Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wetland classification and inventory: A summary

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regional, national and local wetland classifications have been developed and successfully applied. These have invariably been orientated towards conservation and management goals, and the information used to assess wetland loss or to assign management priorities. Existing national and regional classification systems have not only been useful, but they provide an essential base for developing an international system. At the international level, differences among existing systems in the definition of a wetland and how wetland types are defined assume great importance and need to be resolved. Classification is an essential prerequisite for wetland inventory. A number of international inventories have been undertaken, although these have not generally utilized the available high technology and data storage systems available through remote sensing and geographic information systems. More extensive international inventories will require standardization of techniques for data collection, storage and dissemination. A minimum data set needs to be defined with standards for data accuracy. An international committee under the auspices of an international agency (e.g. IWRB, Ramsar Bureau, IUCN) needs to be established to develop an international classification system and guidelines for carrying out a complete inventory of the world's wetlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atta, G. A. M. & Sorensen, U. G. 1992. Waterbird populations and the loss and degradation of wetlands in Egypt. pp. 125–129. In: Finlayson, C. M., Hollis, G. E. & Davis, T. J. (eds), Managing Mediterranean wetlands and their birds. IWRB Special Publication No. 20. IWRB, Slimbridge, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, M. M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4. U.S. Army Engineers Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgis, M. J. & Symoens, J. J. (eds) 1987. African wetlands and shallow water bodies. ORSTOM, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carp, E. 1980. A directory of Western Palearetic wetlands. UNEP, Nairobi & IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casado, S., Florin, M., Molla, S. & Montes, C. 1992. Current status of Spanish wetlands. pp. 56–58. In: Finlayson, C. M., Hollis, G. E. & Davis, T. J. (eds), Managing Mediterranean wetlands and their birds. IWRB Special Publication No. 20. IWRB, Stimbridge, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin, L. M. & Golet, F. C. 1995. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1979 wetland classification — a review. Vegetatio 118 (this issue).

  • Cowardin, L. M., Carter, V., Golet, F. C. & LaRoe, E. T. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS 79/31.

  • DeRoy, R. & Hussain, S. A. (eds) 1993. Directory of Indian wetlands. WWF-India, New Delhi and Asian Wetland Bureau, Kuala Lumpur. 240 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, P. J. 1990. Wetland conservation — a review of current issues and required action. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Defense Fund and World Wildlife Fund. 1992. How wet is a wetland? Environmental Defense Fund, New York, NY and World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Geographic Data Committee, Wetlands Subcommittee. 1994. Strategic interagency approach to developing a national digital wetlands data base (second approximation). Federal Geographic Data Committee, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Orcoyen Tormo, C., Vallecillo, C. G. & Valladares, A. M. 1992. How many inland Mediterranean wetlands will there be in the year 2000? pp. 28–31. In: Finlayson, C. M., Hollis, G. E. & Davis, T. J. (eds), Managing Mediterranean wetlands and their birds. IWRB Special Publication No. 20. IWRB, Slimbridge, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, B. & Sah, M. 1995. Inventory and classification of wetlands in India. Vegetatio 118 (this issue).

  • Gopal, B., Kvet, J., Loffler, H., Masing, V. & Patten, B. C. 1990. Definition and classification. pp. 9–15. In: Patten, B. C. (ed.), Wetlands and shallow continental water bodies. SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmett, R. F. A. & Jones, T. A. 1989. Important bird areas in Europe. ICBP Technical Publication No. 9, ICBP, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heliotis, F. D. 1988. An inventory and review of the wetland resources of Greece. Wetlands 8, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, L. H., Melack, J. M. & Simonett, D. S. 1990. Radar detection of flooding beneath the forest canopy. International Journal of Remote Sensing 11: 1313–1325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, G. E. 1990. Wetland systems: science, management, control and controllers. pp. 20–28. In: Kusler, J. A. & Day, S. (eds), Wetlands and river corridor management. Association of Wetland Managers, Inc, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, G. E. & Jones, T. A. 1991. Europe and the Mediterranean basin. In: Finlayson, M. & Moser, M. (eds), Wetlands. Facts on File, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, G. E., Patterson, J. H., Papayannis, T. & Finlayson, C. M. 1992. Sustaining wetlands: policies, programmes and partnerships. pp. 281–285. In: Finlayson, C. M., Hollis, G. E. & Davis, T. J. (eds), Managing Mediterranean wetlands and their birds. IWRB Special Publication No. 20. IWRB, Slimbridge, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudec, K., Husak, S., Janda, J. & Pellantova, J. 1993. Survey of aquatic and wetland biotopes of the Czech Republic. Czech Ramsar Committee, Trebon, Czech Republic. 32 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. M. R. 1995. The current status of European wetland inventories and classifications. Vegetatio 118 (this issue).

  • Hughes, R. H. & Hughes, S. 1992. A directory of African wetlands. UNEP, Nairobi & IUCN, Gland Switzerland/WCMC, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiderman, E. & Mermet, L. 1991. Mise en Place d'un Observatoire de Zones Humides. Identification de Zones Humides d'Importance Majeure au Plan National. Ministère de l'Environnement — DNP, AIDA & SPRN unpublished report.

  • Lu, J. 1990. Wetlands in China (in Chinese). East China Normal University Press, Shanghai, China. 177 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J. 1995. Ecological significance and classification of Chinese wetlands. Vegetatio 118 (this issue).

  • Luther, H. & Rzoska, J. 1971. Project Aqua: a source book of inland waters proposed for conservation. IBP Handbook No. 21, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maamouri, F. & Hughes, J. 1992. Prospects for wetlands and water-fowl in Tunisia. pp. 47–52. In: Finlayson, C. M., Hollis, G. E. & Davis, T. J. (eds), Managing Mediterranean wetlands and their birds. IWRB Special Publication No. 20. IWRB, Slimbridge, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti, C. 1988. Zones d'Importance Internationale pour les oiseaux d'eau en Suisse; Cartes commentées pour la première révision de l'inventaire, 1987. Station Ornithologique Suisse, Sempach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menantean, L. 1991. Zones humides du littoral de la Communauté Européenne vues de l'espace.

  • Montes, C. & Bifani, P. 1989. An ecological and economic analysis of the current status of Spanish wetlands. Report to OECD, Paris.

  • Nakayama, N. 1993. Monitoring Asian wetlands and lake basins using remote sensing techniques. pp. 39–42 In: Moser, M. E., Prentice, R. C. & van Vessem, J. (eds), Waterfowl and wetland conservation in the 1990s. IWRB Special Publication No. 26.

  • Naranjo, L. G. 1995. An evaluation of the first inventory of South America wetlands. Vegetatio 118 (this issue).

  • Novitzki, R. P. 1995. EMAP-Wetlands: a sampling design with global application. Vegetatio 118 (this issue).

  • Olney, P. (ed.) 1965. Project MAR: list of European and North African wetlands of international importance. IUCN New Series, IUCN, Morges, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakarinen, P. 1995. Classification of boreal mires in Finland and Scandinavia-a review. Vegetatio 118 (this issue).

  • Pressey, R. L. & Adam, P. 1995. A review of wetland inventory and classification in Australia. Vegetatio 118 (this issue).

  • Psilovikos, A. A. 1992. Prospects for wetlands and waterfowl in Greece. pp. 53–55. In: Finlayson, C. M., Hollis, G. E. & Davis, T. J. (eds), Managing Mediterranean wetlands and their birds. IWRB Special Publication No. 20. IWRB, Slimbridge, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. A. 1980. A preliminary inventory of wetlands of international importance for waterfowl in west Europe and northwest Africa. IWRB Special Publication No. 2, IWRB, Slimbridge, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. A. 1989a. Design of wetland data sheets for database on Ramsar sites. Photocopied report to Ramsar Bureau, Gland, Switzerland.

  • Scott, D. A. 1989b. A directory of Asian wetlands. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. A. 1993. A directory of wetlands in Oceania. IWRB, Slimbridge, UK and AWB, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 444 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. A. & Carbonell, M. 1986. A directory of Neotropical wetlands, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. A. & Jones, T. A. 1995. Classification and inventory of wetlands: a global overview. Vegetatio 118 (this issue).

  • Semeniuk, C. A. & Semeniuk, V. 1995. A geomorphic approach to global wetland classification for inland wetlands. Vegetatio 118 (this issue).

  • Silvius, M. J., Djuharsa, E., Taufik, A. W., Steeman, A. P. J. M. & Berczy, E. T. 1987. The Indonesian wetland inventory-a compilation of information on wetlands in Indonesia. PHPA-AWB/Interwader Indonesia & EDWIN, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, R. E., Brown, C. J. & Griffin, M. (eds) 1991. The status and conservation of wetlands in Namibia. Special Edition Madoqua 17, 254 pp.

  • Taylor, A. R. D., Howard, G. W. & Begg, G. W. 1995. Developing wetland inventories in southern Africa: a review. Vegetatio 118 (this issue).

  • Tiner, R. W.Jr. 1974. Wetlands of the United States: current status and recent trends. US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory Project, Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 59 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usbank, S. & James, R. 1993. A directory of important wetlands in Australia. Australian Nature Conservation Agency, Canberra. 687 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilen, B. O. & Bates, M. K. 1995. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's national wetland inventory project. Vegetatio 118 (this issue).

  • Zoltai, S. C. & Vitt, D. H. 1995. Canadian wetlands: environmental gradients and classification. Vegetatio 118 (this issue).

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. C. M. Finlayson

    Present address: Office of the Supervising Scientist, Locked Bag 2, Post Office, NT 0886, Jabiru, Australia

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Waterfowl & Wetland Research Bureau (IWRB), Slimbridge, GL2 7BX, Glos, UK

    C. M. Finlayson

  2. Department of Botany, Iowa State University, 141A Bessey Hall, 50011, Ames, IA, USA

    A. G. van der Valk

Authors
  1. C. M. Finlayson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. G. van der Valk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Finlayson, C.M., van der Valk, A.G. Wetland classification and inventory: A summary. Vegetatio 118, 185–192 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045199

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045199

Key words

Search

Navigation