Skip to main content
Log in

Self-incompatibility in Brassica napus: seed set on crossing 19 self-incompatible lines

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Seed set after self-pollination confirmed that 19 lines of Brassica napus were self-incompatible. Eight lines, H, J, Q, W, X, K, P and Z, were fully cross-compatible. Line R was cross-compatible with these lines but often had a low seed set as female parent. These results are consistent with the activity of nine distinct S-alleles. Line S was cross-incompatible with K, as was V with P, and F with Z. With each of the lines A, E, B, O, G, L and M at least one reciprocal difference was found so that the number of additional distinct S-alleles could not be inferred, but there must be a minimum of seven.

Pollen tube counts of intra- and inter-line pollinations using M, B and X confirmed the homozygosity of these lines with respect to self-incompatibility status and the presence of non-reciprocal compatibility between M and B.

The results are interpreted in terms of the activity of both B. oleracea and B. campestris S-loci and the implications for hybrid breeding are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bateman A.J., 1955. Self-incompatibility systems in Angiosperms. III. Cruciferae. Heredity Lond 9: 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, V.McM., 1938. Root Crops. In: Report of the Scottish Society for Research in Plant Breeding for 1938, pp 28–31.

  • Davey, V.McM., 1958. Root Crops. In: Scottish Plant Breeding Station Report 1958, pp 17–18.

  • Gowers, S., 1973. Hybrid swedes. In: Scottish Plant Breeding Station Annual Report 1972–73, pp 12–13.

  • Gowers S., 1974a. The production of F1 hybrid swedes (Brassica napus ssp. rapifera) by the utilisation of self-incompatibility. Euphytica 23: 205–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowers, S., 1974b. Hybrid swedes. In: Scottish Plant Breeding Station Annual Report 1973–74, pp 12–13.

  • Gowers S., 1975. Methods of producing F1 hybrid swedes (Brassica napus ssp. rapifera). Euphytica 24: 537–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowers S., 1980. The production of hybrid oil-seed rape using self-incompatibility. Eucarpia Cruciferae Newsletter 5: 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowers S., 1981. Self-pollination in swedes (Brassica napus ssp. rapifera) and its implications for cultivar production. Euphytica 30: 813–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowers S., 1982. The transfer of characters from Brassica campestris L. to Brassica napus L.: production of clubroot-resistant oil-seed rape (B. napus ssp. oleifera). Euphytica 31: 971–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowers, S., 1986. Possible applications of self-incompatibility in the production of Brassica napus cultivars. DSIR Plant Breeding Symposium 1986, N.Z. Agronomy Society Special Publication No. 5: 63–66.

  • Heslop-Harrison J. & Y. Heslop-Harrison, 1970. Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence: intercellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate. Stain Technol. 45: 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinata K. & K. Okazaki, 1986. Role of stigma in the expression of self-incompatibility in crucifers in view of genetic analysis. In: D.L. Mulcahy, G.B. Mulcahy & E. Ottaviano (Eds.), Biotechnology and Ecology of Pollen. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin T., 1986. Self-incompatibility reactions in a synthetic Brassica napus line. Eucarpia Cruciferae Newsletter 11: 77–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kho Y.O. & J. Baer, 1968. Observing pollen tubes by means of flurorescence. Euphytica 17: 298–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay G.R., 1976. Self-incompatibility in forage rape, Brassica napus L. var. biennis. Incompatibility Newsletter 7: 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay G.R., 1977a. A diallel cross method for the recognition of S-allele homozygotes in turnip, Brassica campestris L. ssp. rapifera. Heredity 38: 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay G.R., 1977b. The introgression of S-alleles into forage rape, Brassica napus L. from turnip, Brassica campestris L. ssp. rapifera. Euphytica 26: 511–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, G.R., 1977c. Turnip (B. campestris) × rape (B. napus) hybrids. In: Scottish Plant Breeding Station Annual Report 1976–77, pp 32–33.

  • Olsson G., 1960a. Self-incompatibility and outcrossing in rape and white mustard. Hereditas 46: 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson G., 1960b. Species crosses within the genus Brassica. II. Artificial Brassica napus L. Hereditas 46: 351–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson G. & S. Ellerstrom, 1980. Polyploidy breeding in Europe. In: S. Tsunoda, K. Hinata & C. Gomez-Campo (Eds.), Brassica crops and wild allies. Biology and Breeding. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, pp 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards R.A., & N. Thurling, 1973. The genetics of self-incompatibility in Brassica campestris L. ssp. oleifera Metzg. I. Characteristics of S-locus. Control of self-incompatibility. Genetica 44: 428–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K.F., 1957. Self-incompatibility in marrow-stem kale, Brassica oleracea var. acephala. I. Demonstration of a sporophytic system. J Genet 55: 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K.F., 1983. Breeding winter oilseed rape, Brassica napus. In: T.G. Coaker (Ed.), Advances in Applied Biology VII. Academic Press, London, pp 1–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • U., N., 1935. Genome-analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilisation. Jap J Bot 7: 389–452.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gemmell, D.J., Bradshaw, J.E., Hodgkin, T. et al. Self-incompatibility in Brassica napus: seed set on crossing 19 self-incompatible lines. Euphytica 42, 71–77 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042617

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042617

Key words

Navigation