Skip to main content

The Seven Pillars of the Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • Conference paper
Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millennium

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 507))

Abstract

The seven pillars of the AHP, some highlights of which are discussed in the paper, are: 1) ratio scales derived from reciprocal paired comparisons; 2) paired comparisons and the psychophysical origin of the fundamental scale used to make the comparisons; 3) conditions for sensitivity of the eigenvector to changes in judgments; 4) homogeneity and clustering to extend the scale from 1–9 to 1- ∞; 5) additive synthesis of priorities, leading to a vector of multi-linear forms as applied within the decision structure of a hierarchy or the more general feedback network to reduce multi-dimensional measurements to a unidimensional normalized ratio scale, that is thus an absolute “dominance” scale, free of a measurement unit; 6) allowing rank preservation (ideal mode) or allowing rank reversal (distributive mode); and 7) group decision making using a mathematically justifiable way for synthesizing individual judgments which allows the construction of a cardinal group decision compatible with the individual preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Refrences

  • Buede, D. and D.T. Maxwell, (1995) Rank Disagreement: A Comparison of Multicriteria Methodologies. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 4, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. and H. Raiffa, (1957) Games and Decisions. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millet, I. and T.L. Saaty, (1999) On the Relativity of Relative Measures-Accommodating Both Rank Preservation and Rank Reversal in the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peniwati, K., (1996) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: The Possibility for Group Decision Making, pp. 202–214. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Vancouver, Canada. (Obtainable from RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., (1999-2000 ed.) Decision Making For Leaders. RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., (2000) The Brain, Unraveling the Mystery of How It Works: The Neural Network Process. RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. and G. Hu, (1998) Ranking by Eigenvector Versus Other Methods in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Appl. Math. Letters,Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 121–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., (1996) Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., (1994) Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory. RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., (1990) Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L. and L. G. Vargas, (1993) Experiments on Rank Preservation and Reversal in Relative Measurement. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 17, No. 4/5, pp. 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, L. G., (1994) Reply to Schenkerman’s Avoiding Rank Reversal in AHP Decision Support Models. European Journal of Operational Research, 74, pp. 420–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saaty, T.L. (2001). The Seven Pillars of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: Köksalan, M., Zionts, S. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millennium. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 507. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56680-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56680-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42377-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56680-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics