Skip to main content

Using Data-Driven Discovery of Better Student Models to Improve Student Learning

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7926))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Deep analysis of domain content yields novel insights and can be used to produce better courses. Aspects of such analysis can be performed by applying AI and statistical algorithms to student data collected from educational technology and better cognitive models can be discovered and empirically validated in terms of more accurate predictions of student learning. However, can such improved models yield improved student learning? This paper reports positively on progress in closing this loop. We demonstrate that a tutor unit, redesigned based on data-driven cognitive model improvements, helped students reach mastery more efficiently. In particular, it produced better learning on the problem-decomposition planning skills that were the focus of the cognitive model improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes, T.: The Q-matrix Method: Mining Student Response Data for Knowledge. In: Beck, J. (ed.) Proceedings of AAAI 2005: Educational Data Mining Workshop (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beheshti, B., Desmarais, M., Naceur, R.: Methods to find the number of latent skills. In: Yacef, K., Zaïane, O., Hershkovitz, H., Yudelson, M., Stamper, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Chania, Greece, pp. 81–86 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, R.E., Feldon, D., van Merriënboer, J., Yates, K., Early, S.: Cognitive task analysis. In: Spector, J., Merrill, M., van Merriënboer, J., Driscoll, M. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 577–593 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 253–278 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koedinger, K.R., Baker, R.S.J.d., Cunningham, K., Skogsholm, A., Leber, B., Stamper, J.: A Data Repository for the EDM commuity: The PSLC DataShop. In: Romero, Ventura, Pechenizkiy, Baker (eds.) Handbook of Educational Data Mining. CRC Press (2010), http://learnlab.org/datashop

  6. Koedinger, K.R., McLaughlin, E.A.: Seeing language learning inside the math: Cognitive analysis yields transfer. In: Ohlsson, S., Catrambone, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 471–476. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.C., Perfetti, C.: The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction (KLI) framework: Bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cognitive Science 36(5), 757–798 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koedinger, K.R., McLaughlin, E.A., Stamper, J.C.: Automated Student Model Improvement. In: Yacef, K., Zaïane, O., Hershkovitz, H., Yudelson, M., Stamper, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Chania, Greece, pp. 17–24 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, R.L.: Cognitive task analysis: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lovett, M., Meyer, O., Thille, C.: The Open Learning Initiative: Measuring the effectiveness of the OLI statistics course in accelerating student learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education (2008), http://jime.open.ac.uk/2008/14

  11. Stamper, J.C., Koedinger, K.R.: Human-machine student model discovery and improvement using DataShop. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS, vol. 6738, pp. 353–360. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson, M., de Boeck, P.: Descriptive and explanatory item response models. In: de Boeck, P., Wilson, M. (eds.) Explanatory Item Response Models, pp. 43–74. Springer (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu, X., Simon, H.A.: Learning mathematics from examples and by doing. Cognition and Instruction 4(3), 137–166 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Koedinger, K.R., Stamper, J.C., McLaughlin, E.A., Nixon, T. (2013). Using Data-Driven Discovery of Better Student Models to Improve Student Learning. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39111-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39112-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics