Abstract
The seven pillars of the AHP, some highlights of which are discussed in the paper, are: 1) ratio scales derived from reciprocal paired comparisons; 2) paired comparisons and the psychophysical origin of the fundamental scale used to make the comparisons; 3) conditions for sensitivity of the eigenvector to changes in judgments; 4) homogeneity and clustering to extend the scale from 1–9 to 1- ∞; 5) additive synthesis of priorities, leading to a vector of multi-linear forms as applied within the decision structure of a hierarchy or the more general feedback network to reduce multi-dimensional measurements to a unidimensional normalized ratio scale, that is thus an absolute “dominance” scale, free of a measurement unit; 6) allowing rank preservation (ideal mode) or allowing rank reversal (distributive mode); and 7) group decision making using a mathematically justifiable way for synthesizing individual judgments which allows the construction of a cardinal group decision compatible with the individual preferences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Refrences
Buede, D. and D.T. Maxwell, (1995) Rank Disagreement: A Comparison of Multicriteria Methodologies. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 4, 1–21.
Luce, R. D. and H. Raiffa, (1957) Games and Decisions. Wiley, New York.
Millet, I. and T.L. Saaty, (1999) On the Relativity of Relative Measures-Accommodating Both Rank Preservation and Rank Reversal in the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research.
Peniwati, K., (1996) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: The Possibility for Group Decision Making, pp. 202–214. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Vancouver, Canada. (Obtainable from RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.)
Saaty, T. L., (1999-2000 ed.) Decision Making For Leaders. RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Saaty, T. L., (2000) The Brain, Unraveling the Mystery of How It Works: The Neural Network Process. RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Saaty, T. L. and G. Hu, (1998) Ranking by Eigenvector Versus Other Methods in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Appl. Math. Letters,Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 121–125.
Saaty, T. L., (1996) Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Saaty, T. L., (1994) Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory. RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Saaty, T. L., (1990) Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Saaty, T.L. and L. G. Vargas, (1993) Experiments on Rank Preservation and Reversal in Relative Measurement. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 17, No. 4/5, pp. 13–18.
Vargas, L. G., (1994) Reply to Schenkerman’s Avoiding Rank Reversal in AHP Decision Support Models. European Journal of Operational Research, 74, pp. 420–425.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Saaty, T.L. (2001). The Seven Pillars of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: Köksalan, M., Zionts, S. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millennium. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 507. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56680-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56680-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42377-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56680-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive