Skip to main content
Log in

Monogenic control of resistance in the tomato to the tobacco flea beetle: Probable repellance by foliage volatiles

  • Articles
  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In comparisons made under typical summer conditions in the field at Davis, California, the foliage of the anthocyanin-deficient mutant af proved to be much more susceptible to attack by Epitrix hirtipennis (Melsheimer) than that of the isogenic normal line, normal cultivars, or any other tested mutant. Since a relatively uniform level of damage was observed in leaves of various ages that contacted the soil, the interaction is probably of a preference rather than antibiotic nature. A comparison with nine other anthocyaninless mutants proved that anthocyanin deficiency is not responsible for susceptibility. The severe reduction of glandular hairs and consequent lack of foliage aroma—hitherto unsuspected pleiotropic effects of af—probably account for the high susceptibility of this mutant. The evolutionary significance of the distinct foliage aromas characteristic of each tomato species is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burdick, A. B., 1958. New mutants. Rep. Tomato Genetics Coop. 8: 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayberg, C. D., 1971. Report of the gene list committee. Rep. Tomato Genetics Coop. 21: 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, A. G. & A. K. Stoner, 1968a. Damage by larvae of the tobacco flea beetle to tomato seedlings. J. Econ. Entomol. 61: 152–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, A. G. & A. K. Stoner, 1968b. Resistance in Lycopersicon spp. to the tobacco flea beetle. J. econ. Entomol. 61: 1347–1349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, D. J. deB., 1970. Flea beetle attack on glandless cotton in Nigeria. Empire Cotton Grow. Rev. 47 (3): 198–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, R. J., 1951. Insect resistance in crop plants. MacMillan, N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiros, C. F. & D. Hughes 1975. A technique for the capture of foliage volatiles in the tomato species. Rep. Tomato Genetics Coop. 25: 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, A. K., 1970. Breeding for insect resistance in vegetables. HortScience 5 (2): 76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. E., 1955. Inheritance of high total carotenoid pigments in tomato fruits. Science 121: 896–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tressl, R. & W. G. Jennings, 1972. Production of volatile compounds in the ripening banana. Agric. & Food Chem. 20: 189–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenbarger, D. A., 1966. Variations in leaf miner and flea beetle injury in tomato varieties. J. econ. Entomol. 59: 65–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rick, C.M., Quiros, C.F., Harry Lange, W. et al. Monogenic control of resistance in the tomato to the tobacco flea beetle: Probable repellance by foliage volatiles. Euphytica 25, 521–530 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041587

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041587

Index words

Navigation