Abstract
A.K. Cajander's forest site type classification system is based on definition of plant communities typical to certain climatical and edaphical site conditions, but the structure and composition of the tree stands in Finland are considered sensitive to random variation and are therefore not used as primary classification criteria. The system has often received criticism, usually that the effects of the tree stand and successional stage of the stand have been underestimated. Most of the present-day forest stands in Finland represent young successional stages and are subjected to intensive management. This should result in an additional difficulty in the application of the forest site types in the field.
The present study is based on three independent data sets representing forests on mineral soil in southern part of Finland. TWINSPAN classification, DCA ordination and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) techniques were applied in successive stages of the data analysis. It was found that the definition of the intermediately fertile, mesic site types was clearly confused by the effects of the tree species and age of the stand. The analyses also revealed that the succession pathways on mesic forest sites are largely determined by the tree species composition. In stands dominated by Pinus sylvestris, the succession follows the competitive hierarchy model, whereas in stands dominated by Picea abies, severe shading of the tree canopy governs the development of understorey vegetation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CCA:
-
Canonical correspondence Analysis
- DCA:
-
Detrended correspondence Analysis
- TWINSPAN:
-
Two-way indicator species analysis
References
Ahti, T., Hämet-Ahti, L. & Jalas, J. 1968. Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 5: 169–211.
Cajander, A. K. 1909. Ueber Waldtypen. Acta For. Fenn. 1(1): 1–176.
Cajander, A. K. 1949. Forest types and their significance. Acta For. Fenn. 56(5): 1–71.
Clements, F. E. 1916. Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 242: 1–512.
Daubenmire, R. 1968. Plant communities: a textbook of plant synecology. 300 p. Harper & Row, New York.
Ferm, A. & Pohtila, E. 1977. Pintakasvillisuuden kehittyminen ja muokkausjäljen tasoittuminen auratuilla metsänuudistusaloilla Lapissa. Abstract: Succession of ground vegetation and levelling of ploughed tracks of reforestation areas in Finnish Lapland. Folia For. 319: 1–34.
Frey, T. E. A. 1978. The Finnish School and Forest-Site Types. In: Whittaker, R. H. (ed.), Classification of Plant Communities, pp. 81–110. The Hague.
Hill, M. O. 1979. TWINSPAN — a FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. 48 pp. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Hill, M. O. & Gauch, H. G. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58.
Hotanen, J.-P. 1988. A study of the forest and peatland site type classification in the Upper Karelia. Unpubl. Lic. Phil. thesis, 191 p. Dept. of Biology, Univ. of Joensuu. (in Finnish).
Hotanen, J.-P. & Kuusipalo, J. 1989. The Finnish forest site type approach: an example of recent developments. In: Sjögren, E. (ed.), Forests of the World: diversity and dynamics (Abstracts). Stud. Plant Ecol. 18: 117–120.
Kalela, A. 1961. Waldvegetationszonen Finnlands und ihre klimatischen Paralleltypen. Arch. Soc. Vanamo 16 (suppl.): 65–83.
Keltikangas, V. 1959. Suomalaisista seinäsammaltyypeistä ja niiden asemasta Cajanderin luokitusjärjestelmässä. Summary: Finnish feather-moss types and their position in Cajander's forest site classification. Acta For. Fenn. 69(2): 1–266.
Kujala, V. 1926. Untersuchungen über die Waldvegetation in Süd- und Mittelfinnland. I. Zur Kenntnis des ökölogisch-biologischen Charakters der Pflanzenarten unter spezieller Berücksichtigung der Bildung von Pflanzenvereinen. A. Gefässpflanzen. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 10(1): 1–154.
Kuusipalo, J. 1985. An ecological study of upland forest site classification in southern Finland. Acta For. Fenn. 192: 1–78.
Kuusipalo, J. 1987. Relative importance of factors controlling the success of Oxalis acetosella: an example of linear modelling in ecological research. Vegetatio 70: 171–179.
Kuusipalo, J. 1988. Dominance pattern with understorey bryophyte vegetation in southern boreal coniferous forests. In: Barkman, J. J. & Sykora, K. V. (eds.), Dependent Plant Communities, pp. 111–117. The Hague, The Netherlands.
Lahti, T. & Väisänen, R. A. 1987. Ecological gradients of boreal forests in South Finland: an ordination test of Cajander's forest site type theory. Vegetatio 68: 145–156.
Lindholm, T. & Vasander, H. 1987. Vegetation and stand development of mesic forest after prescribed burning. Silva Fennica 21: 259–278.
Mikola, P. 1982. Application of vegetation science to forestry in Finland. In: Jahn, G. (ed.), Application of vegetation science to forestry, pp. 199–224. The Hague.
Odum, E. P. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164: 262–270.
Oksanen, J. 1984. Lichen-rich forests and related communities in Finland: ordination and classification studies. University of Joensuu Publications in Sciences 1: 1–35.
Oksanen, J. 1986. Succession, dominance and diversity in lichen-rich pine forest vegetation in Finland. Holarctic Ecology 9: 261–266.
Sepponen, P. 1985. The ecological classification of sorted forest soils of varying genesis in northern Finland. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 129: 1–77.
Sepponen, P., Laine, L., Linnilä, K., Lähde, E. & Roiko-Jokela, P. 1982. Metsätyypit ja niiden kasvillisuus Pohjois-Suomessa. Valtakunnan metsien III inventoinnin (1951–1953) aineistoon perustuva tutkimus. Summary: The forest site types of North Finland and their floristic composition. A study based on the III National Forest Inventory (1951–1953). Folia For. 517: 1–32.
Ter Braak, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.
Ter Braak, C. J. F. 1987. CANOCO — a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by partial detrended canonical correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis. 95 pp. TNO Institute of Applied Computer Science. Wageningen. The Netherlands.
Ter Braak, C. J. F. 1988. CANOCO — an extension of DECORANA to analyze species — environment relationships. Vegetatio 75: 159–160.
Tonteri, T. 1988. The relations between the forest stand and vegetation succession in southern and middle boreal mesic upland forests. Unpubl. M.Sc. thesis, 133 pp. Dept. of Botany, Univ. of Helsinki. (in Finnish).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tonteri, T., Hotanen, J.P. & Kuusipalo, J. The Finnish forest site type approach: ordination and classification studies of mesic forest sites in southern Finland. Vegetatio 87, 85–98 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045658
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045658