Skip to main content
Log in

On selecting indirect ordination methods

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A set of forty stands from an alpine fell-field in the Washington Cascades was used to test these ordination methods: polar ordination, principal components analysis, reciprocal averaging, and multidimensional scalings. Because no object ‘true’ ordination can be known for such data, a series of evaluative methods were employed to characterize each method. These criteria included the rank correlation to a direct ordination based on habitat data, the degree of distortion, skewness, and disjunction revealed, the ability to separate stands, the efficiency of species ordinations, ease of interpretation, objectivity, and how well the method recovers a classification of the same data.

Based on these criteria, reciprocal averaging performs best, with principal components analysis and multidimensional scaling not much worse. Most polar ordinations produce significant disjunctions and fail to separate stands well in one or more dimensions. Both of these properties result from the selection of partially disjunct stands as end points. These conclusions apply only to data with low beta diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, M.P. 1968. An ordination study of a chalk grassland community. J. Ecol. 56: 739–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M.P. 1976. Performance of four ordination techniques assuming three different non-linear species response models. Vegetatio 33: 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M.P. & I., Noy-Meir. 1971. The problem of non-linearity in ordination: experiments with two-gradient models. J. Ecol. 59: 763–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam, G., F.G., Goff & R.H., Whittaker. 1978. Wisconsin comparative ordination. In R.H., Whittaker (ed.), Ordination of plant communities, p. 185–215. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, H.T. & W., Stephenson, 1975. Introduction to numerical classification. Academic Press, New York, 229 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasham, M.J.R. 1977. A comparison of nonmetric and multidimensional scaling: principal components and reciprocal averaging for the ordination of simulated coenoclines. Ecology 58: 551–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.B.Jr. 1973. A quantitative evaluation of the Bray-Curtis ordination. Ecology 54: 829–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.B.Jr. 1977. ORDIFLEX. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 123 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.B.Jr. & T.R., Wentworth, 1976. Canonical correlation analysis as an ordination technique. Vegetatio 33: 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.B.Jr. & R.H., Whittaker, 1972: Comparison of ordination techniques. Ecology 53: 868–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.B.Jr., R.H., Whittaker & T.R., Wentworth. 1977. A comparative study of reciprocal averaging and other ordination techniques. J. Ecol. 65: 157–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, B.A. & D.F. Grigal. 1972. Computer programs for the ordination and classification of ecosystems. Oak Ridge Natl. Lab. ORNL-IBP-71-10.

  • Hitchcock, C.L. & A., Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Univ. Washington Press. Seattle. 730 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O. 1973. Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination. J. Ecol. 61: 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessell, S.R. & R.H., Whittaker. 1976. Comparison of three ordination techniques. Vegetatio 32: 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruscal, J.B. 1964. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 20: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarel, E.van der. 1979. Multivariate methods in phytosociology, with reference to the Netherlands. In: M.J.A., Werger (ed.). The study of vegetation. p. 161–227. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moral, R.del. 1974. Species patterns in the Upper North Fork Teanaway River drainage, Wenatchee Mountains, Washington. Syecis 7: 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moral, R.del. 1979. High elevation vegegation of the Enchantment Lakes basin, Washington. Canad J. Bot. 57: 1111–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moral, R.del & A.F., Watson. 1978. Gradient structure of forest vegetation in the central Washington Cascades. Vegetatio 38: 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I. 1974. Catenation: quantitative methods for definition of coenoclines. Vegetatio 29: 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I. & R.H., Whittaker, 1977. Continuous multivariate methods in community analysis: some problems and developments. Vegetatio 33: 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I. & R.H., Whittaker. 1978. Recent developments in continuous multivariate techniques. In: R.H., Whittaker (ed.), Ordination of plant communities, p. 337–379. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R. 1978. Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range: patterns of species diversity. Vegetatio 37: 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, P.A. 1978. Comparison of techniques for ordinating and classifying old-growth floodplain forests in southern Illinois. Vegetatio 37: 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains. Oregon and Washington. Ecol. Monogr. 30: 279–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. & H.B., GauchJr. 1978. Evaluation of ordination techniques. In R.H., Whittaker (ed.). Ordination of plant communities. p. 277–337. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Nomenclature follows that of Hitchcock & Cronquist (1973)

Funds provided by the University of Washington Graduate School. Field assistance was provided by J.E. Canfield, M.J. Cushman, and A.F. Watson> L.C. Anderson provided helpful comments on the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Del Moral, R. On selecting indirect ordination methods. Vegetatio 42, 75–84 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048873

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048873

Keywords

Navigation