Skip to main content
Log in

Association between partial resistance to S-(2-aminoethyl)L-cysteine and increased methionine levels in inbred lines of rye

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

223 highly inbred lines of winter rye were investigated, using the in vitro culture of mature embryos, for their resistance to lysine structural analogue S-(2-aminoethyl)L-cysteine (AEC). The AEC concentration 0.20 mM was comparable to that in other cereals.

Embryos from ca. 3% of lines developed into plantlets with normal or reduced shoots and were classified as either resistant (r) or partly resistant (pr). The (r) and (pr) traits were recessive, nonallelic and most probably without maternal effect-as suggested by F1 analysis.

The (r) and (pr) lines had not changed the lysine content but surprisingly elevated methionine content. The possible factors which brought about such effect are discussed. Testing of (pr) lines for ethionine resistance showed partial resistance of one of them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bright, S.W.J., P.B., Norbury & B.J., Miflin, 1979. Isolation of a recessive barley mutant resistant to S-(2-aminoethyl)L-cysteine. Theor. Appl. Genet. 55: 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright, S., V. Jarrett, R. Nelson, G. Creissen, A. Karp, J. Franklin, P. Norbury, J. Kueh, S. Rognes & B. Miflin, 1983. Modification of agronomic traits using in vitro technology. In: S.H. Mantell, H. Smith, (Eds). Plant Biotechnology. Cambridge University Press; 251–265.

  • Bryan, J.K. 1980. Synthesis of the aspartate family and branched-chain amino acids. In: B.J. Miflin (Ed). The Biochemistry of Plants vol. 5. Academic Press; 403–452.

  • Chaleff, R.S. & P.S., Carlson, 1974. In vitro selection of mutants of higher plants. In: L., Ledoux (Ed). Genetic manipulation with plant material. Plenum Press, New York, London, pp. 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll, H., B., Køie & B.O., Eggum, 1974. Induced high lysine mutants in barley. Radiation Bot. 14: 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doll, H. & B., Køie, 1975. Evaluation of high lysine barley mutants. In: Breeding for Seed Protein Improvement Using Nuclear Techniques. Vienna, Austria: IAEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovanelli, J., S.H. Mudd & A.H. Datko, 1980. Sulphur amino acids in plants. In: B.J. Miflin (Ed). The Biochemistry of Plants vol. 5. Academic Press; 453–505.

  • Granberg, R.R. 1984. Amino acids analysis for biotechnology, International Biotechnology Laboratory, 20–29.

  • Energy and protein requirements. Rapport of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU. WHO, Geneva, 1985.

  • Harms, Ch.T., I., Potrykus & J.M., Widholm, 1981. Complementation and dominant expression of amino acid analogue resistance markers in somatic hybrid clones from Daucus carota after protoplast fusion. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 101: 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpaisal, R., T., Hashimoto & Y., Yamada, 1988. Selection and characterization of S-(2-aminoethyl)-L-cysteine — resistant wheat cell cultures. J. Plant Physiol. 133: 608–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, J.T. & J.F., Thompson, 1988. Characterization of soybean tissue culture cell lines resistant to methionine analogs. Plant Cell Rep. 7: 473–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, B.F., S.C.H., Shye & J.M., Widholm, 1980. Mechanism of resistance of a selected carrot cell suspension culture to S-(2-aminoethyl)-L-cysteine. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 96: 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T. & F., Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrutiu, I., A., Cattoir-Reynearts, I., Verbruggen & M., Jacobs, 1981. Lysine overproduction in an S-(2-aminoethyl)-cysteine resistant mutant isolated in protoplast culture of Nicotiana silvestris. Archives Intern. de Physiologie et de Biochemie 89: 188–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrutiu, I., A., Cattoir-Reyearts, I., Verbruggen & M., Jacobs, 1984. Lysine overproducer mutants with an altered dihydrodopicolinate synthase from protoplast culture of Nicotiana sylvestris (Spegazzini and Comes), Theor. Appl. Genet. 68: 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redway, F.A. & I.K., Vasil, 1990. Selection of S-(2-aminoethyl)-L-cysteine tolerance in embryogenic calli and regenerated plants of Pennisetum purpureum Schum., Plant Science 67: 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reish, B., S.H., Duke & E.T., Bingham, 1981. Selection and characterization of ethionine-resistant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cell lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 59: 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, G.W. & F.T., Sharpe, 1981. Lysine in seed protein from S-aminoethyl-L-cysteine resistant anther-derived tissue cultures of rice. In Vitro 17: 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, D.W.R. & J.K., Vasil, 1979. Use of amino acid analogueresistant cell lines for selection of Nicotiana sylvestris somatic cell hybrids. Theor. Appl. Genet. 55: 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widholm, J.M. 1976. Selection and characterization of cultured carrot and tobacco cells resistant to lysine, methionine, and proline analogs. Can. J. Bot. 54: 1523–1529.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Śmiech, M., Cywińska-Smoter, E. & Malepszy, S. Association between partial resistance to S-(2-aminoethyl)L-cysteine and increased methionine levels in inbred lines of rye. Euphytica 56, 219–224 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042367

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042367

Key words

Navigation