Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptation of the thylakoid membranes of pea chloroplasts to light intensities. II. Regulation of electron transport capacities, electron carriers, coupling factor (CF1) activity and rates of photosynthesis

  • Published:
Photosynthesis Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The electron transport rates of photosystems II and I, amounts of electron carriers, coupling factor activity and photosynthetic rates were investigated in thylakoids isolated from pea plants grown under a wide range of light intensities (16 h light-8 h dark). The electron transport rates of PS II and PS I, as partial reactions or in whole chain, and coupling factor activity on a unit chlorophyll basis, all increased as the light intensity available for growth was altered from a very low intensity of 10 μE m-2s-1 to a high intensity of 840 μE m-2s-1. Similarly, there were increases in the amounts of atrazine binding sites, plastoquinine, cytochrome f and P700 per unit chlorophyll; significantly, the amounts of reaction centres of PS II and PS I were not equal at any light intensity. The rate of change of all parameters with respect to light intensity could be represented by two straight lines of different slopes which met at a transition point corresponding to approximately 200 μE m-2s-1 during growth. These photoadaptations were similar to those observed for both the relative distribution of chlorophyll in chlorophyll-protein complexes and the chl a/chl b ratios [Leong and Anderson, 1984, Photosynthesis Research 5:117–128]. Since these thylakoid components and functions were affected in the same direction by light intensity during growth and all show linear relationships with chl a/chl b ratios, it indicates that they are closely regulated and markedly well co-ordinated. Plants compensate for the limited amount of low light intensities by drastically increasing the light-harvesting antenna unit size of photosystem II and to a lesser extent that of photosystem I. Changes in the composition of the thylakoid membranes exert a regulatory effect on the overall photosynthetic rate up to approximately 450 μE m-2s-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

chl:

chlorophyll

cyt:

cytochrome

PQ:

plastoquinone

PS:

photosystem

References

  1. Åkerlund H-E, Andersson B and Albertsson P-Å (1976) Isolation of photosystem II-enriched membrane vesicles from spinach chloroplasts by phase partition. Biochim Biophys Acta 449: 525–535

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ames BN (1966) Assay of inorganic phosphate, total phosphate and phosphatases. Methods Enzymol 8: 115–118

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson JM (1982) The role of chlorophyll-protein complexes in the function and structure of chloroplast thylakoids. Mol Cell Biochem 46: 161–172

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson JM and Andersson B (1982) The architecture of photosynthetic membranes: lateral and transverse organization. Trends Biochem Sciences 7: 288–292

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barr R and Crane FL (1971) Quinones in algae and higher plants. Methods Enzymol. 23: 372–408

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bendall DS, Davenport HE and Hill R (1971) Cytochrome components in chloroplansts of the higher plants. Methods Enzymol 23: 327–344

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berzborn RJ, Müller D, Ross P and Andersson B (1981) Significance of different quantitative determinations of photosynthetic ATP-synthase CF1 for heterogeneous CFI distribution and grana formation. In Akovunoglou G ed. Photosynthesis III. Structure and molecular organization of the photosynthetic apparatus, pp 107–120. Philadelphia, Pa: Balaban International Science Services

    Google Scholar 

  8. Björkman O (1981) Responses to different quantum flux densities. In Lange OK, Nobel PS, Osmond CB and Ziegler H eds. Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology Vol 12A: Physiological Plant Ecology, pp 57–107. Berlin: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boardman NK (1977) Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 28: 355–377

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boardman NK, Björkman O, Anderson JM, Goodchild DJ and Thorne SW (1974) Photosynthetic adaptation of higher plants to light intensity: Relationship between chloroplast structure, composition of the photosystems and photosynthetic rates. In Avron M ed. Proc 3rd Int Congr on Photosynthesis pp 1809–1827. Amsterdam: Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hurt E and Hauska G (1981) A cytochrome f/b6 complex of five polypeptides with plastoquinol-plastocyanin-oxido-reductase activity from spinach chloroplasts. Eur J Biochem 117: 591–599

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leong T-Y and Anderson JM (1983) Changes in composition and function of thylakoid membranes as a result of photosynthetic adaptation of chloroplasts from pea plants grown under different light conditions. Biochim Biophys Acta 723: 391–399

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leong T-Y and Anderson JM Adaption of the thylakoid membranes of pea chloroplasts to various light intensities. I. Study on the distribution of chlorophyll-protein complexes. In this issue

  14. Leong T-Y and Anderson JM (1983) Effect of temperature during growth on the distribution of chlorophyll-protein complexes, coupling factor CF1 activity and photosynthetic rates in two cultivars of sunflower. Proceedings of VIth Int Photosynthesis Cong: In press

  15. Markwell JP, Thornber JP, Skrdla MP (1980) Effect of detergents on the reliability of a chemical assay for P-700. Biochim Biophys Acta 591: 391–399

    Google Scholar 

  16. Melis A and Brown JS (1980) The stoichiometry of System I and II reaction centres in different photosynthetic membranes. Proc Nat Acad Sci 77: 4712–4716

    Google Scholar 

  17. Melis A and Harvey GW (1981) Regulation of photosystem stoichiometry, chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b content and relation to chloroplast ultrastructure. Biochim Biophys Acta 637: 138–145

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pfister K, Steinback KE, Gardner G and Arntzen CJ (1981) Photoaffinity labelling of an hebicide receptor protein in chloroplast membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 78: 981–985

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pick U and Bassilian S (1981) Octyl glucoside stimulates a Mg++-specific ATPase activity in chloroplast CF1. In Selman BR Selman-Reimer S eds. Energy Coupling in Photosynthesis, pp 251–260. Amsterdam: Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  20. Satoh K, Nakatani HY, Steinback KE, Watson J and Arntzen CJ (1983) Polypeptide composition of a photosystem II core complex. Presence of a herbicide-binding protein. Biochim Biophys Acta 724: 142–150

    Google Scholar 

  21. Senger H and Fleischhacker PH (1978) Adaption of the photosynthetic apparatus of Scenedesmus obliquus to strong and weak light conditions. I. Differences in pigments, photosynthetic capacity, quantum yield and dark reactions. Physiol Plant 43: 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tischer W and Strotmann H (1977) Relationship between inhibitor binding by chloroplasts and inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport. Biochim Biophys Acta 460: 113–125

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wild A (1979) Physiology of photosynthesis in higher plants. The adaptation of photosynthesis to light intensity and light quality in higher plants. Ber Deutsch Bot Ges 92: 341–364

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wong SC, Cowan IR and Farquar GD (1979) Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282: 424–426

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leong, TY., Anderson, J.M. Adaptation of the thylakoid membranes of pea chloroplasts to light intensities. II. Regulation of electron transport capacities, electron carriers, coupling factor (CF1) activity and rates of photosynthesis. Photosynth Res 5, 117–128 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028525

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028525

Key words

Navigation