Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Einsatzmöglichkeiten Künstlicher Intelligenz in der Hochschulbildung – Ausgewählte Ergebnisse eines Systematic Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digitale Bildung und Künstliche Intelligenz in Deutschland

Part of the book series: AKAD University Edition ((AKAD))

Zusammenfassung

Bereits seit über einem halben Jahrhundert wird zur Entwicklung von Künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) geforscht und entwickelt. Durch die weltweite Vernetzung und Verfügbarkeit von Daten („big data“) und eine entsprechende Rechenkapazität der Computer sind heute Anwendungen und Methoden möglich geworden, die in den letzten Jahren verstärkt auch im Kontext des Lernens und Lehrens an Hochschulen diskutiert werden. Auf der Grundlage eines Systematic Reviews mit 146 inkludierten Studien wird in dem Beitrag ein Überblick über aktuelle Entwicklungen und potenzielle Anwendungsbereiche von AIEd (Artificial Intelligence in Education) gegeben. Hierbei wird auch eine kritische Perspektive zu den hiermit verbundenen ethischen und rechtlichen Herausforderungen eingenommen.

Der vorliegende Beitrag fasst Ergebnisse eines Systematic Reviews zusammen, das im International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education unter der Lizenz CC-BY veröffentlicht wurde: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.tue.nl/en/news/news-overview/11-07-2019-tue-announces-eaisi-new-institute-for-intelligentmachines/ (Zugriff am 16.12.2019).

  2. 2.

    Wall Street Journal: https://twitter.com/wsj/status/1177357178975457285?s=21

Literatur

  • Acikkar, M., & Akay, M. F. (2009). Support vector machines for predicting the admission decision of a candidate to the School of Physical Education and Sports at Cukurova University. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3 PART 2), 7228–7233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amigud, A., Arnedo-Moreno, J., Daradoumis, T., & Guerrero-Roldan, A.-E. (2017). Using learning analytics for preserving academic integrity. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(5), 192–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andris, C., Cowen, D., & Wittenbach, J. (2013). Support Vector Machine for Spatial Variation. Transactions in GIS, 17(1), 41–61. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T., & Smith, L. (2019). Educ-AI-tion Rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. Nesta Foundation. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Future_of_AI_and_education_v5_WEB.pdf. Zugegriffen: 31. Dez. 2019.

  • Blikstein, P., Worsley, M., Piech, C., Sahami, M., Cooper, S., & Koller, D. (2014). Programming pluralism: Using learning analytics to detect patterns in the learning of computer programming. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 561–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, R. A., O’Rourke, S. T., Jones, J., Yacef, K., & Reimann, P. (2011). Collaborative Writing Support Tools on the Cloud. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(1), 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casamayor, A., Amandi, A., & Campo, M. (2009). Intelligent assistance for teachers in collaborative e-Learning environments. Part of Special Issue: Learning with ICT: New Perspectives on Help Seeking and Information Searching, 53(4), 1147–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhri, V. K., Cheng, B., Overtholtzer, A., Roschelle, J., Spaulding, A., Clark, P., … & Gunning, D. (2013). Inquire biology: A textbook that answers questions. AI Magazine, 34(3), 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobos, C., Rodriguez, O., Rivera, J., Betancourt, J., Mendoza, M., León, E., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2013). A hybrid system of pedagogical pattern recommendations based on singular value decomposition and variable data attributes. Information Processing & Management, 49(3), 607–625. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Contact North. (2018). Ten facts about artificial intelligence in teaching and learning. https://teachonline.ca/sites/default/files/tools-trends/downloads/ten_facts_about_artificial_intelligence.pdf. Zugegriffen: 31. Dez. 2019.

  • Copeland, M. (2016). What’s the difference between artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning? https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2016/07/29/whats-difference-artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-deep-learning-ai/. Zugegriffen: 31. Dez. 2019.

  • Delen, D. (2011). Predicting student attrition with data mining methods. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 13(1), 17–35. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobre, I. (2014). Assessing the student’s knowledge in informatics discipline using the METEOR metric. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19), 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drachsler, H., & Greller, W. (2016). Privacy and analytics: It’s a DELICATE issue a checklist for trusted learning analytics. In D. Gasevic &Ù G. Lynch et al. (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the sixth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge – LAK ’16 (S. 89–98). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. 

    Google Scholar 

  • EDUCAUSE. (2019). Horizon report: 2019 higher education edition. EDUCAUSE learning initiative and The New Media Consortium website. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2019/4/2019horizonreport.pdf. Zugegriffen: 31. Dez. 2019.

  • Gierl, M., Latifi, S., Lai, H., Boulais, A., & Champlain, A. (2014). Automated essay scoring and the future of educational assessment in medical education. Medical Education, 48(10), 950–962. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2. Aufl.). Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinojo-Lucena, F.-J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M.-P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Study on its Impact in the Scientific Literature. Education Sciences, 9(1), Art. 51, 1–9. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffait, A.-S., & Schyns, M. (2017). Early detection of university students with potential difficulties. Decision Support Systems, 101(September 2017), 1–11. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, C., Jordan, P., Di Eugenio, B., & Katz, S. (2017). Shifting the load: A peer dialogue agent that encourages its human collaborator to contribute more to problem solving. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.), 27(1), 101–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, E., Meehan, M., & Parnell, A. (2018). Contrasting prediction methods for early warning systems at undergraduate level. Internet and Higher Education,37 (April 2018), 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., & Chen, Z. (2016). The research and design of web-based intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 11(6), 337–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, M., Zhu, W., Zhang, W., & Abidi, S. M. R. (2018). Student engagement predictions in an e-Learning system and their impact on student course assessment scores. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2018, 6347186, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias, A., Martinez, P., Aler, R., & Fernandez, F. (2009). Reinforcement learning of pedagogical policies in adaptive and intelligent educational systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 22(4), 266–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M., & Cossitt, B. (2015). Is intelligent online tutoring software useful in refreshing financial accounting knowledge? Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations, 16, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kose, U., & Arslan, A. (2016). Intelligent E-Learning system for improving students’ academic achievements in computer programming courses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1, A), 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. (2007). Intelligent agent-supported online education. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(2), 311–331. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339(jul21 1), b2700–b2700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, J.-J., Chan, Y.-C., & Yeh, S.-W. (2012). Designing an adaptive web-based learning system based on students’ cognitive styles identified online. Computers & Education, 58(1), 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, S. C., Wong, C. K., Lee, T. S., & Lee, F. Y. (2011). Design of an agent-based academic information system for effective education management. Information Technology Journal, 10(9), 1784–1788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. (1995). Managing learner support. In F. Lockwood (Hrsg.), Open and distance learning today (S. 265–275). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. J., Norvig, P., & Davis, E. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3. Aufl.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiaffino, S., Garcia, P., & Amandi, A. (2008). eTeacher: Providing personalized assistance to e-learning students. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1744–1754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Díaz, J. C., Infante Moro, A., & Valdiviezo Díaz, P. (2014). MOOCs and personalized massification [Los MOOC y la masificación personalizada]. Profesorado, 18(1), 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlugter, P., Knott, A., McDonald, J., & Hall, C. (2009). Dialogue-based CALL: a case study on teaching pronouns. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2), 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston-Sementelli, J. L., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2018). Comprehension and writing strategy training improves performance on content-specific source-based writing tasks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(1), 106–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuanyuan, J., & Yajuan, L. (2014). Development of an intelligent teaching system based on 3D technology in the course of digital animation production. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(9), 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., & Buntins, K. (Hrsg.). (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), Art. 39, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zierer, K. (2018). Lernen 4.0: Pädagogik vor Technik: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer Digitalisierung im Bildungsbereich (2., erweiterte Aufl.). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Deutschland

    Olaf Zawacki-Richter

  2. Oldenburg, Deutschland

    Victoria Marin

  3. Oldenburg, Deutschland

    Melissa Bond

  4. Oldenburg, Deutschland

    Franziska Gouverneur

Authors
  1. Olaf Zawacki-Richter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Victoria Marin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Melissa Bond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Franziska Gouverneur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olaf Zawacki-Richter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. AKAD University, Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Ronny Alexander Fürst

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Der/die Herausgeber bzw. der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marin, V., Bond, M., Gouverneur, F. (2020). Einsatzmöglichkeiten Künstlicher Intelligenz in der Hochschulbildung – Ausgewählte Ergebnisse eines Systematic Review. In: Fürst, R.A. (eds) Digitale Bildung und Künstliche Intelligenz in Deutschland. AKAD University Edition. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30525-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30525-3_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-30524-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-30525-3

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation