Skip to main content

Mapping Power

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mapping Across Academia

Abstract

In opposition to the classical assumption that would see maps as neutral and objective products, deconstructionist critique has long explained their ideological and instrumental nature. This decisive intellectual reorientation of the conception of the map has clearly shown that maps conceal within a power of persuasion and that they have served discourses of power. But the deepening of the relationship between maps, authority and scholars via this approach has granted prominence to the first two elements, leaving the third in a distinctly subordinate position. Reassessing the figure of scholars and their cartographic practices, this chapter addresses the issue from a still largely unexplored angle, looking into graphical solutions chosen to depict power, in the belief that these solutions have helped to shape the interpretation of the spatiality of power , and influence the very exercising of it. Thus reversing the perspective, and that is investigating the maps of power rather than the power of maps, or the power over maps, it is reconstructed here by means of many empirical examples: those scholars and cartographic genres that have told the history of the spatial representation of power. In this way it also intends to favour an approach to the history of cartography that can organically place it within the more general framework of the history of visual culture and visual arts .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Normally referred to as the ‘multiple static map’ in English (Monmonier 1990: 30–45), this method dates back to the beginning of the twentieth century and was probably inspired by motion pictures, an innovation at that time. Numerous important studies in the field of graphic display have devoted attention to this method (Bertin 1967: 354–355; Tufte 1983: 34–36, 170–175) since its full introduction into information science (Neurath 1939).

  2. 2.

    For a historical account of the political content and graphic characteristics of geopolitical cartography see Herb (1997) and Boria (2008).

  3. 3.

    Inspired by the ‘threshold principle’—the need for a sufficiently large territory postulated by the liberal interpretation of the concept of nation—Giuseppe Mazzini’s 1857 map of Europe replaced nation states with a dozen large states or Multinational Federations, plus Italy (Hobsbawm 1990: 30–31).

  4. 4.

    The map opening his most famous book, Pan-Europa (1923), laying the foundations of his movement for the unification of Europe, shows a united continent, from which only Great Britain is excluded.

  5. 5.

    In The Breakdown of Nations (1957) by Leopold Kohr, a pacifist anarchist, a map is included in the appendix, where Europe is divided into many equally small states. This, he believed, was the only solution able to guarantee a more stable and reconciled world.

References

  • Aldenderfer, M. (1996). Introduction. In M. Aldenderfer & H. D. G. Maschner (Eds.), Anthropology, space, geographic information systems (pp. 3–18). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. A., & Coleman, J. S. (1960). The politics of developing areas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. R. H. (2003). Geography and history. Bridging the divide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T. P. M. (2004). The Pentagon’s new map. War and peace in the twenty-first century. New York: Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, J. (1967). Semiologie graphique. Paris—Le Haye: Mouton Gauthier Villars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besse, J. M. (2008). Cartographie et pensée visuelle. Réflexions sur la schématisation graphique. In I. Laboulais (Ed.), Les usages des cartes (pp. 19–32). Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, L., & Mogel, L. (Eds.). (2008). An atlas of radical cartography. Los Angeles: Journal of Aesthetics and Protest Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. (1997). Maps and history. Constructing images of the past. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boria, E. (2008). Geopolitical maps: A sketch history of a neglected trend in cartography. Geopolitics, 13(2), 278–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boria, E. (2012). Mapping time, In EspaceTemps.net, 23.01.2012. http://www.espacestemps.net/articles/mapping-time, Original version (2010). Cartografare il tempo. In E. Casti & J. Lévy (Eds.), Le sfide cartografiche (pp. 95–115). Il Lavoro Editoriale: Ancona.

  • Boria, E. (2015). Representing the politics of borders: Unorthodox maps in reclus, mackinder and others. Geopolitics, 20(1), 142–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, I. (1928). The new world. Problems in political geography (4th ed.). NY and Chicago: World Book Company, Yonkers on Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabant, J. M. (1977). Des résponses aux questions de Michel Foucault. Hèrodote 6: 12–14. (English translation: “Response: Jean-Michel Brabant.”) In J. W. Crampton, & S. Elden (Eds.), 2007. Space, knowledge and power. Foucault and geography (pp. 25–28). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, F., & Hillen Ziegfeld, A. (1930). Geopolitischer Geschichtsatlas. Dresden: Ehlermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunn, S. D., Cutter, S. L., & Harrington, J. W. (Eds.). (2004). Geography and technology. Dordrecth: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzezinski, Z. (1997). The grand chessboard: American primacy and its geostrategic imperatives. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buisseret, D. (Ed.). (1992). Monarchs, ministers and maps. The emergence of cartography as a tool of government in early modern Europe. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, W. (1988). The nuclear war atlas. New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture. The rise of the network society (Vol. I). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casti, E. (1998). L’ordine del mondo e la sua rappresentazione. Semiosi cartografica e autoreferenza. Milano: Unicopli. (English translation: Reality as representation: The semiotics of cartography and the generation of meaning. Bergamo: Bergamo University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaliand, G., & Rageau, J. P. (1983). Atlas stratégique. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaliand, G., & Rageau, J. P. (1984). Atlas de la decouverte du monde. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaliand, G., & Rageau, J. P. (1988). Atlas politique du XXe siècle. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaliand, G., & Rageau, J. P. (1989). Atlas des Européens. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaliand, G., & Rageau, J. P. (1991). Atlas des diasporas. Paris: Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaliand, G., & Rageau, J. P. (1993). Atlas des empires. Paris: Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2004). Hegemony or survival. America’s quest for global dominance. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobarrubias, S., & Pickles, J. (2009). Spacing movements. The turn to cartographies and mapping practices in contemporary social movements. In B. Warf, & S. Arias (Eds.), The spatial turn. Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 36–58). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. B. (1964). Geography and politics in a divided world. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. P. (1959). Geography of world affairs. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D., & Della Dora, V. (2005). Mapping global war: Los Angeles, the Pacific, and Charles Owens’s pictorial cartography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(2), 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coudenhove-Kalergi, R. (1923). Pan-Europa. Vienna: Pan-Europa Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K. R. (1969). The voting decision in a spatial context. In C. Board, R. J. Chorley, & P. Haggett (Eds.), Progress in geography (pp. 81–117). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, J. W. (1994). Cartography’s defining moment: The Peters projection controversy, 1974–1990. Cartographica, 31, 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, J. W. (2003). The political mapping of cyberspace. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, J. W. (2004). GIS and geographic governance. Reconstructing the choropleth map. Cartographica, 39(1), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, J. W. (2009). Cartography: Performative, participatory, political. Progress in Human Geography, 33(6), 840–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, M., Kitchin, R., & Perkins, C. (Eds.). (2009). Rethinking maps. New frontiers in cartographic theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorling, D., Newman, N., & Barford, A. (2008). The atlas of the real world. Mapping the way we live. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edney, M. H. (1993). Cartography without ‘progress’: Reinterpreting the nature and historical development of mapmaking. Cartographica, 30(2 & 3), 54–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edney, M. H. (1997). Mapping an empire. The geographical construction of British India (pp. 1765–1843). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evrigenis, I. D. (2008). Fear of enemies and collective actions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, P. (Ed.). (1999). State formation, nation-building, and mass politics in Europe: The theory of Stein Rokkan based on his collected works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1981). As malhas do poder, Barbàrie 4: 23–27 and 5: 34–42 (English translation: J. W. Crampton, & S. Elden (Eds.), 2007. “The meshes of power.” Space, knowledge and power. foucault and geography) (pp. 153–162). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2004). Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France, 1978–1979. Paris: Gallimard-Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francaviglia, R. V. (1995). The shape of Texas: Maps as metaphors. College Station, TX: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friendly, M., & Denis, D. J. (2001). Milestones in the history of thematic cartography, statistical graphics, and data visualization. http://www.datavis.ca/milestones/. Accessed November 2, 2011.

  • Garrigou, A. (1990). Invention et usages de la carte électorale. Politix, 3(10–11), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godlewska, A., & Smith, N. (Eds.). (1994). Geography and empire. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann, J. (1952). La Politique des États et leur Géographie. Paris: Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, J. B. (1988a). Silences and secrecy: The hidden agenda of cartography in early modern Europe. Imago Mundi, 40, 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, J. B. (1988b). Maps, knowledge and power. In D. Cosgrove & S. Daniels (Eds.), The iconography of landscape (pp. 277–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, J. B. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica, 26(2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, J. B. (2001). The new nature of maps. Essays in the history of cartography. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. E. (1944). Look at the world. The fortune atlas for world strategy. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. E., & Strausz-Hupé, R. (1945). Maps, strategy and world politics. In H. Sprout & M. Sprout (Eds.), Foundations of national power (pp. 90–93). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. E., & Weigert, H. W. (1944). World view and strategy. In H. W. Weigert & V. Stefansson (Eds.), Compass of the world: A symposium on political geography (pp. 74–88). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haushofer, K. (1931). Geopolitik der Pan-Ideen. Berlin: Zentral Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haushofer, K. (1934). Weltpolitik von Heute. Berlin: Zeitgeschichte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrikson, A. K. (1980). The geographical ‘mental maps’ of American foreign policy makers. International Political Science Review, 1(4), 495–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herb, G. H. (1997). Under the map of Germany. Nationalism and propaganda 1918–1945. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herb, G. H., Häkli, J., Corson, M. W., Mellow, N., Cobarrubias, S., & Casas-Cortes, M. (Eds.). (2009). Intervention: Mapping is critical! Political Geography, 28, 332–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. J. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780. Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R., & Sorensen, G. (2006). Introduction to international relations: Theories and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantzen, W. (n.d.). Geopolitik im Kartenbild. Heidelberg: Mittelmeer, Vowinckel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1795). Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf, Friedrich Nicolovius, Königsberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepel, G. (2004). The war for Muslim minds. Islam and the west. London: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, S. (2007). Il tempo e lo spazio, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2007 (original edition: The culture of time and space 1880–1918) (p. 1983). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidron, M., & Segal, R. (1981). The state of the world atlas. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidron, M., & Segal, R. (1987). The new state of the world atlas. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidron, M., & Smith, D. (1983). The war atlas. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2007). Rethinking maps. Progress in Human Geography, 31(3), 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellén, R. (1921). Dreibund und Dreiverband. Die diplomatische Vorgeschichte des Weltkriegs. Munich: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohr, L. (1957). The breakdown of nations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konvitz, J. (1987). Cartography in France 1660–1848. Science, engineering, and statecraft. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacoste, Y. (1976). La gèographie, ça sert, d’abord, à faire la guerre. Paris: Maspero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane-Poole, S. (1894). The tables of Mohammedan dynasties. Twenty years’ work upon the Arabic coins in the British Museum. Westminster: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. (2008). L’invention du Monde: une Géographie de la Mondialisation. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, M. (2011). Visual complexity. Mapping patterns of information. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limes. (2009). Rivista Italiana di Geopolitica 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, W. (1965). Public opinion. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loxton, J. (1985). The Peters’ phenomenon. The Cartographical Journal, 22(2), 106–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinder, J. H. (1904). The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal, XXIII(4), 421–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marey, E. J. (1885). La Méthode Graphique. Paris: Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, L. (2001). On representation. Stanford, CA: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mémoires pour servir à l’Histoire Naturelle des Animaux. (1671). Paris: Imprimerie Royale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minca, C., & Białasiewicz, L. (2004). Spazio e politica. Padova: CEDAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monmonier, M. (1990). Strategies for the visualization of geographic time-series data. Cartographica, 27(1), 30–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monmonier, M. (1991). How to lie with maps. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monmonier, M. (1995). Drawing the line: Tales of maps and cartocontroversy. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monmonier, M. (2001). Bushmanders & Bullwinkles. How politicians manipulate electronic maps and census data to win elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, O. (1939). Modern man in the making. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Loughlin, J., & Van der Wusten, H. (1990). Political geography of panregions. Geographical Review, 80, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Tuathail, G. (1996). Critical geopolitics: The politics of writing global space. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Tuathail, G. (1999). Understanding critical geopolitics: Geopolitics and risk society. Journal of Strategic Studies, 22(2/3), 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paasi, A. (1986). The institutionalisation of regions: A theoretical framework for understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity. Fennia, 164, 105–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palsky, G. (2008). Connections and exchanges in European thematic cartography. The case of the 19th century choropleth maps. Belgeo, 3–4, 413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. (1985). Western geopolitical thought in the twentieth century. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickles, J. (2004). A history of spaces: Cartographic reason, mapping and the geo-coded world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polelle, M. (1999). Raising cartographic consciousness: The social and foreign policy vision of geopolitics in the twentieth century. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratzel, F. (1903). Politische Geographie oder die Geographie der Staaten, des Verkehres und des Krieges (2nd ed.). Munich and Berlin: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S. (1980). Eine Familie von Modellen für die vergleichende Geschichte Europas. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 9(2), 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (2004). From Oslo to Iraq and the roadmap. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulten, S. (1998). Richard Edes Harrison and the challenge to American cartography. Imago Mundi, 50, 174–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried, A. (1913). Tableau politique de la France de l’ouest sous la troisième république. Paris: Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried, A. (1950). Atlas international. Paris: Larousse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L. (2005). Networks, territories, and the cartography of ancient states. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(4), 832–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spykman, N. J. (1944). The geography of the peace. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, G. (2009). Why and how place matters. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political science. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valkenburg, S. (1949). Elements of political geography. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayssière, B. H. (1980). ‘La Carte de France’, in Cartes et figures de la Terre, Centre Georges Pompidou, (pp. 252–265).

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Schumacher, R. (1934). Zur Theorie der Raumdarstellung. Zeitschrift für Geopolitik, 11(10), 635–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Schumacher, R. (1935). Zur Theorie der geopolitischen Signatur. Zeitschrift für Geopolitik, 12(4), 247–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vujakovic, P. (1987). The extent of adoption of the Peters projection by “Third World” organizations in the UK. Society of University Cartographers Bulletin, 21(1), 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vujakovic, P. (1989). Peters atlas: A new era of cartography or publishers con-trick? Geography, 74(3), 247–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, H. G. (1921). The outline of history being a plain history of life and mankind. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. C. (2005). The realist tradition and the limits of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1992). The power of maps. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (2010). Rethinking the power of maps. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zook, M. A., & Dodge, M. (2009). Mapping cyberspace. In N. Thrift, & R. Kitchin (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 356–367).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edoardo Boria .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boria, E. (2017). Mapping Power. In: Brunn, S., Dodge, M. (eds) Mapping Across Academia. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1011-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics