Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variation and selection criterion for digestibility traits of forage maize

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Variations in feeding value characteristics were studied on a factorial mating design, within a multilocal network. The in vitro digestibility of dry matter (IVDDM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), starch, soluble carbohydrate, protein and ash contents were evaluated on whole plant samples. The in vitro digestibility of the non-starch and non-soluble carbohydrate plant part (IVDNSC) was also computed from near infra-red reflectance spectroscopy estimations of IVDDM, starch and soluble carbohydrate contents. Variations due to general combining ability (GCA) were more important, for all traits, than variations due to specific combining ability (SCA). Variations due to the GCA × environment interaction were also sizeable and were partly explained by the earliness of the lines. IVDDM was primarily influenced by the relative proportions of cell walls and starch in the whole plant, which were particularly susceptible to the development stage of the plants, at harvest. When adjusted for earliness, there was generally no significant relation between the line per se value and GCA performance in the biochemical constituent contents of the plant. On the contrary, IVDNSC seemed to be a feeding value trait worth evaluating at the inbred line level. It was also almost independent of the ripening stage and could be easily computed from whole plant samples. IVDNSC, with a simultaneous control of starch content, might be a good selection criterion for evaluating and improving the nutritive value of forage maize.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrieu, J., C.Demarquilly, P.Dardenne, Y.Barrière, M.Lila, P.Maupetit, F.Rivière & N.Femenias, 1993. Composition and nutritive value of whole maize plants fed fresh to sheep. 1. Factors of variation. Annales de Zootechnie 42: 221–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argillier, O., Y. Barrière, M. Lila, F. Jeanneteau & K. Gélinet, 1995. Genotypic variation for phenolic components of the cell wall in relation to degradability in maize stalks. Submitted.

  • Barrière, Y. & J.C.Emile, 1990. Effet des teneurs en grain et de la variabilité génétique sur la valeur énergétique du mais ensilage mesurée par des vaches laitières. Agronomie 10: 201–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrière, Y., C.Demarquilly, Y.Hébert, P.Dardenne, J.Andrieu, P.Maupetit, M.Lila & J.C.Emile, 1991. Influences de la variabilité génétique et environnementale sur la digestibilité in vitro ou in vivo du maïs fourrage. Agronomie 3: 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrière, Y., R.Traineau, J.C.Emile & Y.Hébert, 1992. Variation and covariation of silage maize digestibility estimated from digestion trials with sheep. Euphytica 59: 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrière, Y., Y.Hébert, B.Julier, E.Young & V.Furstoss, 1993. Genetic variation for silage and NIRS traits in an half-diallel design of 21 inbred lines of maize. Maydica 38: 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrière, Y. & O.Argillier, 1993. Brown-midrib genes of maize, a review. Agronomie 13: 865–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrière, Y., J.C. Emile, R. Traineau & Y. Hébert, 1994. Genetic variation in the feeding efficiency of maize genotypes evaluated from experiments with dairy cows. In press.

  • Cone, J.W. & F.W.Engels, 1990. Influence of growth temperature on anatomy and in vitro digestibility of maize tissues. J. Agric. Sci., Cambridge 114: 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagnelie, P., 1973. Théorie et méthodes statistiques. Les presses agronomiques de Gembloux, ASBL.

  • Dardenne, P., J.Andrieu, Y.Barrière, R.Biston, C.Demarquilly, N.Femenias, M.Lila, P.Maupetit, F.Rivière & T.Ronsin, 1993. Composition and nutritive value of whole maize plants fed fresh to sheep. 2. Prediction of the in vivo organic matter digestibility. Annales de Zootechnie 42: 251–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deinum, B. & J.J.Bakker, 1981. Genetic differences in digestibility of forage maize hybrids. Netherlands J. Agric. Sci. 29: 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deinum, B. & P.C. Struik, 1985. Improving the nutritive value of forage maize. Proceedings of the 13th congress of maize and sorghum section of Eucarpia, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 9–12 September 1985, pp. 77–90.

  • Deinum, B., 1988. Genetic and environmental variation in quality of forage maize in Europe. Netherlands. J. Agric. Sci. 36: 400–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deinum, B. & P.C.Struik, 1989. Genetic variation in digestibility of forage maize (Zea mays L.) and its estimation by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS). An analysis. Euphytica 42: 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, J.B., 1988. Two-way analysis using covariates. Statistics 19: 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon, B.S., C.Paul, E.Zimmer, P.A.Gurrath, D.Klein & W.G.Pollmer, 1990. Variation and covariation in stover digestibility traits in diallel crosses of maize. Crop Sci. 30: 931–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolstra, O. & J.H. Medema, 1990. An effective screening method for improvement of cell-wall digestibility in forage maize. Proceedings of the 15th Eucarpia congres Maize-Sorghum, June 4–8 1990, Baden, Austria, pp. 258–270.

  • Dolstra, O., J.H.Medema & A.W.deJong, 1993. Genetic improvement of cell-wall digestibility in forage maize (Zea mays L.) I Performance of inbred lines and related hybrids. Euphytica 65: 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flachowsky, G., W.Peyker, A.Schneider & K.Henkel, 1993. Fiber analyses and in sacco degradability of plant fractions of two corn varieties harvested at various times. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 43: 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallais, A., M.Pollacksek & L.Huguet, 1976. Possibilités de sélection du maïs en tant que plante fourragère. Ann. Amélior. Plantes 26: 591–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goering, H.K. & P.J.VanSoest, 1970. Forage fiber analysis (aparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). USDA ARS Agric. Handb. 379. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurrath, P.A., B.S.Dhillon, W.G.Pollmer, D.Klein & E.Zimmer, 1991. Utility of inbred line evaluation in hybrid breeding for yield and stover digestibility in forage maize. Maydica 36: 65–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronsin, T., 1990. Use of NIR prediction of digestibility in a breeding program for silage maize. Proceedings of the 15th Eucarpia congress Maize-Sorghum, June 4–8 1990, Baden, Austria, p. 277–288.

  • Struik, P.C., 1983. Physiology of forage maize (Zea mays L.) in relation to its production and quality. Doctoral Thesis, Agricultural University Wageningen, 252 pp.

  • Vattikonda, M.R. & R.B.Hunter, 1983. Comparison of grain yield and whole-plant silage production of recommended corn hybrids. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63: 601–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, D.P., J.G.Coors, K.A.Albrecht, D.J.Undersander & P.R.Carter, 1993. Forage quality of maize genotypes selected for extreme fiber concentrations. Crop Sci. 33: 1353–1359.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Argillier, O., Barrière, Y. & Hébert, Y. Genetic variation and selection criterion for digestibility traits of forage maize. Euphytica 82, 175–184 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027064

Key words

Navigation