Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Updates in Surgery ((UPDATESSURG))

  • 1211 Accesses

Abstract

Acute emergency situations often pose a diagnostic challenge to the general surgeon. The diagnosis is important due to the different pathologic conditions that might be responsible for the acute situation and therefore important for planning the correct abdominal incision or avoiding an unnecessary laparotomy. There are several noninvasive diagnostic procedures — such as ultrasonography and CT scanning — which can be performed along with plain film radiography on patients with an acute abdomen to aid the surgeon in establishing a preoperative diagnosis [1–12]. In experienced hands, which are not always available around the clock in every hospital setting, the results of these methods are quite good, but in general practice they are not completely accurate and conclusive (partly due to the patients’ physical limitations, e.g. obesity or massive bowel distension, and partly because, as already stated, they are dependent on operator skills) and they might be time-consuming and expensive (such as CT scanning) [13–15]. Another factor to keep in mind is that nowadays the mean patient age is increasing and, as a consequence, there is an increasing possibility of being confronted with emergency abdominal situations in the elderly with many co-morbidities which complicate not only the therapeutic strategy but the diagnostic approach as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agresta F, Mazzarolo G, Ciardo LF, Bedin N (2008) The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: has the attitude changed? A single-center review of a 15-year experience. Surg Endosc 22:1255–1262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Balèn E, Herrea M, Tarifa A et al (2005) El papel de la laparoscopia en la cirugìa abdominal urgente (The role of laparoscopy in emergency abdominal surgery). An Sist Sanit Naz 28:81–92

    Google Scholar 

  3. Golash V, Willson PD (2005) Early laparoscopy as a routine procedure in the management of acute abdominal pain. A review of 1320 patients. Surg Endosc 19:882–885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kirshtein B, Roy-Shapira A, Lantsberg L et al (2003) The use of laparoscopy in abdominal emergencies. Surg Endosc 17:1118–1124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lam CM, Yuen AW, Chik B et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for common surgical emergencies. A population-based study. Surg Endosc 19:774–779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sauerlenad S, Agresta F, Bergamaschi R et al (2006) Laparoscopic for abdominal emergencies. Evidence based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 20:14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Champault G, Descottes B, Dulucq JL et a (2006) Chirurgie laparoscopique: les recommandations des sociétés savantes spécialisées en 2006, SFCL-SFCE. J Chir (Paris) 143:160–164

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Warren O, Kinross J, Paraskeva P, Darzi A (2007) Emergency laparoscopy — current best practice. WJES 1:24

    Google Scholar 

  9. Domìnguez LC, Sanabria A, Vega V, Osorio C (2011) Early laparoscopy for the evaluation of non specific abdominal pain: a critical appraisal of the evidence. Surg Endosc 25:10–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morino M, Pellegrino L, Castagna E et al (2006) Acute nonspecific abdominal pain: a randomized, controlled trial comparing early laparoscopy versus clinical observation. Ann Surg 244:881–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fowler DL Laparoscopy in the Acute Abdomen in Controversies in Laparoscopic Surgery. Assalia A, Gagner M, Schein M Editors — Springer Berlin Heidelkberg 2006, pagg. 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stefanidis D, Richardson WS, Chang L et al (2009) The role of diagnostic laparoscopy for acute abdominal conditions: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc 23:16–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Salem TA, Molly RG, O’Dwyer PJ (2005) Prospective study on the role of the CT scan in patients with an acute abdomen. Colorectal Dis 7:460–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stoker J, van Randen A, Lamèris W, Boermeester MA (2009) Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology 253:31–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Andersson RE (2011) Routine ultrasound and limited computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a surgeon’s perspective. World J Surg 35:295–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fuganti PE, Rodrigues AJ, Rodrigues CJ, Sato M (2006) A comparison of the effects of pneumoperitoneum and laparotomy on natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity and Walker tumor growth in Wistar rats. Surg Endosc 20:1858–1861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nordentoft T, Bringstrup FA, Bremmelgaard A, Stage JG (2000) Effect of laparoscopy on bacteremia in acute appendicitis: a randomized controlled study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:302–304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Strobel O, Wachter D, Werner J et al (2006) Effect of a pneumoperitoneum on systemic cytokine levels, bacterial translocation, and organ complications in a rat model of severe acute pancreatitis with infected necrosis. Surg Endosc 20:1897–1903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moberg AC, Montgomery A (2006) Pneumoperitoneum — Update 2006. In: Neugebauer EAM, Saurland S, Fingerhut A et al (eds) EAES guidelines for endoscopic surgery — twelve years evidence-based surgery in Europe, Springer, Berlin, pp. 87–95

    Google Scholar 

  20. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E et al (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Esposito S (2001) Immune system and surgical site infection. J Chemother 13[Suppl 1]:12–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mattei P (2007) Minimally invasive surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal pain in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 19:338–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lyon C, Clark D (2006) Diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in older patients. Am Fam Physician 74:1537–1541

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kirshtein B, Perry ZH, Mizrahi S, Lantsberg L (2009) Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly patient. World J Surg 33:918–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hon Y; SAGES Guidelines Committee (2008) Diagnostic laparoscopy guidelines. Surg Endosc 22:1353–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shum CF, Lim JF, Soo KC, Wong WK (2005) On-table diagnostic accuracy and the clinical significance of routine exploration in open appendectomies. Asian J Surg 28:257–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stocchi L (2010) Current indications and role of surgery in the management of sigmoid diverticulitis. World J Gastroenterol 16:804–817

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2006) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD005440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sanabria AE, Morales CH, Villegas MI (2005) Laparoscopic repair for perforated perpic ulcer disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004778

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bertleff MJ, Lange JF (2010) Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature. Surg Endosc 24:1231–1239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sajid MS, Khan MA, Cheek E, Baig M K (2009) Needlescopic versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review. Can J Surg 52:129–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chiu CC, Wei PL, Wang W et al (2006) Role of appendectomy in laparoscopic training. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 16:113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Grafen CF, Neuhaus V, Schöb O, Turina M (2010) Management of acute small bowel obstruction for intestinal adhesions: indications for laparoscopy surgery in a community teaching hospital. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:57–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zerey M, Sechrist C, Kercher K et al (2007) Laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Am Surg 73:773–778

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cirocchi R, Abraha I, Farinella E et al (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery in small bowel obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD007511

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Corneille MG, Steigelman MB, Myers JG et al (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy in obese patients. Am J Surg 194:877–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tzovaras G, Baloyiannis I, Kouritas V et al (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in men: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 24:2987–2992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ghosheh B, Salameh JR (2007) Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: review of 1061 cases. Surg Endosc 21:1945–1949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Deeba S, Purkayastha S, Paraskevas P et al (2009) Laparoscopic approach to incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernias. JSLS 3:327–331

    Google Scholar 

  40. Korndorffer JR Jr, Fellinger E, Reed W (2010) SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 24:757–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suggested Readings

  • Sauerland S, Agresta F, Bergamaschi R, Borzellino G, Budzynski A, Champault G, Fingerhut A, Isla A, Johansson M, Lundorff P (2006) Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies. Evidencebased guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 20:14–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Agresta F, Ansaloni L, Baiocchi L, Bergamini C, Campanile FB, Carlucci M, Cocorullo G, Corradi A, Franzato B, Lupo M, Mandalà V, Mirabella A, Pernazza G, Piccoli M, Staudacher C, Vettoretto N, Zago M, Lettieri E, Levati A, Pietrini D, Scaglione M, De Masi S, De Placido G, Francucci M, Rasi M, Scaramuzza G, Del Favero AL (2011) Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE); Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI); Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC); Società Italiana Chirurgia d’Urgenza e Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana Chirurghi dell’Ospedalità Privata (SICOP) and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). In press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Agresta, F., Mirabella, A., Bedin, N., Mandalà, V. (2012). Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Abdominal Emergencies. In: Mandalà, V. (eds) The Role of Laparoscopy in Emergency Abdominal Surgery. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2327-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2327-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2326-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2327-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics