Abstract
Teachers of mathematics in New Zealand are critical to the success of their students. It is important for them to have both a positive disposition towards mathematics‚ and skills and knowledge relating to mathematics and mathematics pedagogy. Yet many primary trained teachers have negative dispositions towards mathematics. Changing these attitudes, along with levels of confidence and understanding, would appear to be crucial. Professional learning is one method for achieving this outcome. Unfortunately, for teachers with low self-efficacy in mathematics, engaging in a professional learning experience relating to mathematics may be considered threatening. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the ways in which using collaboratively developed videos within a flipped professional learning programme might improve these dispositions of primary-trained teachers, along with their skills and understanding in mathematics. This study adopted an action research approach, due to the alignment of this methodology with the desire to utilise volunteer participant teachers as co-researchers and for them to reflect on and change their practice. The study found that the use of videos in a flipped professional learning experience increased the self-efficacy ratings of participants in the focus area of their intervention. Also, that it had the potential for teachers to take greater control of their learning journey, thus encouraging teacher agency. Therefore, it is the contention of the research that using videos in a flipped professional learning programme in mathematics could be beneficial to improving the teacher capacity of primary trained teachers in mathematics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Anderson, J. (2017). A mathematician has created a teaching method that’s proving there’s no such thing as a bad math student. Retrieved from https://qz.com/901125/a-mathematician-has-created-a-method-of-teaching-that-is-proving-there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-bad-math-student/.
Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2007). Effective pedagogy in mathematics/pangarau: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Education.
Attard, C., Ingram, N., Forgasz, H., Leger, G., & Grootenboer, P. (2016). Mathematics education and the affective domain. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 73–96). Singapore: Springer.
Bailey, A. (2015). Flipped learning. Training Journal; London, September, 5–7.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. Retrieved from https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura1993EP.pdf.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press (Reprinted in H. Friedman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998). Retrieved from https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/BanEncy.html.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2015). Flipped learning for math instruction. Arlington: International Society for Technology in Education.
Beswick, K. (2008). Influencing teachers’ beliefs about teaching mathematics for numeracy to students with mathematics learning difficulties. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 9, 3–20. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d93f/32df4c9346257f5ba08efc69d3f2c0a0023b.pdf.
Beswick, K. (2014). What teachers’ want: Identifying mathematics teachers’ professional learning needs. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(1), 83–108. Retrieved from http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=32a6efe8-dfcb-4b30-9131-b25151818bd6%40sessionmgr4007.
Beswick, K., Anderson, J., & Hurst, C. (2016). The education and development of practicing teachers. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 329–352). Singapore: Springer.
Biddulph, F. (1999). The legacy of schooling: Student teachers’ initial mathematical feelings and competence. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 1(1999), 64–71.
Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of research. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Atlanta GA. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/22585.
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer Imprints.
Bobis, J., Higgins, J., Cavanagh, M., & Roche, A. (2012). Professional knowledge of practising teachers of mathematics. In B. Perry, T. Lowrie, & T. Logan (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2008–2011 (pp. 313–341). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/lib/waikato/reader.action?docID=3034720&ppg=3.
Bolstad, R., & Gilbert, J. (2012). Supporting future-oriented learning and teaching: A New Zealand perspective. Wellington: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/109317/994_Future-oriented-07062012.pdf.
Burns, M. (2016). Flipping teacher professional development. Retrieved from http://www.globalpartnership.org/blog/flipping-teacher-professional-development.
Calder, N. S. (2011). Processing mathematics through digital technologies: The primary years. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Calvert, L. (2016). The power of teacher agency. JSD, 37(2), 51–56. Retrieved from https://learningforward.org/docs/default-source/jsd-april-2016/the-power-of-teacher-agency-april16.pdf.
Finney, S., & Schraw, G. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs in college statistics courses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00015-2.
Flanagan, L. (2017). For teachers who dread math, finding a better way. San Francisco: KQED Inc. Retrieved from https://ww2.kqed.org/mindshift/2017/08/06/for-teachers-who-dread-math-finding-a-better-way/?utm_medium=Email&utm_source=ExactTarget&utm_campaign=20170813Mindshift&mc_key=00Qi000001WzNyNEAV.
Gedera, D. S. P., & Zalipour, A. (2018). Use of interactive video for teaching and learning. ASCILITE 2018 Conference Proceedings (pp. 362–367). Deakin University, Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Goodwin, B., & Miller, K. (2013). Evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in. Educational Leadership, 70(6), pp. 78–80. Retrieved from http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=cc929fa6-8135-42b4-922c-f7bb90d081e8%40sessionmgr4008&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=85833636&db=ehh.
Larkin, K., & Jamieson-Proctor, R. (2013). Transactional distance theory (TDT): An approach to enhancing knowledge and reducing anxiety of pre-service teachers studying a mathematics education course online. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 434–441). Melbourne: MERGA.
Lee, J., Lim, C., & Kim, H. (2017). Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Education Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 427–453. Retrieved from https://doi-org.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1.
Lo, C., & Hew, K. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2.
Milman, N. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used? Distance Learning, 11(4), 9–11. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.nz/books?hl=en&lr=&id=NgYoDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA9&ots=M5An8D8mQc&sig=A-xhaetZlm9K88NXxXiPpkieFUk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
Pajares, F., & Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(4), 426–443.
Paterson, J. (2009). Fostering ongoing growth and development as a professional. In R. Averill & R. Harvey (Eds.), Teaching secondary school mathematics and statistics: Evidence-based practice (Vol. 2, pp. 189–201). Wellington: NZCER Press.
Patterson, R. (2015). Un(ac)countable : Why millions on maths returned little. Wellington: The New Zealand Initiative Ltd. Retrieved from http://ndhadeliver.natlib.govt.nz/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE25242159.
Schwartz, K. (2017). Can micro-credentials create more meaningful professional development for teachers? Retrieved from https://ww2.kqed.org/mindshift/2017/02/15/can-micro-credentials-create-meaningful-professional-development-for-teachers/.
Shaffer, L. (2017). Why ‘unlearning’ old habits is an essential step for innovation. Retrieved from https://ww2.kqed.org/mindshift/2017/06/23/why-unlearning-old-habits-is-an-essential-step-for-innovation/?utm_medium=Email&utm_source=ExactTarget&utm_campaign=20170625Mindshift&mc_key=00Qi000001WzNyNEAV.
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/48727127.pdf.
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 89–101.
Vale, C., Atweh, B., Averill, R., & Skourdoumbis, A. (2016). Equity, social justice and ethics in mathematics education. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 97–118). Singapore: Springer.
Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 702–739. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40469054.
Young-Loveridge, J., Bicknell, B., & Mills, J. (2012). The mathematical content knowledge and attitudes of New Zealand pre-service primary teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14(2), 28–49.
Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313–340.
Zhang, Q., & Stephens, M. (2013). Utilising a construct of teacher capacity to examine national curriculum reform in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0072-9.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stensness, A., Calder, N. (2021). Flipping Professional Learning Through Videos in Mathematics Education. In: Gedera, D.S.P., Zalipour, A. (eds) Video Pedagogy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4009-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4009-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4008-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4009-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)