Abstract
The High Speed Double Torsion test has been used to generate steady rapid crack propagation in tough pipe-grade polyethylenes, at speeds of up to 350 ms-1. Dynamic plane-strain fracture resistance GD data, computed from the measured displacement and crack length using a linear elastic steady-state analysis, were systematically scattered. The computed fracture loads exceeded measured values by up to 50 percent. Two possible reasons for these discrepancies are the neglect of unsteady deformation, and the use of small-strain dynamic elastic modulus data to represent the material. Since the torsional wave speed calculated from this modulus provided a good estimate for the limiting crack speed, this paper pursues the first possibility. High speed photography was used to study the deformation field, which proved to be less steady than assumed. The observations were used to support development of a fully dynamic, linear elastic torsion-beam-on-elastic-foundation model for computing the transient deformation field from boundary data. The foundation stiffness, computed by matching predicted and observed deformations in the crack tip vicinity, was consistent with that estimated from earlier quasi-static tests. As judged by the continuity of the computed energy release rate G dyn (and hence, equivalently, of GD), numerical integration along characteristics is more suitable than a conventional explicit finite difference scheme for solving this one-dimensional problem. The GD solution for intermediate crack lengths is also insensitive to assumed initial conditions, which are therefore chosen to minimise the settling time. The curved double-torsion crack front shape, predicted using an earlier quasi-static criterion, agrees closely with that observed from dynamic arrest lines on the fracture surface, but simply assuming the crack front to be straight and normal to the specimen plane has little effect on computed GD data. The dynamic model, used to compute GD as a function of crack speed for several pipe-grade polyethylenes, reduces but does not eliminate scatter; nevertheless, in provides a more reliable and versatile tool for reconsidering the question of material representation in Part II of the paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.M. Greig, P.S. Leevers and P. Yayla, Engineering Fracture Mechanics (1992) in press.
P. Yayla and P.S. Leevers, Engineering Fracture Mechanics (1992) in press.
P.E. O'Donoghue, S.T. Green, M.F. Kanninen and P.K. Bowles, Computers and Structures 38 (1991) 501–513.
M.L. Chan and J.G. Williams, Polymer Engineering and Science 21 (1981) 1019–1026.
R.W. Truss, R.A. Duckett and I.M. Ward, Journal of Materials Science 19 (1984) 413–422.
P. Yayla, Rapid Crack Propagation in Polyethylene Gas Pipes, PhD thesis, University of London (1991).
R.W. Truss, R.A. Duckett and I.M. Ward, Polymer Engineering and Science 23 (1983) 708–712.
P.G. Harry and G.P. Marshall, Plastic and Rubber International (Journal of the Plastics and Rubber Institute, London) 16 No. 6 (1991) 10–13.
R.M.S. Genussov, Rapid Crack Propagation in Pipe Grade Polyethylenes, PhD thesis, University of London (1989).
M.F. Kanninen, S.J. Hudak, H.R. Couque, R.J. Dexter and P. O'Donoghue, International Journal of Fracture 42 (1990) 239–260.
J.F. Kalthoff, J. Beinert, S. Winkler and W. Klemm, in Crack Arrest Methodology and Applications, ASTM STP 711, G.T. Hahn and M.F. Kanninen (eds.), Philadelphia, PA (1980) 109–127.
J.W. Dally, W.L. Fourney and G.R. Irwin, International Journal of Fracture 27 (1985) 159–168.
K. Takahashi and K. Arakawa, Experimental Mechanics 27 (1987) 195–200.
L.B. Freund and A.J. Rosakis, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 40 (1992) 699–719.
S.P. Timoshenko, and J.N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, McGraw Hill, New York (1951).
P.S. Leevers, Journal of Materials Science 17 (1982) 2469–2480.
P.S. Leevers and J.G. Williams, Journal of Materials Science 20 (1985) 77–84.
P.S. Leevers, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 6 (1986) 45–55.
P.S. Leevers and J.G. Williams, Journal of Materials Science 22 (1985) 1097–1107.
P.S. Leevers, Journal of Materials Science Letters 5 (1986) 191–192.
L.B. Freund, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 25 (1977) 69–79.
C.H. Popelar, in Crack Arrest Methodology and Applications, ASTM STP 711 (1980).
W.F. Ames, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Nelson, London (1969).
M.F. Kanninen, International Journal of Fracture 10 (1974) 415–430.
M.F. Kanninen, C. Popelar and P.C. Gehlen, in Fast Fracture and Crack Arrest, ASTM STP 627, G.T. Hahn and M.F. Kanninen (eds.) Philadelphia, PA (1977) 19–38.
P.C. Gehlen, C. Popelar and M.F. Kanninen, International Journal of Fracture 15 (1979) 281–294.
C.H. Popelar and P.C. Gehlen, International Journal of Fracture 15 (1979) 159–177.
M. Perl, M. Shmuely and D. Peretz, International Journal of Fracture 19 (1982) 17–27.
M. Shmuely and C. Levy, International Journal of Fracture 19 (1982) 221–239.
J.F. Malluck and W.W. King, International Journal of Fracture 13 (1977) 655–665.
H. Stoeckl and F. Auer, International Journal of Fracture 12 (1976) 345–358.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wheel, M.A., Leevers, P.S. High speed double torsion tests on tough polymers. I: Linear elastic steady state and dynamic analysis. Int J Fract 61, 331–348 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012396
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012396