Abstract
Action-based learning plays an important role in today’s education, with assessment being an inevitable aspect that presently requires extensive financial and human expert resources. A major research area is dedicated to the development and implementation of systems to perform an automated or at least support formative assessment of human actions in action-based learning. That is, recognising and comparing the performed actions of the learner with the previously recorded actions undertaken by experts. Human actions are classified according to the developed taxonomy of human actions to facilitate a formative feedback for the learner. The action-based learning assessment method analyses the action sequences of the learners according to reference solutions (generated by experts) and automatically provides formative feedback to improve learner performance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmed, A., Maqsood, M., Saif, H., & Salman, A. (2012). Affordable interactive virtual reality system for the Dynamic Hip Screw surgery training in vitro. In Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Computer Graphics and Imaging, CGIM 2012 (pp. 248–253). Crete, Greece: Acta Press.
Al-Smadi, M., Gütl, C., & Kannan, R. (2010). Modular assessment system for modern learning settings: Mass. International Journal of Computer Applications, 1(9), 37–43.
Barab, S. A., Squire, K. D., & Dueber, W. (2000). A co-evolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 37–62.
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Berlin: Springer.
Bastiaens, T., Wood, L. C., & Reiners, T. (2014). New landscapes and new eyes: the role of virtual world design for supply chain education. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 6(1), 37–49.
Bresciani, M. J., Morsi, K., Tucker, M., Siprut, M., Stewart, K., & Duncan, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an assessment plan for a virtual engineering lab. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 4(2), 277–285.
Chen, X., Lin, Y., Wang, C., Shen, G., & Wang, X. (2012). A virtual training system using a force feedback haptic device for oral implantology. In Z. Pan, A. Cheok, W. Müller, M. Chang, & M. Zhang (Eds.), Transactions on Edutainment VIII (Vols. 1–7220, pp. 232–240). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Chodos, D., Stroulia, E., King, S., & Carbonaro, M. (2014). A framework for monitoring instructional environments in a virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 24–35.
Craighead, J. (2008). Distributed, game-based, intelligent tutoring systems: The next step in computer based training? In International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems (pp. 247–256). Irvine, CA: IEEE.
Dede, C., & Lewis, M. (1995). Assessment of emerging educational technologies that might assist and enhance school-to-work transitions. Washington, DC, USA: Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress.
Dede, C., Salzman, M., Loftin, R. B., & Sprague, D. (1999). Multisensory immersion as a modelling environment for learning complex scientific concepts. In W. Feurzeig & N. Roberts (Eds.), Modelling and simulation in science and mathematics education (pp. 282–319). New York: Springer.
Doering, A. (2006). Adventure learning: Transformative hybrid online education. Distance Education, 27(2), 197–215.
Dunwell, I., de Freitas, S., Jarvis, S., & de Freitas, S. (2011). Four-dimensional consideration of feedback in serious games. In S. de Freitas & P. Maharg (Eds.), Digital games and learning (pp. 42–62). London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Fardinpour, A., & Dreher, H. (2012). Towards developing Automated Assessment in Virtual Learning Environments. In P. Kommers, T. Issa & P. Isaías (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference Internet Technologies and Society 2012 (pp. 211–216). Perth, Australia: IADIS Press.
Fardinpour, A., & Reiners, T. (2014). The taxonomy of goal-oriented actions in virtual training environments. Procedia Technology, 1, 38–46. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2014.02.007.
Fardinpour, A., Reiners, T., & Dreher, H. (2013). Action-based learning assessment: Evaluating goal-oriented actions in virtual training environments. In H. Carter, M. Gosper and J. Hedberg (Eds.), Electric Dreams. Proceedings Ascilite 2013 Sydney. (pp. 267–277). Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University and ascilite. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/sydney13/program/papers/Fardinpour.pdf.
Filigenzi, M. T., Orr, T. J., & Ruff, T. M. (2000). Virtual reality for mine safety training. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 15(6), 465–469. doi:10.1080/104732200301232.
Fleishman, E. A. (1975). Toward a taxonomy of human performance. American Psychologist, 30(12), 1127–1149. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.30.12.1127.
Goldman, A. I. (1970). A theory of human action. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gregory, S., Dalgarno, B., Campbell, M., Reiners, T., Knox, V., & Masters, M. (2011). Changing directions through VirtualPREX: Engaging pre-service teachers in virtual professional experience. In G. Williams, N. Brown, B. Pittard, & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing demands, changing directions. Proceedings Ascilite Hobart 2011 (pp. 491–501). Hobart, Australia: University of Tasmania and ascilite. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/hobart11/downloads/VPREXAscilitePresentationpptx.pdf.
Gunn, C. (2006). Collaborative virtual sculpting with haptic feedback. Virtual Reality, 10(2), 73–83. doi:10.1007/s10055-006-0044-4.
Herrington, A., & Herrington, J. (2006). Authentic learning environments in higher education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 59–71.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2010). A guide to authentic e-learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hewitt, A. M., Spencer, S. S., Mirliss, D., & Twal, R. (2010). Incident and disaster management training: Collaborative learning opportunities using virtual world scenarios. In E. Asimakopoulou & N. Bessis (Eds.), Advanced ICTs for disaster management and threat detection: Collaborative and distributed frameworks (pp. 179–200). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Hockenmeyer, C., Nussbaumer, A., Lövquist, E., Aboulafia, A., Breen, D., Shorten, G., & Albert, D. (2009). Applying a web and simulation-based system for adaptive competence assessment of spinal anaesthesia. In M. Spaniol, Q. Li, R. Klamma, & R. H. Lau (Eds.), Advances in Web Based Learning: ICWL 2009 (Vol. 5686, pp. 182–191). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03426-8_23
Janesick, V. J. (2006). Authentic assessment primer. New York, NY, USA: Peter Lang.
Kizil, M. (2003). Virtual reality applications in the Australian minerals industry. In F. A. Camisani-Calzolari (Ed.), Application of computers and operations research in the minerals industries (pp. 569–574). Cape Town, South Africa: The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
Lasky, B., & Tempone, I. (2004). Practising what we teach: Vocational teachers learn to research through applying action learning techniques. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(1), 79–94.
Masters, Y., Gregory, S., Reiners, T., Knox, V., & Dalgarno, B. (2013). VirtualPREX: Developing teaching skills in second life. In C. DeCoursey & S. Garrett (Eds.), Studies in virtual world learning and practice (pp. 69–94). Oxford, UK: Inter-Disciplinary Press.
Meyer, C. A. (1992). What’s the difference between “Authentic” and “Performance” assessment? Educational Leadership, 49(8), 39–40.
Naidu, S. (2007). Instructional designs for distance education. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 247–258). Mahwah, NJ, USA: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Naidu, S. (2010). Using scenario-based learning to promote situated learning and develop professional knowledge. In E. P. Errington (Ed.), Preparing graduates for the professions using scenario-based learning (pp. 39–49). Brisbane, Australia: Post Pressed.
Naidu, S., & Bedgood, D., Jr. (2012). Action-based learning. In N. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 75–77). Boston, MA, USA: Springer, US.
Reiners, T., & Wood, L. C. (2013). Immersive virtual environments to facilitate authentic education in Logistics and supply chain management. In Y. Kats (Ed.), Learning management systems and instructional design: Metrics, standards, and applications (pp. 323–343). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Reiners, T., Wood, L. C., & Dron, J. (2014). From chaos towards sense: A learner-centric narrative virtual learning space. In J. Bishop (Ed.), Gamification for human factors integration: Social, educational, and psychological issues (pp. 242–258). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Reiners, T., Wood, L.C., Gregory, S., Petter, N., Teräs, H., Gütl, C., Chang, V., Herrington, J. (2013). nDiVE: The story of how Logistics and Supply Chain Management should be taught. In M. Gosper, J. Hedberg, & H. Carter (Eds.), Electric Dreams. Proceedings ascilite 2013 Sydney (pp. 734–744).
Rickel, J., Johnson, W. L., Way, A., & Rey, M. (1998). STEVE: A pedagogical agent for virtual reality. The second international conference on autonomous agents (pp. 332–333). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Robertson, T. (1997). Cooperative work and lived cognition: a taxonomy of embodied actions. In Proceedings of European Conferences on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Vol. 97, pp. 205–220). Lancaster, UK: Springer Netherlands.
Robertson, T. (2000). Building bridges: negotiating the gap between work practice and technology design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(1), 121–146. doi:10.1006/ijhc.2000.0373.
Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: its current practice, implications, and theory. Oxford, UK: Houghton Mifflin.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
Schank, R. (1997). Virtual learning: A revolutionary approach to building a highly skilled workforce. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39–83). Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
Shen, R., Tang, Y., & Zhang, T. (2001). The intelligent assessment system in web-based distance learning education. In 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, (Vol. 1, p. TIF 7–11). Reno, NV, USA: IEEE.
Shute, V. J. (2011). Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 503–524). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
Shute, V. J., & Glaser, R. (1990). Large-scale evaluation of an intelligent tutoring system: Smithtown. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 51–76.
Shute, V. J., Ventura, M., Bauer, M. I., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2009). Melding the power of serious games and embedded assessment to monitor and foster learning: Flow and grow. In U. Ritterfeld, Cody, & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Serious games: Mechanisms and effects (pp. 295–321). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
Smith, P. E. (1987). Simulating the classroom with media and computers past efforts. Future Possibilities. Simulation & Gaming, 18(3), 395–413.
Thompson, C. W. F., & Hagstrom, F. (2011). Modeling healthcare: Logistics in a virtual world. IEEE Internet Computing, 12(4), 100–104.
Twinning, P. (2009). Exploring the educational potential of virtual worlds: Some reflections from the SPP. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 496–514.
Verhulsdonck, G., & Morie, J. (2009). Virtual Chironomia: Developing Standards for Non-verbal Communication in Virtual Worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2(3). Retrieved from http://jvwr-ojs-utexas.tdl.org/jvwr/index.php/jvwr/article/view/657
Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment (pp. 1–6). Washington, DC, USA: ERIC Digest.
Wilson, B. G. (Ed.). (1996). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Educational Technology Publications.
Wood, L. C., & Reiners, T. (2013). Game-based elements to upgrade bots to non-player characters in support of educators. In A. Hebbel-Seeger, T. Reiners, & D. Schäfer (Eds.), Synthetic worlds: Emerging technologies in education and economics (pp. 257–277). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Wriedt, S., Reiners, T., & Ebeling, M. (2008). How to teach and demonstrate topics of supply chain management in virtual worlds. In J. Luca & E. R. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Vienna, Austria (pp. 5501–5508). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Acknowledgements
The Australian Government Office has provided support for the production of this publication for Learning and Teaching (Grant: Development of an authentic training environment to support skill acquisition in logistics and supply chain management, ID: ID12-2498). The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fardinpour, A., Reiners, T., Wood, L.C. (2018). Action-Based Learning Assessment in Virtual Training Environments. In: Gregory, S., Wood, D. (eds) Authentic Virtual World Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6382-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6382-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6381-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6382-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)