Abstract
Informed consent is the cornerstone of what we clinicians do – without it, no medical act should properly proceed. Without consent, what surgeons do could be considered a form of assault and battery. The main elements of consent are disclosure (has the patient received all the information any reasonable person would want to know in the same situation?), capacity (is the patient capable of comprehending the information given and the consequences of the proposed treatment or proceeding without it?), and voluntariness (is the patient free of undue forces which might influence his/her decision away from what they really want?).
This chapter explores these elements along with important related topics like surrogate consent or consent by a substitute decision maker, consent for children who may be unfairly considered incapable simply due to their biological age, cultural influences in informed consent, and consent for novel procedures constituting surgical innovation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics (1995) Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. J Pediatr 102:169–176
Annas GJ, Grodin MA (1992) The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code – human rights in human experimentation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Appelbaum PS, Grisso T (1988) Assessing patient’s capacity to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med 319:1635–1638
Bernstein M, Bampoe J (2004) Surgical innovation or surgical evolution: an ethical and practical guide to handling novel neurosurgical procedures. J Neurosurg 100:2–7
Bernstein M (2005) Fully informed consent is impossible in surgical clinical trials. Can J Surg 48:271–272
Blackhall LJ, Murphy ST, Frank G (1995) Ethnicity and attitudes towards patient autonomy. JAMA 274:820–825
Bock DW (2008) Philosophical justifications of informed consent in research. Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Carrese JA, Rhodes LA (1995) Western bioethics on the Navajo reservation: benefit or harm? JAMA 274:826–829
Diaz JL, Barreto P, Gallego JM et al (2009) Proper information during the surgical decision-making process lowers the anxiety of patients with high-grade gliomas. Acta Neurochir 151:357–362
Etchells E, Sharpe G, Burgess MM et al (1996a) Bioethics for clinicians: 2. Disclosure. CMAJ 155:387–391
Etchells E, Sharpe G, Dykeman MJ et al (1996b) Bioethics for clinicians: 4. Voluntariness. CMAJ 155:1083–1086
Etchells E, Sharpe G, Elliott C et al (1996c) Bioethics for clinicians: 3. Capacity. CMAJ 155:657–661
Ford PJ (2009) Vulnerable brains: research ethics and neurosurgical patients. J Law Med Ethics 37:73–82
Hall DE, Prochazka AV, Fink AS (2012) Informed consent for clinical treatment. CMAJ 184:533–540
Harrison C, Kenny NP, Sidarous M et al (1997) Bioethics for clinicians: 9. Involving children in medical decisions. CMAJ 156:825–828
Johnson-Greene D (2010) Informed consent issues in traumatic brain injury research: current status of capacity assessment and recommendations for safeguards. J Head Trauma Rehabil 25:145–150
Knifed E, Lipsman N, Mason W et al (2008) Patients’ perception of the informed consent process for neurooncology clinical trials. Neurooncology 10:348–354
Krupp W, Spanehl O, Laubach W et al (2000) Informed consent in neurosurgery: patients’ recall of preoperative discussion. Acta Neurochir 142:233–239
Lazar NM, Greiner GG, Robertson G et al (1996) Bioethics for clinicians: 5. Substitute decision-making. CMAJ 155:1435–1437
Lee KJ, Havens PL, Sato TT et al (2006) Assent for treatment: clinical knowledge, attitudes and practice. Pediatrics 118:723–730
Leiken SL (1983) Minors’ assent or dissent to medical treatment. J Pediatr 102:169–176
Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS (2002) The therapeutic misconception: problems and solutions. Med Care 40:S55–S63
Lipsman N, Giacobbe P, Bernstein M et al (2012) Informed consent for clinical trials of deep brain stimulation in psychiatric disease: challenges and implications for trial design. J Med Ethics 38:107–111
Marson DC, Ingram KK, Cody HA et al (1995) Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer’s disease under different legal standards. Arch Neurol 52:949–954
McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB et al (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112
Samuels A (2003) Did the neurosurgeon warn the patient of the risks? Br J Neurosurg 17:117–120
Schmitz D, Reinacher PC (2006) Informed consent in neurosurgery-translating ethical theory into action. J Med Ethics 32:497–498
Substitute Decision Maker (2014) Available at: http://www.lco-cdo.org/en/older-adults-lco-funded-papers-margaret-hall-sectionIV
Taylor JS (2004) Autonomy and informed consent on the Navajo Reservation. J Soc Philos 35:506–516
Yamamoto F, Hashimoto N, Kagawa N et al (2011) A survey of disclosure of diagnosis to patients with glioma in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 16:230–237
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McDonald, P. (2014). Informed Consent. In: Ammar, A., Bernstein, M. (eds) Neurosurgical Ethics in Practice: Value-based Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54980-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54980-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54979-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54980-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)