Skip to main content
Log in

The use of observational data for formative evaluation of an instructional model

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a study investigating the characteristics of teacher behavior under two different instructional management models and their differential effects on students under an individualized early learning program. The study investigated the effectiveness and feasibility of using observational techniques in classroom settings to obtain information about student learning processes and outcomes necessary for implementing an adaptive early education model. Observational data, records of student progress in he curricula, and records of student learning activities were collected systematically in order to characterize the classroom behaviors of students and teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bolvin, J. O. and Glaser, R. (1971). Individualizing Instruction. In D. W.Allen and E.Seifman (Eds.), The Teacher's Handbook, pp. 270–279. Chicago: Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, W. W. and Lohnes, P. R. (1962). Multivariate Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1971). Adaptive Education. Paper presented at the Conference on University Teaching and Learning, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

  • Glaser, R. (1968). Adapting the Elementary School Curriculum to Individual Performance. In Proceedings of the 1967 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems, Princeton N.J.: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jastak, J. F. and Jastak, S. R. (1965). The Wide Range Achievement Test Wilmington, Del.: Guidance Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindvall, C. M. and Bolvin, J. O. (1966). Individually Prescribed Instruction: The Oakleaf Project. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, Working Paper 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (1967). Design of an Early Learning Curriculum. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, Working Paper 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. C. (1972). An Instruction Manual for the Student Observation Schedule. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. C. (1973). Rationale and Design of an Early Learning Environment. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. C., Mazza, M., Haines, J. and Johnson, M. (1972). Some Measured Effects of a Classroom Management Model Designed for an Individualized Early Learning Curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April.

  • Wang, M. C., Mazza, M., Leinhardt, G. and Millmore, M. (1971). Exploratory Learning Program: A Teacher's Manual. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, J. L. and Lindvall, C. M. (1968). Evaluating an Instructional Innovation Through the Observation of Pupil Activities. The High School Journal, 51(6), 248–253.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Learning Research and Development Center University of Pittsburgh

The research reported herein was supported in part by a grant from the Ford Foundation, and in part by a grant from the United States Office of Education to the Learning Research and Development Center. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the sponsoring agencies and no official endorsement should be inferred.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, M.C. The use of observational data for formative evaluation of an instructional model. Instr Sci 5, 365–389 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051805

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051805

Keywords

Navigation