Abstract
Biology may be able to modify philosophers’ views of the question of realism in science. Two classical notions of realism are considered: “scientific realism” (which assume the objective reality of theoretical entities), and the metaphysical thesis of the independent reality of the world. The realism of theoretical entities, which is a modern version of the “realism of universals”, is rendered problematic by the extreme difficulty these sciences face in constructing laws out of their generalisations, and thus their difficulty in identifying natural kinds. The category of scientific realism raises particular problems in the case of the biological sciences: a science that is confronted throughout its range by the historical singularity of its objects. On the other hand, modern biology, and particularly evolutionary biology, provides some strong arguments that pose a problem for realism as a postulate of an independent external world: we are not pure intelligences. In a biological perspective, and more especially in an evolutionary perspective, what matters is not an independent world, but a surrounding world. This suggests that the goal of this mode of knowledge is to construct intelligible models that can respond to the complexity of the human environment, rather than to construct a global and unified image of the world.
Université Paris 1-Panthéon Sorbonne (Institut d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences et des techniques, Unité Mixte de Recherche 8590 Paris 1-CNRS). I should emphasise that my participation in the Bielefeld conference was motivated and supported by Paris 7 University, to which I belonged formerly. I want to express special thanks to Jochen Hoock, vice-president of Paris 7, who kindly asked me to participate. I also thank Matthew Cobb for his help in translating the present paper.
To Marjorie Grene, who inspired major aspects of this paper
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bachelard, Gaston (1931–32), “Noumène et microphysique,” Recherches philosophiques, vol. 1, pp. 55–65 [Reproduit dans Gaston Bachelard (1970, pp. 11–24)].
Bachelard, Gaston (1970), Etudes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Beatty, John (1995), “The evolutionary contingency thesis.” In: Wolters/Lennox (eds.; 1995 ), pp. 45–106.
Carrier, Martin (1995), “Evolutionary Change and Lawlikeness: Beatty on Biological Generalizations.” In: Wolters/Lennox (eds.; 1995 ), pp. 83–97.
Carrier, Martin, Johannes Roggenhofer, Günter Küppers, and Philippe Blanchard (2001), preliminary presentation of “Journées scientifiques au ZIF: Monde et savoir; à propos de la construction des savoirs scientifiques—L’objet et but de la réunion” (18–20 juin 2001, Bielefeld) (French; my translation).
Cosmides, Leda and John Tooby (1987), “From Evolution to Behavior: Evolutionary Psychology as the Missing Link ” In: DUPRÉ (ed.; 1987 ), pp. 277–306.
Cunningham, Suzan (1996), Philosophy and the Darwinian Legacy. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
Dancy, Jonathan and Ernest Sosa (1992), A Companion to Epistemology. London: Blackwell.
Dupré, John (ed.; 1987 ), The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution ad Optimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gibson, James J. (1979), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Grene, Marjorie (1995), A Philosophical Testament. Chicago: Open Court. Gayon, Jean (1993), “La biologie entre loi et histoire, ” Philosophie vol. 38, pp. 30–57.
Heelan, Patrick A. (1990), “réalisme (néo-),” Encyclopédie philosophique universelle, vol. 2. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France I I.
Hull, David (1974), The Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Hull, David (1978), “A Matter of Individuality,” philosopy of Science, vol. 45, pp. 335–360.
Hume, David (1910), An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. New York: P. F. Collier Son [Harvard Classics, vol. 37; First published in 1748 ].
Pettit, Phillip (1992), “Realism.” In: Dancy/Sosa (eds.; 1992 ),pp. 420–424.
Piaget, Jean (1950), Introduction à l’épistémologie génétique, vol. 3, La Pensée biologique, la pensée psychologique et la pensée sociologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Rosenberg, Alexander (1994), Instrumental Biology or the Disunity of Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Russell, Bertrand (21926), Our Knowledge of the External World. London, Allen Unwin.
Smart, John J. C. (1963), Philosophy and Scientific Realism. New York: The Humanities Press.190 Jean Gayon
Sober, Elliott (1984), The Nature of Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolters, Gereon and James G. Lennox (eds.; 1995 ), Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag Konstanz
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gayon, J. (2004). Realism and Biological Knowledge. In: Carrier, M., Roggenhofer, J., Küppers, G., Blanchard, P. (eds) Knowledge and the World: Challenges Beyond the Science Wars. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08129-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08129-7_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05905-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-08129-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive