Skip to main content

Project Progress and Risk Monitoring in Automation Systems Engineering

  • Conference paper
Software Quality. Increasing Value in Software and Systems Development (SWQD 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 133))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Current Automation Systems Engineering (ASE) projects consist of heterogeneous engineering workflows for managing processes that are executed in different engineering fields, e.g., mechanical, electrical, or software engineering. Project managers and engineers typically create and use their own specific engineering workflows for managing objects across the borders of heterogeneous engineering fields, such as development artifacts, change requests or signals. Major challenges in the context of addressing risk awareness for engineering workflow validation are the unawareness regarding risks of other project stakeholders and limited scalability of risk estimation approaches. In this paper, we propose the Engineering Service Bus (EngSB) framework for flexible and efficient object change management processes and risk-aware engineering workflow validation. The object change management here means the management of signal changes in an industry showcase. The workflow validation involves the activity to validate the real-world engineering project data with the designed workflow. Based on real-world engineering project data from a hydro power plant systems integrator we propose the definition of risk factors on project management and engineering levels to increase risk awareness. First results of the industry case study show that the inclusion of risk factors can enhance the overall engineering project quality, thus enabling risk mitigation in ASE projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldred, L., van der Aalst, W., Dumas, M., Hofstede, A.T.: Understanding the challenges in getting together: The semantics of decoupling in middleware. BPM Center Report BPM-06-19, BPMcenter. org

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, P., Lew, P., Olsina, L.: Strategy to improve quality for software applications: a process view. In: International Conference on on Software and Systems Process (ICSSP 2011), pp. 129–138. ACM, Waikiki (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biffl, S., Sunindyo, W., Moser, T.: Bridging Semantic Gaps Between Stakeholders in the Production Automation Domain with Ontology Areas. In: Proceedings of 21st SEKE, USA, pp. 233–239 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biffl, S., Schatten, A., Zoitl, A.: Integration of heterogeneous engineering environments for the automation systems lifecycle. In: 2009 7th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, pp. 576–581. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Biffl, S., Schatten, A.: A Platform for Service-Oriented Integration of Software Engineering Environments. In: Proceedings of SoMeT 2009, pp. 75–92. IOS Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boehm, B.W.: Software Risk Management: Principles and Practices. IEEE Software 8(1), 32–41 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chappel, D.A.: Enterprise Service Bus. O’Reilly Media (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clements, P., Northrop, L.M.: Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Doan, A.H., Noy, N.F., Halevy, A.Y.: Introduction to the special issue on semantic integration. ACM Sigmod Record 33, 11–13 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gartner Inc.: Gartner EXP Worldwide Survey of More than 1.500 CIOs Shows IT Spending to Be Flat (2009), http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=855612

  11. Hohpe, G.: 06291 Workshop Report: Conversation Patterns. In: Leymann, F., et al. (eds.) The Role of Business Processes in Service Oriented Architectures. Internationales Begegnungs-und Forschungszentrum für Informatik (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hohpe, G., Woolf, B.: Enterprise integration patterns: Designing, building, and deploying messaging solutions. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc., Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hubbard, D.: The Failure of Risk Management: Why It’s Broken and How to Fix It. John Wiley & Sons (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. IEEE: IEEE Guide–Adoption of the Project Management Institute (PMI(R)) Standard A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK(R) Guide), 4th edn. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. IEEE: IEEE Recommended Practice for CASE Tool Interconnection - Characterization of Interconnections. IEEE Std 1175.2-2006, pp. 1–45 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jakoubi, S., Tjoa, S.: A reference model for risk-aware business process management. In: Fourth International Conference on Risks and Security of Internet and Systems (CRiSIS 2009), pp. 82–89 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kontio, J.: Risk Management in Software Development: a technology overview and the RiskIt method. In: 21st ICSE Conference, pp. 679–680 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mordinyi, R., Pacha, A., Biffl, S.: Quality Assurance for Data from Low-Tech Participants in Distributed Automation Engineering Environments. In: Mammeri, Z. (ed.) Proceeding of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, pp. 1–4 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moser, T., Mordinyi, R., Winkler, D., Biffl, S.: Engineering project management using the Engineering Cockpit: A collaboration platform for project managers and engineers. In: Proceedings of INDIN 2011, pp. 579–584 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moser, T., Biffl, S., Sunindyo, W., Winkler, D.: Integrating Production Automation Expert Knowledge Across Engineering Domains. International Journal of Distributed Systems and Technologies (IJDST), Special Issue on Emerging Trends and Challenges in Large-Scale Networking and Distributed Systems 2(3), 88–103 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moser, T., Mordinyi, R., Mikula, A., Biffl, S.: Making Expert Knowledge Explicit to Facilitate Tool Support for Integrating Complex Information Systems in the ATM Domain. In: International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, CISIS 2009, pp. 90–97. IEEE Computer Society, Fukuoka (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Moser, T., Waltersdorfer, F., Winkler, D., Biffl, S.: Version Management and Conflict Detection across Tools in a (Software+) Engineering Environment. In: Proceedings of the Software Quality Days 2011, pp. 1–4 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nellore, R., Balachandra, R.: Factors influencing success in integrated product development (IPD) projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48(2), 164–174 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Noy, N.F., Doan, A., Halevy, A.Y.: Semantic Integration. AI Mag. 26, 7–10 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rademakers, T., Dirksen, J.: Open-source ESBs in action. Manning Pub. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rangan, R.M., Rohde, S.M., Peak, R., Chadha, B.: Streamlining Product Lifecycle Processes: A Survey of Product Lifecycle Management Implementations, Directions, and Challenges. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 5, 227–237 (2005); ST-Streamlining Product Lifecycle Proce

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ropponen, J., Lyytinen, K.: Components of Software Development Risk: How to Address Them? A Project Manager Survey. IEEE Trans. Soft. Eng. 26(2), 98–111 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empir. Software Eng. 14, 131–164 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sadiq, S., Orlowska, M., Sadiq, W., Foulger, C.: Data flow and validation in workflow modelling. In: 15th Australasian Database Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schafer, W., Wehrheim, H.: The Challenges of Building Advanced Mechatronic Systems. In: Future of Software Engineering (FOSE 2007), pp. 72–84. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Sunindyo, W.D., Moser, T., Winkler, D., Mordinyi, R., Biffl, S.: Workflow Validation Framework in Distributed Engineering Environments. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2011 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 7046, pp. 236–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Vose, D.: Risk Analysis - A Quantitative Study. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Winkler, D., Moser, T., Mordinyi, R., Sunindyo, W., Biffl, S.: Engineering Object Change Management Process Observation in Distributed Automation Systems Projects. In: Proceedings of EuroSPI 2011, pp. 1–12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Winkler, D., Biffl, S.: Improving Quality Assurance in Automation Systems Development Projects. In: Quality Assurance and Management, pp. 20–40. Intec Publishing (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sunindyo, W., Moser, T., Winkler, D., Mordinyi, R. (2013). Project Progress and Risk Monitoring in Automation Systems Engineering. In: Winkler, D., Biffl, S., Bergsmann, J. (eds) Software Quality. Increasing Value in Software and Systems Development. SWQD 2013. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 133. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35702-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35702-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35701-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35702-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics