquid or agarose medium were compared in terms of their volume, DNA content, division potential and embryoid formation. Epidermal and external cortical cells differ from other tissue cells by their small size, their weak response to plasmolysis and their low DNA content (around 1C). They contribute only very weakly to the dividing protoplast population. In contrast, protoplasts from cortical and medullar cells both have similar division potential, reaching 50%. The nuclear DNA content of these two cell types, as well as their corresponding protoplasts, has a 2C value, taking root tip cells in G0 phase as standard. The culture conditions induce the same specific response in protoplasts isolated from both tissues: exclusively loose colony formation in liquid medium, and mainly production of embryoids in agarose medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alibert G, Aslane-Chanabé C & Burrus M (1994) Sunflower tissue and cell cultures and their use in biotechnology. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 32:(1): 31–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg A R, MacDonald I R, Hart J W & Gordon D C (1986) Relative elemental elongation rates in the etiolated hypocotyl of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) — A comparison of straight growth and gravitropic growth. Bot. Gaz. 147: 373–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallini A & Lupi M C (1987) Cytological study of callus and regenerated plants of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Breed. 99: 203–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallini A, Natali L, Cionini G, Sassoli O, Cionini P G & Durante M (1992) Nuclear DNA content variations in sunflower. In 13th Int. Sunflower Conf., Vol II (pp 1432–1437). Pisa (Italy)

  • Chanabé C, Burrus M & Alibert G (1989) Factors affecting the improvement of colony formation from sunflower protoplasts. Plant Sci. 64: 125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanabé C, Burrus M, Bidney D & Alibert G (1991) Studies on plant regeneration from protoplasts in the genus Helianthus. Plant Cell Rep. 9: 635–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijak M, Smith D L, Wilson T J & Brown D C W (1986) Stimulation of direct embryogenesis from mesophyll protoplasts of Medicago sativa. Plant Cell Rep. 5: 468–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Emons A-M (1994) Somatic embryogenesis: cell biological aspects. Acta Bot. Neerl. 43: (1): 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher C & Hahne G (1992) Structural analysis of colonies derived from sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) protoplasts cultured in liquid and semi-solid media. Protoplasma 169: 130–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN & Michayluk M R (1980) Plant regeneration from mesophyll protoplasts of alfalfa. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 96: 135–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi S, Ilceda I & Uchimiya H (1985) Conditions for high frequency embryogenesis from orange (Citrus sinensis Obs.) protoplasts. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 4: 249–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi M, Tarquini F, Sgorbati S & Sparvoli E (1986) Determination of DNA content by static fluorimetry in nuclei released from fixed plant tissues. Protoplasma 132: 64–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L C & Kohlenbach H W (1982) Somatic embryogenesis in quite a direct way in cultures of mesophyll protoplasts of Brassica napus L. Plant Cell Rep. 1: 209–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey K & Topping J F (1993) Embryogenesis: a question of pattern. J. Exp. Bot. 44: 359–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorz H, Potrykus I & Thomas E (1977) Somatic embryogenesis from tobacco protoplasts. Naturwiss. 64: 439–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer Y & Abel W O (1975) Importance of the wall for cell division and in the activity of the cytoplasm in cultured tobacco protoplasts. Planta 123: 33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Molz F J & Boyèr J S (1978) Growth-induced water potentials in plant cells and tissues. Plant Physiol. 62: 423–429

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill C M & Mathias R J (1993) Regeneration of plants from protoplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana via direct embryogenesis. J. Exp. Bot. 44 (267): 1579–1585

    Google Scholar 

  • Potrykus I & Shillito R D (1986) Protoplasts: isolation, culture, plant regeneration. In: Weissbach A & Weissbach H (Eds) Plant Molecular Biology, Vol 118: (pp 549–578). Academic Press

  • Schilde-Rentschler L (1977) Role of the cell wall in the ability of tobacco protoplasts to form a callus. Planta 135: 177–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Sgorbati S, Levi M, Sparvoli E, Trezzi F & Lucchini G (1986) Cytometry and flow cytometry of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained suspensions of nuclei released from fresh and fixed tissues of plants. Physiol. Plant. 68: 471–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil I (1987) Developing cell and tissue culture systems for the improvement of cereal and grass crops. J. Plant. Physiol. 128: 193–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Willison J H M (1985) Isolated protoplasts as laboratory tools in the study of cell wall deposition. In: Fowke L C & Constabel F (Eds) Plant Protoplasts (pp 77–89). CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petitprez, M., Brière, C., Borin, C. et al. Characterisation of protoplasts from hypocotyls of Helianthus annuus in relation to their tissue origin. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 41, 33–40 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124084

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124084

Key words

Navigation