Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosome differences in Peromyscus maniculatus populations at different altitudes in Colorado

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mice of the genus Peromyscus all have 48 chromosomes. Yet the appearance of the 48 chromosomes is highly variable from species to species (Hsu & Arrighi, 1966, 1968, 1971; Pathak et al., 1973) and even in different populations of the same species (Sparkes & Arakaki, 1966; Ohno et al., 1966; Hsu & Arrighi, 1968; Arakaki et al. 1970; Te & Dawson, 1971; Bradshaw & Hsu, 1972; Murray & Kitchin, 1976). The evolutionary significance of this variation and the mechanisms for its initiation and maintenance have been of interest for quite a few years. However, it was not until the sophisticated chromosome banding techniques became available that mammalian cytogeneticists were able to begin to study the chromosome variation of Peromyscus in some detail. The use of C-banding led Hsu & Arrighi (1971) to the finding that the short arms of chromosomes in three different species of Peromyscus contained constitutive heterochromatin. These results suggested that the variations in the number of acrocentric chromosomes in Peromyscus might be a result of different amounts of heterochromatin. Later studies (Duffey, 1972; Waterbury, 1972; and Pathak et al., 1973) were also consistent with this hypothesis.

However, it was soon discovered that not all chromosomal differences among Peromyscus populations are due to heterochromatin changes. Studies by Arighi et al. (1976) and Murray & Kitchin (1976) showed that some chromosomal differences between species and subspecies of Peromyscus are due to pericentric inversions. Thus, it appears that both inversions and the addition of heterochromatin are involved in the evolution of the karyotype of Peromyscus.

The purpose of our study was to investigate the chromosomes of Peromyscus maniculatus in different populations in Colorado (U.S.A.) and to test for relationships involving an altitudinal gradient. In the first part of this study, orcein stained chromosomes from three subspecies of mice sampled at nine different altitudes were examined for karyotype variability. In the second part of the study, karyotypes of two subspecies (P. m. rufinus and P. m. luteus), representing high and low altitude populations were examined with Q banding to determine the mechanisms responsible for chromosomal differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arakaki, D.T., I. Veomett & R.S. Sparkes (1970). Chromosome polymorphism in deer mouse siblings (Peromyscus maniculatus). Experientia 26 (1): 425–426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, F.E. & G.F. Saunders (1972). The relationship between repetitious DNA and constitutive heterochromatin with special reference to man. In: Symposia Medica Hoechst 6. Modern Aspects of Cytogenetics: Constitutive Heterochromatin in Man. pp. 113–133. Schattauer-Verlag, Stuttgart/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, F.E., A.D. Stock & S. Pathak (1976). Chromosomes of Peromyscus (Rodentia, Cricetidae). V. Evidence of pericentric inversions. Chromosomes Today 5: 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D.L. & R.J. Baker (1971). Apparent convergence of karyotypes in two species of pocket gophers of the genus Thomomys. Cytogenetics 10: 1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, W.F. (1950). Ecological factors in speciation of Peromyscus. Evolution 4: 253–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, W.N. & T.C. Hsu (1972). Chromosomes of Peromyscus (Rodentia, Cricetidae). III. Polymorphism in Peromyscus maniculatus. Cytogenetics 11: 436–451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caire, W. & E.G. Zimmerman (1975). Chromosomal and morphological variation and circular overlap in the deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus, in Texas and Oklahoma. Syst. Zool. 24: 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Grouchy, J., C. Turleau, C. Finaz & M. Roubin (1975). Chromosome and gene evolution of man and the primates, with a detour through the Felidae. In: Chromosome variations in Human Evolution. A.J. Boyce (ed.). pp. 17–38. Taylor and Francis, Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffey, P.A. (1972). Chromosome variation in Peromyscus: A new mechanism. Science 1976: 1333–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T.C. & F.E. Arrighi (1966). Chromosomal evolution in the genus Peromyscus (Cricetidae, Rodentia). Cytogenetics 5: 355–359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T.C. & E.E. Arrighi (1968). Chromosomes of Peromyscus (Rodentia, Cricetidae). I. Evolutionary trends in 20 species. Cytogenetics 7: 417–446.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T.C. & F.E. Arrighi (1971). Distribution of constitutive heterochromatin in mammalian chromosomes. Chromosoma 34: 243–253.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C.Y. (1956). Extension of multiple range test to group means with unequal numbers of replications, Biometrics 12: 307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreizinger, J.D. & M.W. Shaw (1970). Chromosomes of Peromyscus (Rodentia, Cricetidae). II. The Y chromosome of Peromyscus maniculatus. Cytogenetics 9: 52–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J.D. & R.M. Kitchin (1976). Chromosomal variation and heterochromatin polymorphisms in Peromyscus maniculatus. Experientia 32 (1): 307–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B.A. (1977). Chromosomal variations in populations of Peromyscus maniculatus at different altitudes. M.A. Thesis. University of Colorado at Denver.

  • Ohno, S. (1972). Evolutional reason for having so much junk DNA. In: Symposia Medica Hoechst 6. Modern Aspects of Cytogenetics: Constitutive Heterochromatin in Man. pp. 169–173. Schattauer-Verlag, Stuttgart/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, S., C. Weiler, J. Poole, L. Christian & C. Stenius (1966). Autosomal polymorphism due to pericentric inversions in the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus), and some evidence of somatic segregation, Chromosoma 18: 177–187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, S., T.C. Hsu & F.E. Arrighi (1973). Chromosomes of Peromyscus (Rodentia, Cricetidae). IV. The role of heterochromatin in karyotypic evolution. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 12: 315–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J.L. (1972). Patterns of geographic variation in karyotype in the Pocket gopher, Thomomys bottae (Eydoux and Gervais). Evolution 26: 574–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest, R.L. (1978). A karyotype comparison between two subspecies of Peromyscus maniculatus using Q banding. M.A. Thesis. University of Colorado at Denver.

  • Sparkes, R.S. & D.T. Arakaki (1966). Intrasubspecific and intersubspecific chromosomal polymorphism in Peromyscus maniculatus (Deer Mouse). Cytogenetics 5: 411–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Te, G.A. & W.D. Dawson (1971). Chromosomal polymorphism in Peromyscus polionotus. Cytogenetics 10: 225–234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turleau, C. & J.de Grouchy (1973). New observations on the human and chimpanzee karyotypes. Humangenetik 20: 151–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waterbury, A.M. (1972). Clinal variation in the karyotype of Peromyscus maniculatus (Wagner) from California. Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of Calif. at Davis. Diss. Abstr. Int. 33: 1326B–1327B.

  • Yunis, J.J. (1972). Constitutive heterochromatin and the repeated DNA sequences of mammals. In: Symposia Medica Hoechst 6. Modern Aspects of Cytogenetics: Constitutive Heterochromatin in Man. pp. 5–17. Sehattauer-Verlag, Stuttgart/New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dixon, L.K., Nelson, B.A. & Priest, R.L. Chromosome differences in Peromyscus maniculatus populations at different altitudes in Colorado. Genetica 52, 63–68 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121815

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121815

Keywords

Navigation