Skip to main content
Log in

Selection indices for sugarcane improvement at three stages of selection

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Selection indices at different stages of selection were estimated for a biparental mating population of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). At the seedling stage indices constructed from primary characters are better than selection for yield alone. At the clonal stage the superiority of index selection over direct selection was marginal. In the seedling stage, selection based on index can lead to better selection efficiency in succeeding clonal stages. This was confirmed by a sample study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brim C.A., H.W. Johnson & C.C. Cockerham, 1959. Multiple selection criteria in soyabeans. Agron. J. 51: 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell B.E. & C.R. Weber, 1965. General, average and specific selection indices for yield in F1 and F2 soyabean populations. Crop Sci. 5: 223–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosada V.G., R.E. Tapay & H.H. Miayo, 1980. Selection indices for high yield in sugarcane. Proc. ISSCT 17: 1104–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer D.S., 1981. An introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, New York & London (2nd ed.) pp. 340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin C.Y., 1978. Index selection for genetic improvement of quantitative characters. Theor. Appl. Genet. 52: 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani S.C., 1976. Index selection in brown sarson. Indian J. Genet. 34 (2): 173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller J.D., N.I. James & P.M. Lyrene, 1978. Selection indices in sugarcane. Crop Sci. 18 (3): 369–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll R.H. & C.W. Stuber, 1974. Quantitative genetics-empirical results relevant to plant breeding. Adv. Agron. 26: 273–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patra G.J., 1980. Multiple criteria selection in some hybrid populations in groundnut. Indian J. Genet. 40: 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard A.J., D.E. Byth & R.A. Bray, 1973. Genetic variability and the application of selection indices for yield improvement in two soyabean populations. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 24: 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punia M.S., R.S. Hooda & R.S. Paroda, 1982. Discriminant function analysis for sucrose content in sugarcane. Ind. J. Genet. 42: 293–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw M.E.A., 1982. Aspects of variety improvement. Proc. Inter. Ann. Sugarcane Semin. 3: 106–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds N.W. & D.I.T. Walker, 1986. An economic selection index for sugarcane breeding. Euphytica 35: 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R.P. & S.S. Baghel, 1977. Yield components and their implications to selection in sorghum. Indian J. Genet. 37 (1): 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith H.F., 1936. A discriminant function in plant selection indices. Ann. Eugen. 7: 240–250.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santha, V.P., Ethirajan, A.S. Selection indices for sugarcane improvement at three stages of selection. Euphytica 71, 155–159 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023479

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023479

Key words

Navigation