Skip to main content
Log in

Towards a better model of the effect of prostrate vegetation cover on wind erosion

  • Measurement
  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vegetation cover is the key to controlling wind erosion. A brief review of wind erosion/cover models is outlined. Fryrear's (1985) soil cover (wheat stubble) model was evaluated against field wind tunnel results from far south-west N.S.W. Fryrear's equation over estimated the soil loss compared to field wind tunnel results.

Fryrear's model failed to provide meaningful results at low cover levels with the soil loss ratio, SLR>1 for percent soil cover, % SC<6. A single parameter exponential model was fitted to the wind tunnel data which ensured that SLR did not exceed 1 for 100% SC. Even with this improvement, the exponential model has drawbacks.

Results suggest that the SLR is sensitive to wind velocity and that SLR goes to 0 well before % SC=100. A method for approximating the threshold wind velocity required to initiate erosion for various cover levels is described. Using the recurrence interval for a prescribed wind velocity, the probability of erosion hazard for a field can be determined.

It is the authors belief that the wind tunnel is underestimating the occurrence of wind erosion events in this study. Three reasons why the wind tunnel may be underestimating erosion events are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagnold, R. A. 1941. The physics of blown sand and desert dunes, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, G. R. & Leys, J. F. 1989. A farming system for sandy soils in far south-western New South Wales, Symposium proceedings of Soil Management '88, 377–390, Darling Downs Institute of Advanced Education, Toowoomba, Queensland, 19–21 September, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnley, I. H. 1987. Health indicators. In: Atlas of N.S.W.: portrait of a state, CMA Dept. Lands, N.S.W. (Eds) Harriman, R. J. and Clifford, E. S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D. 1986. Wind erosion research techniques workshop. Conducted under the auspices of the Standing Committee of Soil Conservation, Esperance, W. A., February 1985.

  • Carter, D. & Findlater, P. 1989. Erosion potential of phomopsis-resistant lupin stubbles. W.A.J. Agric. 30: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chepil, W. S. 1944. Utilization of crop residue for wind erosion control. Sci. Agric. 24: 307–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chepil, W. S. 1950. Properties of soil that influence wind erosion. I. The governing principle of surface roughness. Soil Sci. 69: 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chepil, W. S. 1957. Width of field strips to control wind erosion. Kansas Ag. Exp. Stn. Tech Bull., 92, United States Department of Agriculture.

  • Chepil, W. S. & Woodruff, N. P. 1963. The physics of wind erosion and its control. Adv. Agron. 15: 211–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryrear, D. W. 1985. Soil cover and wind erosion. Trans. of ASAE 28: 781–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J. M. 1982. Soil cover prediction with various amount and types of crop residue. Trans. of the ASAE 27: 1333–1337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J. M. 1984. Prediction of soil erosion by water and wind for various fractions of cover. Trans. of the ASAE 29: 1345–1350, 1354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys, J. F. 1986. Situation statement on wind erosion in N.S.W., in Wind erosion research techniques workshop. D. Carter (ed), conducted under the auspices of the Standing Comittee of Soil Conservation, Esperance, W. A., February 1985.

  • Leys, J. F. & Semple, W. S. 1984. Estimating the weight of crop residues for wind erosion protection. Western area Tech. Bul. 24, Soil Conservation Service of N.S.W.

  • Lourensz, R. S. & Abe, K. 1983. A dust storm over Melbourne. Weather 38: 272–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, L. & allison, B. E. 1976. Wind erosion: The protective role of simulated standing stubble. Trans. of the ASAE 19: 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, L. & Allison, B. E. 1981. Equivalent wind erosion protection from selected crop residues. Trans. of the ASAE 24: 405–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, L., Schrandt, R. L. & Schneidler, N. F. 1974. How aerodynamic roughness elements control sand movement. Trans. of the ASAE 17: 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTainsh, G. H., Lynch, A. W. & Burgess, R. C. 1990. Wind erosion in eastern Australia. Aust. J. Soil Res. 28: 323–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. K. 1970. Drag measurements in roughness arrays of varying density and distribution. Agr. Meteorol. 8: 269–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. K. 1972. Principles of soil erosion and its prevention. In: The use of trees and shrubs in the dry country of Australia. Deparment of National Development, Forestry and Timber Bureau. Australia Government Printing Service, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcote, K. H. 1979. A Factual Key to the Recognition of Australian Soils. Rellim. Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, O. P., Emery, K. A., Abraham, N. A., Johnston, D., Pattemore, V. J. & Cunningham, G. M. 1989. Land Degradation Survey of New South Wales: 1987–88. Soil Conservation Service of N.S.W.

  • Pye, K. 1987. Aeolian Dust and Dust Deposits. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raupach, M. R. & Leys, J. F. 1990. Aerodynamics of a portable wind erosion tunnel for measuring soil erodibility by wind. Aust. J. Soil Res. 28: 177–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1988, SAS/STATTM User's Guide. Release 6.03 Edition, Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc. 1028 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddoway, F. H., Chepil, W. S. & Armbrust, D.V. 1965. Effect of kind, and placement of residue on wind erosion control. Trans. of ASAE 8: 327–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van deVen, T. A. M., Fryrear, D. W. & Spann, W. P. 1989, Vegetation characteristics and soil loss by wind. J. Soil and Water Cons. 44: 347–349.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leys, J.F. Towards a better model of the effect of prostrate vegetation cover on wind erosion. Vegetatio 91, 49–58 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036047

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036047

Keywords

Navigation