Skip to main content
Log in

Isolation of matrices from maize leaf nuclei: identification of a matrix-binding site adjacent to theAdh1 gene

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nuclear matrices were isolated from maize leaves by the two conventional methods usually employed for the preparation of the corresponding structures of animal origin. It is demonstrated that functionally competent matrices, recognizing and specifically binding the MAR-containing DNA of the mousek-immunoglobulin gene may be prepared by both 2 M NaCl and LIS extractions of maize nuclei.

A DNA region with a high affinity for the nuclear matrix was identified at the 5′ end of the maizeAdh1-S gene, distal to the promoter region. The presence of sites of reported altered chromatin structure in this particular region is discussed. While the proximity and the cohabitation of MARs with different regulatory elements is a common feature of matrix association regions in animal systems, this is the first plant MAR identified in a region of known significance for gene regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cockerill PN, Garrard WT: Chromosomal loop anchorage of thek-immunoglobin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites. Cell 44: 273–282 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mirkovitch J, Mirault ME, Laemmli UK: Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell 39: 223–232 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gasser SM, Laemmli UK: Cohabitation of scaffold binding regions with upstream/enhancer elements of three developmentally regulated genes ofD. melanogaster. Cell 46: 521–530 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mirsky AE, Ris H: The composition and structure of isolated chromosomes. J Gen Physiol 34: 475–492 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mounty KL, Dounce AL: The properties and the enzymatic degradation of deoxyribonucleoprotein from liver cell nuclei. J Gen Physiol 41: 595–608 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berezney R, Coffey D: Identification of a nuclear protein matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 60: 1410–1417 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tsanev R, Avramova Z: Nonprotamine nucleoprotein ultrastructures in mature ram sperm nuclei. Eur J Cell Biol 24: 139–145 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gasser SM: Nuclear scaffold and higher-order folding of eukaryotic DNA. In: Kahl G (ed) Architecture of Eukaryotic Genes, pp. 461–471. VCH Verlagsgeselschaft, Weinheim (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garrard WT: Chromosomal loop organization in eukaryotic genomes. Nucl Acids Mol Biol 4: 163–175 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bonifer C, Hecht A, Saneressig H, Winter D, Sippel AE: Dynamic chromatin: the regulatory domain organization of eukaryotic genome. J Cell Biochem 47: 99–108 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stief A, Winter DM, Stratling WH, Sippel AE: A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity. Nature 341: 34–345 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Phi-Van L, von Kries JP, Ostertag W, Stratling WH: The chicken lysozyme 5′ matrix attachment region increases transcription from a heterologous promoter in heterologous cells and dampens position effects on the expression of transfected genes. Mol Cell Biol 10: 2302–2307 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hall G, Allen GC, Loer DS, Thomson WK, Spiker S: Nuclear scaffolds and scaffold-attachment regions in higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 9320–9324 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Slatter RE, Dupree P, Gray G: A scaffold-associated DNA region is located downstream of the pea plastocianin gene. Plant Cell 3: 1239–1250 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Breyne P, van Montague M, Depicker A, Gheysen G: Characterization of a plant scaffold-attachment region in DNA fragment that normalizes transgene expression in tobacco. Plant Cell 4: 463–471 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steinmuller K, Apel K: A simple and efficient procedure for isolating plant chromatin which is suitable for studies of DNase 1-sensitive domains and hypersensitive sites. Plant Mol Biol 7: 87–94 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dennis ES, Gerlach WL, Pryor AJ, Bennetzen JL, Ingli A, Llewellyn D, Sachs MW, Ferl RJ, Peakock WJ: Molecular analysis of the Alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh1) gene of the maize. Nucl Acids Res 12: 3983–3995 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson JN: Detection, sequence, patterns and function of unusual DNA structures. Nucl Acids Res 14: 8513–8533 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eckdahl TT, Anderson JN: Computer modeling of DNA structures involved in chromosome maintenance. Nucl Acids Res 15: 8531–8545 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stephanova E, Stancheva R, Avramova Z: Binding of sequences from the 5′- and 3′-nontranscribed spacers of the rat rDNA locus to the nucleolar matrix: Chromosoma (1993), in press.

  21. Cook PR: The nucleoskeleton: artefact, passive framework or active site? J Cell Sci 90: 1–6 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cockerill PN, Garrard WT: Chromosomal loop anchorage sites appear to be evolutionarily conserved. FEBS Lett 204: 5–7 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fey EG, Penmann S: Nuclear matrix proteins reflect cell type of origin in cultured human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 121–125 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  24. von Kries JP, Buhrmaster H, Sratling WH: A matrix/scaffold attachment region binding protein: identification, purification and mode of binding. Cell 70: 631–645 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dickinson LA, Joh T, Kohwi Y, Kohwi-Shigematsu T: A tissue specific MAR/SAR DNA-binding protein with unusual binding site recognition. Cell 70: 631–645 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stuurman N, Maijne AML, van der Po A, de Long L, van Drie R, van Renswoude J: The nuclear matrix from cells of different origin. Evidence for a common set of matrix proteins. J Biol Chem 265: 5460–5465 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bennetzen JL, Swanson J, Taylor WC, Freeling M: DNA insertion in the first intron of maizeAdh1 affects message levels; cloning of progenitor and mutantAdh1 alleles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 4125–4128 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kas E, Laemmli UK:In vivo topoisomerase II cleavage ofDrosophila histone and satellite III repeats: DNA sequence and structural characteristics. EMBO J 11: 705–716 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Spitzner JR, Muller MT: A consensus sequence for cleavage by vertebrate DNA topoisomerase II. Nucl Acids Res 16: 5533–5556 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Homberger HP: Bent DNA is a structural feature of scaffold-attachment regions inDrosophila melanogaster interphase nuclei. Chromosoma 98: 99–104 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  31. van Wye JD, Bronson EC, Anderson JN: Species-specific patterns of DNA bending and sequence. Nucl Acids Res 19: 5253–5261 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Von Kries JP, Phi-Van L, Diekmann S, Stratling WH: A non-curved chicken lysozyme 5′-matrix attachment site is 3′-followed by a strongly curved DNA sequence. Nucl Acids Res 18: 3881–3885 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kohwi-Shigematsu T, Kohwi Y: Torsional stress stabilizes extended base unpairing in supressor sites flanking immunoglobin heavy chain enhancer. Biochemistry 29: 9551–9560 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bode J, Kohwi Y, Dickinson L, Joh T, Klehr D, Mielke C, Kohwi-Shigematsu T: Biological significance of unwinding capability of nuclear matrix-associating DNAs. Science 255: 195–197 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ferl RJ, Nick HS, Laughner BH: Architecture of a plant promoter: S1 nuclease hypersensitive features of maizeAdh1. Plant Mol Biol 8: 299–307 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Paul A-L, Vasil V, Vasil I, Ferl RJ: Constitutive and anaerobically induced DNase I-hypersensitive sites in the 5′-region of the maizeAdh1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 799–803 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ferl RJ: Modulation of chromatin structure in the regulation of maizeAdh1 gene. Mol Gen Genet 200: 207–210 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vayda ME, Freeling M: Insertion of theMul transposable element into the first inton of maizeAdh interfers with transcript elongation but does not disrupt chromatin structure. Plant Mol Biol 6: 441–457 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Walker JC, Howard EA, Dennis ES, Peakock WJ: DNA sequences required for anaerobic expression of the maize alcohol dehydrogenase 1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 6624–6628 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Paul A-L, Ferl RJ:In vivo footprinting reveals uniquecis-elements and different modes of hypoxic induction in maizeAdh1 andAdh2. Plant Cell 3: 159–168 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lee L, Fenoll C, Bennetzen JL: Construction and homologous expression of a maizeAdh1 basedNco I cassette vector. Plant Physiol 85: 327–330 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Avramova, Z., Bennetzen, J.L. Isolation of matrices from maize leaf nuclei: identification of a matrix-binding site adjacent to theAdh1 gene. Plant Mol Biol 22, 1135–1143 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028982

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028982

Key words

Navigation