Abstract
The philosophical understanding of science that I shall present in this essay is a product of the confrontation of some of my prejudices, or preconceptions, with contemporary developments in science and in reflective thinking. The preconceptions can be roughly summarized by a label ‘scientific humanism’, which was handed down to me through the works of Descartes, Leibniz, Kant, Hegel, Marx, and other thinkers in the same tradition. According to this tradition, our species as a rational subject is able to discover objective truth and universal norms, upon which systems of thought and action can be built, so that nature can be conquered, social life rationally restructured, and the human being emancipated from ignorance, superstitions and prejudices, from poverty and scarcity, and from all kinds of domination by irrational traditions and arbitrary authorities. In other words, human history is a progressive process toward emancipation, of which reason — its most sophisticated and effective achievement is scientific knowledge — is the major source and vehicle.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cao, T.Y. (1995). A Philosopher Looks at Science. In: Gavroglu, K., Stachel, J., Wartofsky, M.W. (eds) Physics, Philosophy, and the Scientific Community. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 163. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2658-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2658-0_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4436-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2658-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive