Skip to main content
Log in

Editing of the chloroplast ndhB encoded transcript shows divergence between closely related members of the grass family (Poaceae)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ndhB-encoded transcript from barley chloroplasts deviates from the genomic ndhB sequence by nine C-to-U transitions, which is the maximum number of editing events for a chloroplast mRNA reported so far. Comparison with ndhB transcripts from other chloroplast species shows that six of the nine editing sites observed in barley are structurally and functionally conserved in maize, rice and tobacco. The remaining three sites, however, show divergent patterns of conservation even within the three members of the grass family. The conservation of two of these sites in tobacco but not in the closely related graminean species suggests that divergence of the ndhB editing sites is caused by the loss of preexisting editing sites rather than by gain of new sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoch B, Maier RM, Appel K, Igloi GL, Kössel H: Editing of a chloroplast mRNA by creation of an initiation codon. Nature 353: 178–180 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kössel H, Hoch B, Maier RM, Igloi GL, Kudla J, Zeltz P, Freyer R, Neckermann K, Ruf S: RNA Editing in chloroplasts of higher plants. In: Brennicke A, Kück U (eds), Plant Mitochondria, pp. 93–102. VHC Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maier RM, Neckermann K, Hoch B, Akhmedov NB, Kössel H: Identification of editing positions in the ndhB transcript from maize chloroplasts reveals sequence similarities between editing sites of chloroplasts and plant mitochondria. Nucl Acids Res 20: 6189–6194 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson C, Barnett LK: Isolation and analysis of chloroplasts. In: Shaw CH (ed), Plant Molecular Biology: A Practical Approach, pp. 67–78. IRL Press, Oxford (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chirgwin JM, Przybyla AE, MacDonald RJ, Rutter WJ: Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry 18: 5294–5299 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maier RM, Hoch B, Zeltz P, Kössel H: Internal editing of the maize chloroplast ndhA transcript restores codons for conserved amino acids. Plant Cell 4: 609–616 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sheen JY, Bogorad L: Differential expression of the ribulose bisphosphat carboxylase large subunit gene in bundle sheath and mesophyll cells of developing maize leaves is influenced by light. Plant Physiol 79: 1072–1076 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB: A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1: 19–21 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bachmann B, Lüke W, Hunsmann G: Improvement of PCR amplified DNA sequencing with the aid of detergents. Nucl Acids Res 18: 1309 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zeltz P, Hess WR, Neckermann K, Börner T, Kössel H: Editing of the chloroplast rpoB transcript is independent of chloroplast translation and shows different patterns in barley and maize. EMBO J 12: 4291–4296 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Freyer R, Hoch B, Neckermann K, Maier RM, Kössel H: RNA editing in maize chloroplasts is a processing step independent of splicing and cleavage to monocistronic mRNAs. Plant J 4: 621–629 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hirose T, Wakasugi T, Sigiura M, Kössel H: RNA editing of tobacco petB mRNAs occurs both in chloroplasts and non-photosynthetic proplastids. Plant Mol Biol 26: 509–513 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hiratsuka J, Shimada H, Whittier R, Ishibashi T, Sakamoto M, Mori M, Kondo C, Honji Y, Sun C-R, Meng B-Y, Li Y-Q, Kanno A, Nishizawa Y, Hirai A, Shinozaki K, Sugiura M: The complete sequence of the rice (Oryza sativa) chloroplast genome: Intermolecular recombination between distinct tRNA genes accounts for a major plastid DNA inversion during the evolution of the cereals. Mol Gen Genet 217: 185–194 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shinozaki K, Ohme M, Tanaka M, Wakasugi T, Hayashida N, Matsubayashi T, Zaita N, Chunwongse J, Obokata J, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Ohto C, Torazawa K, Meng BY, Sugita M, Deno H, Kamogashira T, Yamada K, Kusuda J, Takaiwa F, Kato A, Tohdoh N, Shimada H, Sugiura M: The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome. Its gene organization and expression, EMBO J 5: 2043–2049 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ohyama K, Fukuzawa H, Kochi T, Shira H, Sano T, Umesono K, Shiki Y, Takeuchi M, Chang Z, Aota S, Inokuchi H, Ozeki H: Chloroplast gene organization deduced from complete sequence of liverwort Marchantia polymorpha chloroplast DNA. Nature 322: 572–574 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freyer, R., López, C., Maier, R.M. et al. Editing of the chloroplast ndhB encoded transcript shows divergence between closely related members of the grass family (Poaceae). Plant Mol Biol 29, 679–684 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041158

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041158

Key words

Navigation