Abstract
The canonical model of science as a unified body of universal, objective truth has now to be set against a variety of studies locating science in historical, philosophical and sociological perspectives. Detailed analyses on the history of epistemology, on the cultural origins of science and on the practice of science reveal science as diverse, heterogeneous and disunited, taking a variety of different forms depending on the discipline, the location and the period in question (Dupré, 1993; Galison, 1997; Galison and Stump, 1996; Law, 1987; Rosenberg, 1994; Star, 1989). The unity, stability and cohesion of science, which according to the standard realist/rationalist view are due to its fidelity with a unified reality, are seen as social and historical accomplishments. Similarly the universality of science has been found to result from specific forms of social organization in coordinating and transmitting scientific knowledge rather than from its inherent truth. These alternative conceptions of the production of scientific knowledge raise crucial problems for our understanding of ‘rationality‘, that is our capacity to choose critically between differing accounts of reality. By implication it also raises problems for the canonical model of mathematics as a paradigmatic cultural universal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Agrawal, A. ‘Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge.’ Development and Change 26(3): 413–439, 1995.
Albury, R. The Politics of Objectivity. Geelong: Deakin University Press, 1983.
Allport, P. ‘Still searching for the Holy Grail.’ New Scientist 132: 51–2, Oct 5th, 1991.
Bunge, M. ‘Seven desiderata for rationality.’ In Rationality: The Critical View, J. Agassi and I. C. Jarvie, eds. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987, pp. 5–17.
Cartwright, N. How The Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
Collins, H. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage, 1985.
Collins, H. and T. Pinch. The Golem at Large: What You Should Know About Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Collins, H. and T. Pinch. The Golem: What You Should Know About Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Daston, L. ‘Objectivity and the escape from perspective.’ Social Studies of Science 22: 597–618, 1992.
Daston, L. ‘The moral economy of science.’ Osiris 10 (Constructing Knowledge in the History of Science): 1–26, 1995.
Davidson, A. ‘Arbitrage.’ Thesis Eleven 38: 158–62, 1994.
Dean, M. Critical and Effective History: Foucault’s Methods and Historical Sociology. London: Routledge, 1994.
Dear, P. ‘From truth to disinterestedness in the Seventeenth Century.’ Social Studies of Science 22: 619–31, 1992.
Dear, P. Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell. ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality.’ In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, W. Powell and P. DiMaggio, eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, pp. 63–82.
Duhem, P. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton: rinceton University Press, 1954.
Dupré, J. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Feyerabend, P. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchist Theory of Knowledge. London: Verso, 1978.
Finnegan, R. Literacy and Orality: Studies in the Technology of Communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.
Fortun, M. and H. Bernstein. Muddling Through: Pursuing Science and Truths in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Counterpoint, 1998.
Foucault, M. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–77. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.
Friedland, R. and R. Alford. ‘Bringing society back in: symbols, practices and institutional contradictions.’ In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, W. Powell and P. DiMaggio, eds.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, pp. 232–266.
Galison, P. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.
Galison, P. and D. Stump, eds. The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts and Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.
Geertz, C. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
Hacking, I. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Hacking, I. ‘The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences.’ In Science as Practice and Culture, A. Pickering, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992, pp. 29–64.
Haraway, D. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books, 1991.
Hayles, K. Chaos Bound: Orderly Disorder in Contemporary Literature and Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.
Hesse, M. Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Sussex, Harvester Press, 1980.
Hollis, M. and S. Lukes, eds. Rationality and Relativism. Oxford: asil Blackwell, 1982.
Huff, T. The Rise of Early Modern Science: Islam, China and the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Ivins, W. M. Prints and Visual Communication. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1953.
King, M. D. ‘Reason, tradition, and the progressiveness of science.’ In Paradigms and Revolutions: Applications and Appraisals of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, G. Gutting, ed. South Bend, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1980, pp. 97–116.
Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: niversity of Chicago Press, 1970.
Latour, B. ‘Visualisation and cognition: thinking with eyes and hands.’ Knowledge and Society 6: 1–40, 1986.
Latour, B. Science In Action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1987.
Lave, J. Cognition in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Law, J. ‘Technology and heterogeneous engineering: the case of Portuguese expansion.’ In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, W. Bijker, T. Hughes and T. Pinch, eds. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987, pp. 111–34.
Marcus, G. E. and ]M. M. J. Fischer. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
Nader, L., ed. Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power and Knowledge. New York: Routledge, 1996.
Nanda, M. ‘The science question in postcolonial feminism.’ In The Flight From Science and Reason, P. Gross, N. Levitt and M. Lewis, eds. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1997, pp. 420–36.
Nanda, M. ‘The epistemic charity of the constructivist critics of science and why the third world should refuse the offer.’ In A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science, N. Koertge, ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 286–311.
Ophir, A. and S. Shapin. ‘The place of knowledge: a methodological survey.’ Science in Context 4: 3–21, 1991.
Pickering, A. ‘Objectivity and the mangle of practice.’ Annals of Scholarship 8: 409–425, 1991.
Pickering, A., ed. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: niversity of Chicago Press, 1992.
Pickering, A. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
Poovey, M. A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Popper, K. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge Kegan Paul, 1963.
Quine, W. V. O. From a Logical Point of View: Logico-Philosophical Essays. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1963.
Rosenberg, A. Instrumental Biology or the Disunity of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Rouse, J. Knowledge and Power: Towards a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.
Salmond, A. ‘Maori epistemologies.’ In Reason and Morality, J. Overing, ed. London: Tavistock, 1985, pp. 240–63.
Schuster, J. A. and R. Yeo, eds. The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986.
Shapin, S. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in 17th Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Shapin, S. ‘Placing the view from nowhere: historical and sociological problems in the location of science.’ Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23: 5–12, 1998.
Shapin, S. and S. Schaffer. Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.
Star, S. L. ‘The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving.’ In Distributed Artificial Intelligence, L. Gasser and N. Huhns, eds. New York: Morgan Kauffman Publications, 1989, pp. 37–54.
Street, B. V. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: ambridge University Press, 1984.
Thrift, N. ‘Flies and germs: a geography of knowledge.’ In Social Relations and Spatial Structures, D. Gregory and J. Urry, eds. London: Macmillan, 1985, pp. 366–403.
Turnbull, D. ‘Local knowledge and comparative scientific traditions.’ Knowledge and Policy 6(3/4): 29–54, 1993.
Turnbull, D. ‘Reframing science and other local knowledge traditions.’ Futures 29(6): 551–62, 1997.
Turnbull, D. Masons, Tricksters and Cartographers: Makers of Knowledge and Space. Reading: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999, in press.
Watson-Verran, H. and D. Turnbull. ‘Science and other indigenous knowledge systems.’ In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, T. Pinch and J. Petersen, eds. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 1995, pp. 115–139.
Weber, M. ‘Law, rationalism and capitalism.’ In Law and Society, C. M. Campbell and P. Wiles, eds. Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1979, pp. 51–89.
Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: lackwell, 1958.
Wynne, B. ‘Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and public uptake of science.’ In Misunderstanding Science: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, A. Irwin and B. Wynne, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 19–46.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turnbull, D. (2000). Rationality and The Disunity of The Sciences. In: Selin, H. (eds) Mathematics Across Cultures. Science Across Cultures: The History of Non-Western Science, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4301-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4301-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0260-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4301-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive