Skip to main content

Ethics and Experimental Economics

  • Chapter
  • 911 Accesses

Abstract

A variety of ethical considerations in designing, conducting, and reporting both laboratory and field experiments in economics are reviewed. An important area of ethical concern in experimental economics stems from its use of human subjects. The standards used by Institutional Review Boards to sanction research using human subjects are expounded upon, with an emphasis on application to economics experiments. The authors draw from other experimental researchers and from their own experience to discuss issues related to the interaction of experimenter and subject—e.g., deception, informed consent, blindness, and monetary incentives—and issues related to the interaction of experimenter and consumer of research—e.g., the reporting of negative results, pilot data, or details of the experiment that may offer alternative interpretations of results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barrett, C. B., & Carter, M. R. (2010). The power and pitfalls of experiments in development economics: Some non-random reflections. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 32(4), 515–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., Djankov, S., Hanna, R., & Mullainathan, S. (2007). Obtaining a driver’s license in India: An experimental approach to studying corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1639–1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burtless, G. (1995). The case for randomized field trials in economic and policy research. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearman, D. T., & Beard, J. E. (2009). Ethical issues in accounting and economics experimental research: Inducing strategic misrepresentation. Ethics and Behavior, 19(1), 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elms, A. C. (1972). Social psychology and social relevance. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gugerty, M. K., & Kremer, M. (2008). Outside funding and the dynamics of participation in community associations. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 585–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, A. (2010). New drugs stir debate on rules of clinical trials. New York Times, September 19, 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/health/research/19trial.html?_r=1&emc=eta1

  • Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1998). Detecting discrimination. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegtvedt, K. A. (2007). Ethics and experiments. In W. Murray & S. Jane (Eds.), Laboratory experiments in the social sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 383–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302(5649), 1338–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCoun, R. J., & Kerr, N. L. (1987). Suspicion in the psychological laboratory: Kelman’s prophecy revisited. American Psychologist, 42, 199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madrian, B., & Shea, D. (2001). The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1149–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18, 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nofsinger, J. (2009). Opt-in and opt-out pension design. Psychology Today, August 30, 2009. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mind-my-money/200908/opt-in-and-opt-out-pension-design

  • Thaler, R. (2009). Opting in vs. opting out. New York Times, September 26, 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/27/business/economy/27view.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Ifcher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ifcher, J., Zarghamee, H. (2016). Ethics and Experimental Economics. In: Searing, E., Searing, D. (eds) Practicing Professional Ethics in Economics and Public Policy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7306-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics