Skip to main content
Log in

Machine learning applications in anthropology: Automated discovery over kinship structures

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A common problem in anthropological field work is generalizing rules governing social interactions and relations (particularly kinship) from a series of examples. One class of machine learning algorithms is particularly well-suited to this task: inductive logic programming systems, as exemplified by FOIL. A knowledge base of relationships among individuals is established, in the form of a series of single-predicate facts. Given a set of positive and negative examples of a new relationship, the machine learning programs build a Horn clause description of the target relationship. The power of these algorithms to derive complex hypotheses is demonstrated for a set of kinship relationships drawn from the anthropological literature. FOIL extends the capabilities of earlier anthropology-specific learning programs by providing a more powerful representation for induced relationships, and is better able to learn in the face of noisy or incomplete data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ascher, M. Ethnomathematics: A Multicultural View of Mathematical Ideas. Pacific Grove, CA, USA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Meur, Gisele, Ed. New Trends in Mathematical Anthropology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findler, N.V. and W.R. McKinzie. “On a Computer Program that Generates and Queries Kinship Structures.” Behavioral Science, 14 (1969), 334–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findler, N.V. (1973). “Kinship Structures Revisited.” Behavioral Science, 18 (1969), 68–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findler, N. V. “Automatic Rule Discovery for Field Work in Anthropology.” Computers and the Humanities, 26(4) (1992a), 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findler, N.V. “An Excursion into Social and Cultural Anthropology by Artificial Intelligence — an Automated Discovery System to Identify Rules of Inheritance, Succession, Marriage, Injunction Against Incest, and Exogamy.” Computers in Human Behavior, 8 (1992b), 367–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, C.A. “A Matrix Approach to the Calculus of Kinship Relations.” (In De Meur, 1986), pp. 139–166.

  • Hinton, G.E. “Learning Distributed Representations of Concepts.” Proceedings of the Eight Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum Press, 1986.

  • Holte, R.C. “Very Simple Classification Rules Perform Well on Most Commonly Used Datasets.” Machine Learning, 11 (1993), 63–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, J.R. “Learning Logical Definitions from Relations.” Machine Learning, 5 (1990), 239–266.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cunningham, S.J. Machine learning applications in anthropology: Automated discovery over kinship structures. Comput Hum 30, 401–406 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057936

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057936

Key words

Navigation