Skip to main content

Foster Care Breakdown: A Study of a Special Teenager Fostering Scheme

  • Chapter
Book cover The State as Parent

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 53))

Abstract

The overwhelming majority of children boarded out with foster parents are still at the younger end of the age range, but many public and voluntary agencies have established special placement projects to find families for adolescents, teenagers or other traditional “hard to place” groups. Anxiety of placements which “fail” is no less prevalent among this older group as the effects of disruption are perhaps more strongly felt. This paper is an empirical investigation into the factors which cause placements to fail in one such special fostering scheme: the Kent Family Placement Scheme (KFPS). Using routine monitoring procedures we explore the factors which are associated with, and predictive of, placement breakdown. A further aim has been to comment on the research methodology commonly used in previous breakdown research, which has rarely taken full advantage of the data collected. A description of the KFPS and a brief discussion of alternate measures of outcomes and definitions of breakdown are followed by an exposition of logit analysis — the methodology employed in this study. The results of these analyses — in which we successfully predict 79 per cent of placement outcomes — are reported under three heads: teenager characteristics, foster placement characteristics and child care practices. Implications for care practice are highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldgate, J. & Hawley, D. (1986). Preventing disruption in long-term foster care. Adoption and Fostering, 10(3), 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, D. & Cleaver, H. (1987). Foster home breakdown. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, L.H. & Remy, L.L. (1978). Is foster parent training worthwhile? Social Service Review, 52, 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cautley, P.W. (1980). New foster parents. New York: Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Social Security (1976). Foster Care. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devon County Council (1981). Study of fostering terminations, Mimeograph, Devon C.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donley, K. (1978). The dynamics of disruption. Adoption and Fostering, 2(2)., 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanshell, D. & Shinn, E.B. (1978). Children in foster care. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazel, N. (1981). A bridge to independence. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millham, S., Bullock, R., Hosie, K., & Haak, M. (1986). Lost in care. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, L.J. (1982). Predicting the permanency status of children in foster care. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 18 (1), 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardeck, J.T. (1982). The forgotten children. Washington DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R.A. (1966). Decision in child care. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R.A. (1983). A forward look at the research and the child in care mimeograph, University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R.A. (1988). Residential care for children. In I. Sinclair (Ed.) Residential Care: The Research Reviewed. Volume 2: Wagner Committee Report. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proch, K. & Taber, M.A. (1985). Placement disruption: a review of research. Children and Youth Services Review, 7, 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, J.A. Schmidt, D. & Conner, J. (1988). Predictors of special needs adoption disruption: An exploratory study. Children and Youth Services Review, 10(2), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. (1987). Fostering outcomes: Interpreting breakdown rates. Adoption and Fostering, 11(1), 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J., Cain, H., Hundleby, M. & Keane, A. (1984). Long-term foster care. London: Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. & Hipgrave, T. (1983). Specialist fostering. London: Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoburn, J. (1989). The effectiveness of permanent substitute family placement for older children in care. Paper prepared for NATO ARW, Maratea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J.A. & Matule, V.P. (1984). A formal statistical model for the prediction of stability of placement of foster children in the Casey Family Program. Unpublished paper cited in Prosch and Taber (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fenyo, A., Knapp, M., Baines, B. (1989). Foster Care Breakdown: A Study of a Special Teenager Fostering Scheme. In: Hudson, J., Galaway, B. (eds) The State as Parent. NATO ASI Series, vol 53. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1053-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1053-9_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6965-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1053-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics