Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring plant community change: an application of quadrat classification + discriminant analysis

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A procedure for monitoring plant community change was described using data from 189 quadrats (each 0.09 m2 in area) from or near 11 Carex exserta meadow sites in the high Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Initially the quadrats were agglomerated into five clusters by the flexible clustering strategy (beta=−0.25) with the standard absolute distance resemblance function. Data for each quadrat were cover percentages for C. exserta, other plants, litter, soil, gravel, and rock. The five clusters appeared to define a cover gradient, from quadrats with mostly gravel and rock to those with mostly C. exserta, and were accordingly designated pioneer, low seral, mid-seral, high seral, and climax.

Classification functions (from discriminant analysis) are used with values of the variables to classify individual quadrats on sites used to monitor change. A site is characterized at repeated observations by the proportions of quadrats in each class. Within-class (low seral vs. low seral) rather than between-class (pioneer vs. low seral) tests are made for presence of change. Confidence intervals for differences in proportions of quadrats or individual quadrat probabilities of class membership are computed. If the confidence intervals do not cover zero, values for time one versus time two differ significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam P., Birks H.J.B., Huntley B. & Prentice I.C. 1975. Phytosociological studies at Malham Tarn moss and fen, Yorkshire, England. Vegetatio 30: 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin M.P. 1977. Use of ordination and other multivariate descriptive methods to study succession. Vegetatio 35: 165–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyad M.A. & El-Ghonemy A.A. 1976. Phytosociological and environmental gradients in a sector of the western desert of Egypt. Vegetatio 31: 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batanouny K.H. & Zaki M.A.F. 1973. Range potetialities of a sector in the Mediterranean coastal region in Egypt. Vegetatio 27: 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict N.B. 1983. Plant associations of subalpine meadows, Sequoia National Park, California. Arct. Alp. Res. 15: 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, P.S. 1965. An investigation of the impact of grazing on ten meadows in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks. M.S. Thesis, San Jose State College, San Jose, CA.

  • Daubenmire R. 1952. Forest vegetation of northern Idaho and adjacent Washington, and its bearing on concepts of vegetation classification. Ecol. Monogr. 22: 301–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyksterhuis E.J. 1949. Condition and management of range land based on quantitative ecology. J. Range Manage. 2: 104–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon W.J. (ed.) 1983. BMDP statistical software... 1983 printing with additions. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon W.J. & MasseyJr F.J. 1957. Introduction to statistical analysis. 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foran B.D., Bastin G. & Shaw K.A. 1986. Range assessment and monitoring in arid lands: the use of classification and ordination in range survey. J. Environ. Manage. 22: 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker R.B. 1983. Use of reciprocal averaging ordination for the study of range condition gradients. J. Range Manage. 36: 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith P. 1957. Quantitative plant ecology. Academic Press Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson D.A., Gierisch R.K., Stanton W. & Robinson R. 1970. Range condition evaluation by discriminant analysis. Range Sci. Dept. Science Series No. 8. Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klikoff L.G. 1965. Microenvironmental influence on vegetational pattern near timberline in the Central Sierra Nevada. Ecol. Monogr. 35: 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance G.N. & Williams W.T. 1967. A general theory of classificatory sorting strategies. I. Hierarchical systems Comput. J. 9: 373–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Londo G 1974. Successive mapping of dune slack vegetation. Vegetatio 29: 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig J.A. & Reynolds J.F. 1988. Statistical ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosley J.C., Bunting S.C. & Hironaka M. 1986. Determing range condition from frequency data in mountain meadows of central Idaho. J. Range Manage. 39: 561–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci L. 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research, 2nd ed., Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou E.C. 1984. The interpretation of ecological data. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff R.D. 1974. Short-hair sedge... its condition in the high Sierra Nevada of California. Research Note PSW 293. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff R.D. 1985. Meadows in the Sierra Nevada of California: state of knowledge. General Technical Report PSW84. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff R.D. & Westfall S.E. 1973. A simple stereophotographic technique for small plots. J. Range Manage. 26: 147–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • RISC: Range Inventory Standardization Committee, 1983. Guidelines and terminology for range inventories and monitoring. Report to Board of Directors of Society for Range Management. February 1983. Albuquerque, NM.

  • Pater Braak C.J.F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieder R.K., McCormick A.M. & Lang G.E. 1981. Vegetational analysis of Big Run Bog, a nonglaciated Sphagnum bog in West Virginia. Castanea 46: 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youtie B.A., Griffith B. & Peck J.M. 1988. Successional patterns in bitterbrush habitat types in north-central Washington. J. Range Manage. 41: 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ratliff, R.D., Westfall, S.E. Monitoring plant community change: an application of quadrat classification + discriminant analysis. Vegetatio 80, 1–9 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049136

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049136

Keywords

Navigation