Skip to main content

Summary

Much has been written about the Turing Test in the last few years, some of it preposterously off the mark. People typically mis-imagine the test by orders of magnitude. This essay is an antidote, a prosthesis for the imagination, showing how huge the task posed by the Turing Test is, and hence how unlikely it is that any computer will ever pass it. It does not go far enough in the imagination-enhancement department, however, and I have updated the essay with a new postscript.

Originally appeared in Michael G. Shafto, editor, How We Know: Nobel Conference XX, Harper & Row, San Francisco, CA, 1985. Reprinted with permission of HarperCollins Publishers Inc., New York.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Block, N., 1982, “Psychologism and Behaviorism,” Philosophical Review, 90:5–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Colby, K. M., 1981, “Modeling a Paranoid Mind,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4(4):515–560.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Descartes, R., 1637, Discourse on Method, LaFleur, Lawrence, trans., New York: Bobbs Merrill, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haugeland, J., 1981, Mind Design: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heiser, J. F., Colby, K. M., Faught, W. S., and Parkinson, R. C., 1980, “Can Psychiatrists Distinguish a Computer Simulation of Paranoia from the Real Thing? The Limitations of Turing-Like Tests as Measures of the Adequacy of Simulations,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, 15(3): 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kolodner, J. L., 1983, “Retrieval and Organization Strategies in Conceptual Memory: A Computer Model” (Ph.D. diss.), Research Report #187, Dept. of Computer Science, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kolodner, J. L., 1983, “Maintaining Organization in a Dynamic Long-term Memory,” Cognitive Science, 7:243–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolodner, J. L., 1983, “Reconstructive Memory: A Computer Model,” Cognitive Science, 7:281–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Turing, A. M., 1950, “Computing Machinery and Intelligence,” Mind, 59(236):433–460.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Weizenbaum, J., 1974, letter to the editor, Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery, 17(9), September.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Winograd, T., 1972, Understanding Natural Language, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dennett, D.C. (2004). Can Machines Think?. In: Teuscher, C. (eds) Alan Turing: Life and Legacy of a Great Thinker. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05642-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05642-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05744-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05642-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics