Abstract
This study aims to determine the bioremediation potential of bioengineered Shewanella oneidensis as a cost-effective alternative for arsenic (As) removal from groundwater, as opposed to the current complex and hazardous chemical and physical methods. Herein we present a novel filtration method, by bioengineering a bacterium with bioremediation potential, S. oneidensis MR-1, to express As-binding protein, ArsR, as it adopts a biofilm lifestyle. The recombinant S. oneidensis (M) was compared to its wild-type MR-1 (WT) across a range of As concentrations (0–800 µM) and time (0–48 h) in its planktonic and biofilm form. Analyses of As-sorption in the wild-type MR-1 and recombinant indicated significant sequestration which increased with time incubated, while As-sorption did not plateau even at high As concentrations of 800 μM. The recombinant displayed significantly higher As sequestration than the wild type (p < 0.0001; cohen’s d = 122.4), with higher sequestration observed in the planktonic compared to the biofilm form (p < 0.0001; cohen’s d = 4.262). Filtration efficiencies of 87% and 94% were obtained for As(III) and As(V) respectively using our system, showing a significant improvement over current commercial systems. With applications in potable water and industrial wastewater filtration, especially for rural and underdeveloped countries given the lack of reliance on specialized equipment, this system represents a powerful potential next-generation Arsenic filtration method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferguson, J. F., & Gavis, J. (1972). A review of the arsenic cycle in natural waters. Water research, 6(11), 1259-1274.
Mukherjee, A., Sengupta, M. K., Hossain, M. A., Ahamed, S., Das, B., Nayak, B., ... & Chakraborti, D. (2006). Arsenic contamination in groundwater: a global perspective with emphasis on the Asian scenario. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 142–163.
Hong, Y. S., Song, K. H., & Chung, J. Y. (2014). Health effects of chronic arsenic exposure. Journal of preventive medicine and public health, 47(5), 245.
Choong, T. S., Chuah, T., Robiah, Y., Koay, F. G., & Azni, I. (2007). Arsenic toxicity, health hazards and removal techniques from water: An overview. Desalination, 217(1-3), 139-166.
Ning, R. Y. (2002). Arsenic removal by reverse osmosis. Desalination, 143(3), 237-241.
Tourney, J., & Ngwenya, B. T. (2014). The role of bacterial extracellular polymeric substances in geomicrobiology. Chemical Geology, 386, 115-132.
Gadd, G. M. (2010). Metals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and bioremediation. Microbiology, 156(3), 609-643.
Gadd, G. M. (1993). Microbial formation and transformation of organometallic and organometalloid compounds. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 11(4), 297-316.
Zouboulis, A. I., & Katsoyiannis, I. A. (2005). Recent advances in the bioremediation of arsenic-contaminated groundwaters. Environment international, 31(2), 213-219.
Laspidou, C. S., & Rittmann, B. E. (2002). A unified theory for extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water research, 36(11), 2711-2720.
Flemming, H. C., & Wingender, J. (2010). The biofilm matrix. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 8(9), 623.
Myers, J and Myers, C. 2001. “Role for Outer Membrane Cytochromes OmcA and OmcB of Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1 in Reduction of Manganese Dioxide.” Appl and Env Microbiology. 67(1):260-69
Zhou, G., Yuan, J., & Gao, H. (2015). Regulation of biofilm formation by BpfA, BpfD, and BpfG in Shewanella oneidensis. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00790
Saltikov, C. W., Cifuentes, A., Venkateswaran, K., & Newman, D. K. (2003, May). The ars detoxification system is advantageous but not required for As(V) respiration by the genetically tractable Shewanella species strain ANA-3. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12732551
Carvalho, L., De Koe, T., & Tavares, P. (1998). An improved molybdenum blue method for simultaneous determination of inorganic phosphate and arsenate. Restoration, 1(1).
World Health Organization. (2018). Arsenic. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/arsenic#:~:text=The%20current%20recommended%20limit%20of,removing%20arsenic%20from%20drinking%2Dwater.
Harper, T. R., & Kingham, N. W. (1992). Removal of arsenic from wastewater using chemical precipitation methods. Water Environment Research, 64(3), 200-203.
Ramírez-Solís, A., Mukopadhyay, R., Rosen, B. P., & Stemmler, T. L. (2004). Experimental and Theoretical Characterization of Arsenite in Water: Insights into the Coordination Environment of As−O. Inorganic Chemistry, 43(9), 2954-2959. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ic0351592
Harimawan, A., & Ting, Y. P. (2016). Investigation of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties of P. aeruginosa and B. subtilis and their role in bacterial adhesion. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 146, 459-467.
Teitzel, G. M., & Parsek, M. R. (2003). Heavy metal resistance of biofilm and planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Applied and environmental microbiology, 69(4), 2313-2320.
George, C. M., Smith, A. H., Kalman, D. A., & Steinmaus, C. M. (2006). Reverse osmosis filter use and high arsenic levels in private well water. Archives of environmental & occupational health, 61(4), 171-175.
Duarte, A. A., Cardoso, S. J., & Alçada, A. J. (2009). Emerging and innovative techniques for arsenic removal applied to a small water supply system. Sustainability, 1(4), 1288-1304.
Lara, F., Cornejo, L., Yáñez, J., Freer, J., & Mansilla, H. D. (2006). Solar-light assisted removal of arsenic from natural waters: effect of iron and citrate concentrations. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 81(7), 1282–1287.doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1547
Vaaramaa, K., & Lehto, J. (2003). Removal of metals and anions from drinking water by ion exchange. Desalination, 155(2), 157-170.
Rahman, M. H., Rahman, M. M., Watanabe, C., & Yamamoto, K. (2003). Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh and its remedial measures. In Arsenic Contamination in Groundwater-Technical and Policy Dimensions. Proceedings of the UNU-NIES International Workshop, United Nations University, Tokyo, Japan (pp. 9–21).
Walker, M., Seiler, R. L., & Meinert, M. (2008). Effectiveness of household reverse-osmosis systems in a Western US region with high arsenic in groundwater. Science of the Total Environment, 389(2-3), 245-252.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Ms Norazean Zaiden (Singapore Centre of Envionmental Life Science Engineering) and Ms Lim Suat Fong Valerie (NUS High School of Mathematics and Science) for their guidance and mentorship.
This work was supported by NUS High School of Mathematics and Science, the Science Mentorship Programme, and the Ministry of Education, Singapore.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Synthetic Groundwater (SGW) Recipe
SGW was prepared with the following chemicals (and their concentrations): CaCl2 (2.500 mM), MgSO4 (1.246 mM), NH4Cl (0.168 mM), KNO3 (replaced with NaNO3 in this study) (0.059 mM), H3PO4 (0.032 mM), SrCl2.6H2O (0.008 mM), NH46Mo7O24.4 H2O (0.016 mM),, MnCl2.4H2O (0.091 mM), NaHCO3 (7.799 mM), FeSO4.7 H2O (0.010 mM). Arsenic was then added. (Refer to Appendix 4).
Appendix 2: Standard Curves of As(III) and As(V) Methodology
Molybdenum blue As-colorimetric assay [15] was carried out on samples of known concentrations of As(III) and As(V), to obtain a standard curve that is able to convert absorbance read by the spectrophotometer (at 880 nm) to the concentration of As(III) or As(V) in the solution.
Appendix 3: Preparation of Wild-Type and Recombinant S. oneidensis MR-1 Methodology
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedures were performed to fuse the arsR of wild-type (WT) MR-1 to the 5′-end of bpfA, before ligated to pUC57 vector to incorporate a kanamycin resistance gene and aggC, which is a gene downstream to the chromosomal bpfA. With these complementary sequences of chromosomal bpfA and aggC, the linearised fused gene product was transformed into MR-1 by electroporation procedure for homologous recombination to its chromosomal DNA. The starting culture was prepared in Luria–Bertani medium (LB) for 16 h at 30 °C, shaken at 200 rpm. Addition of antibiotic (kanamycin) is used for selection of M. The WT MR-1 was prepared without kanamycin addition.
Appendix 4: Preparation of As in Synthetic Groundwater Methodology
Arsenic stock solutions of As(III) and As(V) were prepared in distilled water using Sodium (meta) arsenite (Sigma Aldrich, S7400) and Sodium arsenate dibasic heptahydrate (Sigma Aldrich, S6756). The As(III) and As(V) concentrations in synthetic groundwater (SGW, refer to Supporting Document 1 [15]) were varied by serial diluting the stock solutions. The pH of SGW was manually adjusted using a pH meter by adding acid (HCl) or base (KOH).
Appendix 5: Calculation of As-Sorption Using the Molybdenum Blue As-Colorimetric Assay Method Methodology
As-colorimetric assay [14] was used to determine the amount of As(III) and As(V) remaining in the solution by reading using a spectrophotometer (at 880 nm). By using standard curves (Appendix 2), the absorbance was converted to the corresponding concentrations of As(III) and As(V) remaining in the solution, determining As sorped by WT and M. The steps for the colorimetric assay are as follows:
-
1.
Use a micropipette to transfer 600 μL of reaction mixture to 3 sets of Eppendorf tubes; set T, set X and set R.
-
2.
Add 18 μL of KMnO4 solution to set X and 18 μL of 5% l-cysteine solution to set R, and mix the tubes using a vortex machine.
-
3.
Heat set R at 80 °C for 1 h.
-
4.
To all sets, add 30 μL of ascorbic acid, then 90 μL of acetone, and finally 120 μL of mixed reagent, mixing with a vortex machine after each addition. 100 mL of mixed reagent contains 5 mL antimony potassium tartrate, 50 mL 20% sulfuric acid, 15 mL ammonium molybdate and 30 mL of distilled water.
-
5.
Use a micropipette to add 3 × 200 μL of the mixture to a 96-well plate, creating 3 technical replicates, and read the plate using a spectrophotometer at OD880.
Appendix 6: Preparation of WT and M Biofilms Methodology
Biofilms of MR-1 wild-type (WT) and bpfA-arsR recombinant (M) were allowed to form within a 15 cm silicone tubing of 0.3 mm inner diameter connected to a continuous supply of Minimal Medium 1 (MM1) pH 7.4 supplemented with 10 mM sodium lactate as carbon source. A starting inoculation volume of 1 ml from a 16 h culture at biomass of OD 1.0 prepared in Luria–Bertani medium (LB) at 30 °C, 200 rpm, were used. Attachment of the inoculated volumes were allowed for 2 h before initiating the pump flow of 3 ml/h. The biofilms were accumulated in the tubing for 1 week before harvested with 3 ml SGW pH 8.5 for downstream experiments.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yam, H.M., Leong, S.K.W., Qiu, X., Zaiden, N. (2021). Bioremediation of Arsenic-Contaminated Water Through Application of Bioengineered Shewanella oneidensis. In: Guo, H., Ren, H., Kim, N. (eds) IRC-SET 2020. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9472-4_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9472-4_49
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9471-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-9472-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)