Skip to main content

A Public Health Perspective on Reconstructing Post-Disaster Japan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Asia-Pacific Disaster Management
  • 1423 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reflects on the Great East Japan Earthquake through an analysis of three issues, starting with responses, moving then to consequences, and finally considering causes. First, I propose six public health principles for considering responses to the disasters and the reconstruction of Japan. The six principles provide a framework for assessing the responses to the Great East Japan Earthquake. Second, I examine the consequences of the disasters, especially for the victims and their struggle for redress. Potential responses are considered along three critical dimensions (care, compensation, and clean-up), based on the findings of a comparative study of responses to chemical disasters that I previously conducted. These three dimensions help the victims of disasters achieve redress. Each dimension of redress involves complex questions that go beyond technical aspects, and become involved in debates over politics and ethics. Third, I explore debates over fundamental causes of the nuclear power disaster. This exploration is based on the National Diet of Japan’s Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission Report, which was submitted on 28 June 2012. The reflections on these three topics provide a broader context for other chapters in this book and also contribute to Japan’s ongoing deliberations about its recent past and future paths.

This chapter is a revised combination of three lectures given in Japanese: (1) Keynote Address to the Tohoku Public Health Association Annual Meeting in Fukushima City on 22 July 2011, (2) a lecture at the Japan Medical Association Symposium on Health Policy on 11 March 2012, and (3) Keynote Address for Rissho University’s 140th Anniversary Symposium in Tokyo on 13 October 2012. The author appreciates helpful comments from Dr. Aya Goto, Associate Professor of Public Health at Fukushima Prefecture Medical University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Huddle and Reich (1975).

  2. 2.

    Reich (1991).

  3. 3.

    Japan Real Time (2011).

  4. 4.

    Jobin (2011).

  5. 5.

    Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (2010).

  6. 6.

    Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2011).

  7. 7.

    Putnam (1995).

  8. 8.

    Aldrich (2010).

  9. 9.

    Aldrich (2010).

  10. 10.

    Daniels (2008).

  11. 11.

    See: http://www.cdc.gov/eis/index.html.

  12. 12.

    US Federal Emergency Management Agency (2010).

  13. 13.

    Stigler (1971).

  14. 14.

    Tabuchi et al. (2011).

  15. 15.

    Onishi and Belson (2011).

  16. 16.

    Onishi and Belson (2011).

  17. 17.

    See Nasu (2013), in this volume.

  18. 18.

    Reich (1991), pp. 266–281. On milestones in providing redress following the 3/11 disasters in Japan, see further Nottage et al. (2013), in this volume; Rheuben and Nottage (2013).

  19. 19.

    Japan Times (2012).

  20. 20.

    Goto A, February 2012, Personal Communication.

  21. 21.

    McNeill (2012).

  22. 22.

    Tabuchi (2012).

  23. 23.

    National Diet of Japan (English) (2012), p. 9.

  24. 24.

    Kokkai Jiko Cho (2012), p. 6.

  25. 25.

    National Diet of Japan (English) (2012), p. 21.

  26. 26.

    National Diet of Japan (English) (2012), p. 21.

  27. 27.

    Kokkai Jiko Cho (2012), pp. 20–22.

  28. 28.

    National Diet of Japan (English) (2012), p. 9.

  29. 29.

    Curtis (2012).

  30. 30.

    Kokkai Jiko Cho (2012), pp. 5–6.

  31. 31.

    Kokkai Jiko Cho (2012), p. 6.

  32. 32.

    Hilgartner et al. (2011).

  33. 33.

    Report of the President’s Commission (1979), p. 8.

  34. 34.

    Report of the President’s Commission (1979), p. 9.

  35. 35.

    Report of the President’s Commission (1979), p. 8.

  36. 36.

    Report of the President’s Commission (1979), p. 7.

  37. 37.

    Hilgartner et al. (2011), p. 144.

  38. 38.

    Kokkai Jiko Cho (2012), p. 630.

  39. 39.

    Yilmaz (2011).

  40. 40.

    Associated Press (2012).

References

  • Aldrich DP (2010) Fixing recovery: social capital in post-crisis resilience. J Homeland Secur 6:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Associated Press (2012) UN envoy urges Japan to do more to protect health of residents affected by nuclear crisis. Washington Post, 26 November 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis G (2012) Stop blaming Fukushima on Japanese culture. Financial Times, 10 July 2012, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels N (2008) Just health: meeting health needs fairly. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgartner S, Bell RC, O’Connor R (2011) Nukespeak: the selling of nuclear technology from the Manhattan Project to Fukushima, 2nd edn. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco. http://nukespeak.org. Accessed 12 Jul 2012

  • Huddle N, Reich M (1975) Island of dreams: environmental crisis in Japan. Autumn Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Times (2012) Fukushima to test milk from 10,000 mothers. Japan Times, 13 January 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Real Time (2011) Letters from Fukushima: TEPCO worker emails. Japan Real Time (Wall Street Journal Blog), 28 March 2011. http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2011/03/28/letters-from-fukushima-tepco-worker-emails/. Accessed 27 May 2011

  • Jobin P (2011) Dying for TEPCO? Fukushima’s nuclear contract workers. Asia-Pacific J 9(3). http://japanfocus.org/-Paul-Jobin/3523?rand=1306547082&type=print&print=1. Accessed 27 May 2011

  • Kokkai Jiko Cho, Tokyo Denryoku Fukushima Genshiryoku Hatsudensho Jiko Chosa Iinkai (2012) Chosa Hokokusho [Honpen]. National Diet of Japan, Tokyo. http://naiic.go.jp. Accessed 13 Jul 2012

  • McNeill D (2012) Fukushima victims complain of stingy response. Mainichi Daily News, 18 February 2012, p 2a

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) (2010) Genshiryoku Anzen-Hoanin. Genshiryoku Shisetsu ni okeru Hoshasei Haikibutsu no Kanri Jokyo oyobi Hoshasen Gyomu Jyujisha no Senryo Kanri Jyoko ni Tsuite. METI, Tokyo, p 50. http://www.meti.go.jp/press/20100729007/20100729007-2.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2011

  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2011) Heisei 23 Nen Tohoku Chiho Taiheiyooki Jishin ni Kiin Shite Shojita Jitai ni Taio Suru Tame no Denri Hoshasen Shogain Boshi Kisoku no Tokurei ni Kan Suru Shorei. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Rodo Kijun Kyokucho, Tokyo. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/2r985200000194mr-att/2r985200000194ow.pdf. Accessed 7 Jul 2011

  • Nasu H (2013) Managing future disasters: Japan’s energy security and nanotechnology regulation. In: Butt S, Nasu H, Nottage L (eds) Asia-Pacific disaster management. Springer, Heidelberg (this volume). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39768-4

  • National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (2012) Official report. Executive summary. The National Diet of Japan, Tokyo (English version)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage L, Nasu H, Butt S (2013) Disaster management: socio-legal and Asia-Pacific perspectives. In: Butt S, Nasu H, Nottage L (eds) Asia-Pacific disaster management. Springer, Heidelberg (this volume). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39768-4

  • Onishi N, Belson K (2011) Culture of complicity tied to stricken nuclear power plant. 27 April 2011. The New York Times, p A1

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam RD (1995) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. J Democracy 6(1):65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich MR (1991) Toxic politics: responding to chemical disasters. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the President’s Commission on Three Mile Island: The need for change: The legacy of TMI (1979) US Government Printing Office, Washington. http://scienceblogs.de/geograffitico/files/2012/10/191.pdf. Accessed 13 Jul 2012

  • Rheuben J, Nottage L (2013) Now that the (radioactive) dust has settled: resolution of claims from the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Asian Dispute Rev (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler G (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J Econ Manag Sci 3:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabuchi H (2012) A confused nuclear cleanup. New York Times, 11 February 2012, p B1

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabuchi H, Onishi N, Belson K (2011) Japan extended reactor’s life, despite warning. The New York Times, 22 March 2011, p A1

    Google Scholar 

  • US Federal Emergency Management Agency (2010) Developing and maintaining emergency operations plans. Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 101, Version 2.0. FEMA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz S (2011) Fukushima nuclear disaster: a study in poor crisis communication. RSIS Commentaries. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, NTU, Singapore http://www.rsis.edu.sg/publications/Perspective/RSIS0932011.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Reich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reich, M.R. (2014). A Public Health Perspective on Reconstructing Post-Disaster Japan. In: Butt, S., Nasu, H., Nottage, L. (eds) Asia-Pacific Disaster Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39768-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics